Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2002–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re DSgreen2 sentences2015In re D.S., 76 S.W.3d 512 , 516 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2002, no pet.). 2007In re D.S., 76 S.W.3d 512, 516 (Tex.App.Houston [14th Dist.] 2002, no pet.). | 5 | 6 |
Beaumont Bank, N.A. v. Bullergreen2 sentences2018Beaumont Bank, N.A. v. Buller, 806 S.W.2d 223, 226 (Tex. 1991). 2011Beaumont Bank, N.A. v. Buller , 806 S.W.2d 223, 226 (Tex. 1991). | 5 | 5 |
Hardin v. Hardingreen2 sentences2006It then states that “[a]n allegation of legal or factual insufficiency is not treated as an independent ground of error in this context because the appropriate standard of review is abuse of discretion.” See Hardin v. Hardin, 161 S.W.3d 14, 19 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2004, no pet.). 2006It then states that “[a]n allegation of legal or factual insufficiency is not treated as an independent ground of error in this context because the appropriate standard of review is abuse of discretion.” See Hardin v. Hardin , 161 S.W.3d 14, 19 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2004, no pet.) . | 4 | 4 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
McGuire v. McGuire
green
2 sentences2006The panel majority recognizes that such “[sufficiency challenges are incorporated into an abuse of discretion determination.” See McGuire v. McGuire, 4 S.W.3d 382 , 387 n. 2 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, no pet.). 2006The panel majority recognizes that such “[s]ufficiency challenges are incorporated into an abuse of discretion determination.” See McGuire v. McGuire , 4 S.W.3d 382 , 387 n.2 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, no pet.). | 2 | 2006–2006 |
Patterson v. Brist
green
1 sentence2019Patterson, 236 S.W.3d at 240 ; Hardin v. Hardin, 161 S.W.3d 14, 19 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2004, no pet.). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.