incorporation by reference doctrine (New York) · Go Syfert
← New York issues

incorporation by reference doctrine in New York

14 New York opinions name it 3 courts 1918–2025 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (8)

CaseFollowedCited
Chiacchia v. National Westminster Bank USAgreen
nyappdiv · 1986 · cited in 4 New York opinions naming this issue, 1995–2025
2 sentences

2024Given that the plan description is extrinsic material, petitioners rely on the incorporation by reference doctrine, which provides that "the paper to be incorporated into a written instrument by reference must be so referred to and described in the instrument that the paper may be identified beyond all reasonable doubt" ( Chiacchia v National Westminster Bank , 124 AD2d 626, 628 [2d Dept 1986]; see Maines Paper & Food Serv., Inc. v Keystone Assoc., Architects, Engrs., & Surveyors, LLC , 134 AD3d 1340, 1342 [3d Dept 2015]).

2015Further, the Schedule A attached to these prior draft contracts differed, albeit only in minor respects, from the Schedule A that defendant purports to have attached to the executed contract. 2 The doctrine of incorporation by reference “is grounded on the premise that the material to be incorporated is so well known to the contracting parties that a mere reference to it is sufficient” (Chiacchia v National Westminster Bank, 124 AD2d 626, 628 [1986]).

34
Matter of Com'rs of Wash'ton Park, Albanygreen
ny · 1873 · cited in 5 New York opinions naming this issue, 1986–2025
2 sentences

1998The doctrine of incorporation by reference requires that the paper to be incorporated into the written instrument by reference must be so described in the instrument that the paper may be identified “beyond all reasonable doubt” (Matter of Board of Commrs., 52 NY 131, 134 ).

1986The doctrine of incorporation by reference requires that the paper to be incorporated into a written instrument by reference must be so referred to and described in the instrument that the paper may be identified beyond all reasonable doubt (see, Matter of Board of Commrs., 52 NY 131, 134 ).

25
Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc. v. Keystone Associates, Architects, Engineers, and Surveyors, LLCgreen
nyappdiv · 2015 · cited in 2 New York opinions naming this issue, 2019–2024
2 sentences

2024Given that the plan description is extrinsic material, petitioners rely on the incorporation by reference doctrine, which provides that "the paper to be incorporated into a written instrument by reference must be so referred to and described in the instrument that the paper may be identified beyond all reasonable doubt" ( Chiacchia v National Westminster Bank , 124 AD2d 626, 628 [2d Dept 1986]; see Maines Paper & Food Serv., Inc. v Keystone Assoc., Architects, Engrs., & Surveyors, LLC , 134 AD3d 1340, 1342 [3d Dept 2015]).

2019Although documents may be incorporated by reference as part of an executed agreement ( see Kachurin v Barr , 272 AD 391 , 398 [1st Dept 1947], affd 297 NY 889 [1948]; see also Life Receivables Trust v Goshawk Syndicate 102 at Lloyd's , 66 AD3d 495 , 498-499 [1st Dept 2009], affd 14 NY3d 850 [2010], cert denied 562 US 962 [2010]), the doctrine of incorporation by reference "is grounded on the premise that the material to be incorporated is so well known to the contracting parties that a mere reference to it is sufficient" ( see Maines Paper & Food Serv., Inc., v Keystone Assoc., Architects Engr

22
Shark Information Services Corp. v. Crum and Forster Commercial Insurancegreen
nyappdiv · 1995 · cited in 2 New York opinions naming this issue, 2018–2019
2 sentences

2019Corp. v Crum & Forster Commercial Ins. , 222 AD2d 251, 252 [1st Dept 1995]).

2018Corp. v Crum & Forster Commercial Ins. , 222 AD2d 251, 252 [1st Dept 1995]).

22
In Re the Accounting of Lockegreen
ny · 1932 · cited in 3 New York opinions naming this issue, 1935–1996
2 sentences

1996Consequently, here, in the conceded absence of allegations or evidence of fraud and the fact that the trust agreement in this case, which was signed contemporaneously with the will, was identifiable, precise and definite (see, Matter of Ivie, 4 NY2d 178, 181 ; Matter of Rausch, supra, at 331-332), we hold that the pourover provision in this case fits within the parameters of case law applying the common-law doctrine of incorporation by reference. 3 Mikoll, Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Spain, JJ., concur.

