Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 2002–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Cash America International Inc. v. Bennettgreen2 sentences2026Int’l Inc. v. Bennett, 35 S.W.3d 12, 18 (Tex. 2000) (emphasis added). 2018Int’l v. Bennett, 35 S.W.3d 12, 15 (Tex. 2000) (quoting Kenneth Culp Davis, Administrative Law Doctrines of Exhaustion of Remedies, Ripeness for Review, and Primary Jurisdiction: 1, 28 Tex. L. | 6 | 8 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
City of Galveston v. Flagship Hotel, Ltd.
green
2 sentences2005Flagship Hotel, 73 S.W.3d at 425 . 2005Flagship Hotel , 73 S.W.3d at 425 . | 3 | 2005–2005 |
Texas Commissioner of Education and Mission Consolidated Independent School District v. Dr. Maria Solis
green
1 sentence2024Solis, 562 S.W.3d at 597 . | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Texas Department of Transportation v. Jones Bros. Dirt & Paving Contractors, Inc.
green
2 sentences2015The Supreme Court determined the administrative law claim was the exclusive remedy, then stated, without explanation or analysis, that the trial court could only have affirmed or “reversed and remanded.” Jones Bros., 92 S.W.3d at 485 . 2015The Supreme Court determined the administrative law claim was the exclusive remedy, then stated, without explanation or analysis, that the trial court could only have affirmed or “reversed and remanded.” Jones Bros., 92 S.W.3d at 485 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Subaru of America, Inc. v. David McDavid Nissan, Inc.
green
1 sentence2011Id. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.