Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 2009–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Burtongreen2 sentences2018"Whether a defendant has a legitimate expectation of privacy in an area subjected to a search by police is a composite test of the defendant's subjective expectation and the objective reasonableness of the expectation ... ." Commonwealth v. Newman supra 84 A.2d at 1076. " 'Whether [a] defendant has a legitimate expectation of privacy is a component of the merits analysis of the suppression motion ... made upon evaluation of the evidence presented by the Commonwealth and the defendant ... [, if any].' " Commonwealth v. Enimpah supra 630 Pa. at 365 , 106 A.3d at 699 quoting Commonwealth v. Burto 2015Commonwealth v. Bostick, 958 A.2d 543, 553 (Pa. Super. 2008) (quoting Commonwealth v. Govens, 632 A.2d 1316, 1319 (Pa. Super. 1993)). -7- J-S63003-15 “Whether a defendant has a legitimate expectation of privacy is a component of the merits analysis of the suppression motion ... made upon evaluation of the evidence presented by the Commonwealth and the defendant.” Enimpah, 106 A.3d at 699 (quoting Commonwealth v. Burton, 973 A.2d 428, 435 (Pa. Super. 2009) (en banc)). | 7 | 7 |
Commonwealth v. Millnergreen2 sentences2015Whether a defendant has a legitimate expectation of privacy is a component of the merits analysis of the suppression motion. -5- J-S61023-15 Commonwealth v. Millner, 888 A.2d 680, 691 (Pa. 2005). 2014See Hawkins, supra. In this expectation of privacy is a component of the merits analysis of the Commonwealth v. Millner, 888 A.2d 680, 691 (Pa. 2005). | 7 | 7 |
Commonwealth v. Powellgreen2 sentences2018See also Commonwealth v. Powell supra 994 A.2d at 1103-04 . 2018“Whether a defendant has a legitimate expectation of privacy is a component of the merits analysis of the suppression motion.” Id. (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Govensgreen1 sentence2015Commonwealth v. Bostick, 958 A.2d 543, 553 (Pa. Super. 2008) (quoting Commonwealth v. Govens, 632 A.2d 1316, 1319 (Pa. Super. 1993)). -7- J-S63003-15 “Whether a defendant has a legitimate expectation of privacy is a component of the merits analysis of the suppression motion ... made upon evaluation of the evidence presented by the Commonwealth and the defendant.” Enimpah, 106 A.3d at 699 (quoting Commonwealth v. Burton, 973 A.2d 428, 435 (Pa. Super. 2009) (en banc)). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Bostickgreen1 sentence2015Commonwealth v. Bostick, 958 A.2d 543, 553 (Pa. Super. 2008) (quoting Commonwealth v. Govens, 632 A.2d 1316, 1319 (Pa. Super. 1993)). -7- J-S63003-15 “Whether a defendant has a legitimate expectation of privacy is a component of the merits analysis of the suppression motion ... made upon evaluation of the evidence presented by the Commonwealth and the defendant.” Enimpah, 106 A.3d at 699 (quoting Commonwealth v. Burton, 973 A.2d 428, 435 (Pa. Super. 2009) (en banc)). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Enimpahgreen1 sentence2014Commonwealth v. Millner, 585 Pa. 237 , 888 A.2d 680, 691 (2005); see also Commonwealth v. Enimpah, 62 A.3d 1028, 1032-33 (Pa.Super.2013) (distinguishing the Commonwealth’s burden of production at the merits phase of a suppression hearing with the defendant’s burden of persuasion regarding his privacy interest in the property searched). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Hawkinsgreen1 sentence2014See Hawkins, supra. In this expectation of privacy is a component of the merits analysis of the Commonwealth v. Millner, 888 A.2d 680, 691 (Pa. 2005). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Enimpah, A.
green
2 sentences2018"Whether a defendant has a legitimate expectation of privacy in an area subjected to a search by police is a composite test of the defendant's subjective expectation and the objective reasonableness of the expectation ... ." Commonwealth v. Newman supra 84 A.2d at 1076. " 'Whether [a] defendant has a legitimate expectation of privacy is a component of the merits analysis of the suppression motion ... made upon evaluation of the evidence presented by the Commonwealth and the defendant ... [, if any].' " Commonwealth v. Enimpah supra 630 Pa. at 365 , 106 A.3d at 699 quoting Commonwealth v. Burto 2018"Whether a defendant has a legitimate expectation of privacy in an area subjected to a search by police is a composite test of the defendant's subjective expectation and the objective reasonableness of the expectation ... ." Commonwealth v. Newman supra 84 A.2d at 1076. " 'Whether [a] defendant has a legitimate expectation of privacy is a component of the merits analysis of the suppression motion ... made upon evaluation of the evidence presented by the Commonwealth and the defendant ... [, if any].' " Commonwealth v. Enimpah supra 630 Pa. at 365 , 106 A.3d at 699 quoting Commonwealth v. Burto | 2 | 2015–2018 |