1995To further distinguish this case from Matter of Dickstein (supra) and to advance their arguments that there are exceptions to the doctrine of incorporation by reference, the respondents have cited such New York cases as Matter of Fowles ( 222 NY 222 ), Matter of Rausch ( 258 NY 327 ) and Matter of Tiffany ( 157 Misc 873 ).

13
Life Receivables Trust v. Goshawk Syndicate 102 at Lloyd'sgreen
ny · 2010 · cited in 1 New York opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019
1 sentence

2019Although documents may be incorporated by reference as part of an executed agreement ( see Kachurin v Barr , 272 AD 391 , 398 [1st Dept 1947], affd 297 NY 889 [1948]; see also Life Receivables Trust v Goshawk Syndicate 102 at Lloyd's , 66 AD3d 495 , 498-499 [1st Dept 2009], affd 14 NY3d 850 [2010], cert denied 562 US 962 [2010]), the doctrine of incorporation by reference "is grounded on the premise that the material to be incorporated is so well known to the contracting parties that a mere reference to it is sufficient" ( see Maines Paper & Food Serv., Inc., v Keystone Assoc., Architects Engr

11
Life Settlement Corp. v. Goshawk Syndicate 102 at Lloyd'sgreen
scotus · 2010 · cited in 1 New York opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019
1 sentence

2019Although documents may be incorporated by reference as part of an executed agreement ( see Kachurin v Barr , 272 AD 391 , 398 [1st Dept 1947], affd 297 NY 889 [1948]; see also Life Receivables Trust v Goshawk Syndicate 102 at Lloyd's , 66 AD3d 495 , 498-499 [1st Dept 2009], affd 14 NY3d 850 [2010], cert denied 562 US 962 [2010]), the doctrine of incorporation by reference "is grounded on the premise that the material to be incorporated is so well known to the contracting parties that a mere reference to it is sufficient" ( see Maines Paper & Food Serv., Inc., v Keystone Assoc., Architects Engr

11
Kenner v. Avis Rent A Car System, Inc.green
nyappdiv · 1998 · cited in 1 New York opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
1 sentence

2015The document is required to also be described in the contract such that it is identifiable “ ‘beyond all reasonable doubt’ ” (Kenner v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 254 AD2d 704, 704 [1998], quoting Matter of Board of Commrs. of Washington Park of City of Albany, 52 NY 131, 134 [1873]; accord Unclaimed Prop.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (8)

CaseCitedYears
In Re the Will of Fowles green
ny · 1918
2 sentences

1995To further distinguish this case from Matter of Dickstein (supra) and to advance their arguments that there are exceptions to the doctrine of incorporation by reference, the respondents have cited such New York cases as Matter of Fowles ( 222 NY 222 ), Matter of Rausch ( 258 NY 327 ) and Matter of Tiffany ( 157 Misc 873 ).

1935The decisions of the New York courts in refusing to accept the doctrine of incorporation by reference (Booth v. Baptist Church, 126 N. Y. 215, 247 ), followed in other States, particularly in New Jersey and Connecticut, have been subjected to a modification in the doctrine by the more recent cases of Matter of Fowles, 222 N. Y. 222 and Matter of Rausch ( 258 N. Y. 327 , followed in Matter of Barlow, 144 Misc. 210 ; Matter of Hilliard, 154 id. 872).

21935–1995
Curley v. Lynch green
mass · 1910
2 sentences

1930(Curley v. Lynch, 206 Mass. 289 .) ” And Judge McLaughlin, dissenting in a separate opinion, said', (p. 244): “ There is, as it seems to me, a complete answer to the suggestion. (1) There is nothing in his will which in any way refers to her will and it cannot be read into his without disregarding: the rule as settled by this court that an unattested paper which is of a testamentary character cannot be taken as a part of a will even though referred to by that instrument.

1918(Curley v. Lynch, 206 Mass. 289 .) Mrs. Fowles has, therefore, failed to make any appointment as authorized by her husband’s will, and the one-half of the forty-five per centum of the residuary estate passes in accordance with the determination of the Appellate Division to the trusts for the testator’s children under the eighth clause.

21918–1930
Kachurin v. Barr neutral
ny · 1948
1 sentence

2019Although documents may be incorporated by reference as part of an executed agreement ( see Kachurin v Barr , 272 AD 391 , 398 [1st Dept 1947], affd 297 NY 889 [1948]; see also Life Receivables Trust v Goshawk Syndicate 102 at Lloyd's , 66 AD3d 495 , 498-499 [1st Dept 2009], affd 14 NY3d 850 [2010], cert denied 562 US 962 [2010]), the doctrine of incorporation by reference "is grounded on the premise that the material to be incorporated is so well known to the contracting parties that a mere reference to it is sufficient" ( see Maines Paper & Food Serv., Inc., v Keystone Assoc., Architects Engr

12019–2019
In re the Construction of the Will of Ivie green
ny · 1958
1 sentence

1996Consequently, here, in the conceded absence of allegations or evidence of fraud and the fact that the trust agreement in this case, which was signed contemporaneously with the will, was identifiable, precise and definite (see, Matter of Ivie, 4 NY2d 178, 181 ; Matter of Rausch, supra, at 331-332), we hold that the pourover provision in this case fits within the parameters of case law applying the common-law doctrine of incorporation by reference. 3 Mikoll, Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Spain, JJ., concur.

11996–1996
In re the Estate of Tiffany neutral
nysurct · 1935
1 sentence

1995To further distinguish this case from Matter of Dickstein (supra) and to advance their arguments that there are exceptions to the doctrine of incorporation by reference, the respondents have cited such New York cases as Matter of Fowles ( 222 NY 222 ), Matter of Rausch ( 258 NY 327 ) and Matter of Tiffany ( 157 Misc 873 ).

11995–1995
In re the Estate of Dickstein green
nysurct · 1989
1 sentence

1995To further distinguish this case from Matter of Dickstein (supra) and to advance their arguments that there are exceptions to the doctrine of incorporation by reference, the respondents have cited such New York cases as Matter of Fowles ( 222 NY 222 ), Matter of Rausch ( 258 NY 327 ) and Matter of Tiffany ( 157 Misc 873 ).

11995–1995
Booth v. Baptist Church of Christ of Poughkeepsie green
ny · 1891
1 sentence

1935The decisions of the New York courts in refusing to accept the doctrine of incorporation by reference (Booth v. Baptist Church, 126 N. Y. 215, 247 ), followed in other States, particularly in New Jersey and Connecticut, have been subjected to a modification in the doctrine by the more recent cases of Matter of Fowles, 222 N. Y. 222 and Matter of Rausch ( 258 N. Y. 327 , followed in Matter of Barlow, 144 Misc. 210 ; Matter of Hilliard, 154 id. 872).

11935–1935
In re the Estate of Barlow neutral
nysurct · 1932
1 sentence

1935The decisions of the New York courts in refusing to accept the doctrine of incorporation by reference (Booth v. Baptist Church, 126 N. Y. 215, 247 ), followed in other States, particularly in New Jersey and Connecticut, have been subjected to a modification in the doctrine by the more recent cases of Matter of Fowles, 222 N. Y. 222 and Matter of Rausch ( 258 N. Y. 327 , followed in Matter of Barlow, 144 Misc. 210 ; Matter of Hilliard, 154 id. 872).

11935–1935

Where else courts name it

DE 22 (2016–2025) TX 16 (1914–2026) WI 16 (1961–2026) NY 14 (1918–2025) CA 8 (1939–2024) NC 7 (1913–2026) OH 6 (2016–2026) KY 4 (1971–2021) OK 4 (1981–2022) FL 4 (1973–2010) IL 4 (2007–2019) SD 3 (1970–1989) CT 3 (1904–1973) WA 2 (1991–2014) MD 2 (2016–2016) MN 2 (1968–1987) CO 2 (2006–2013)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check