Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Lopez v. Stategreen2 sentences2014Vidaurri, 49 S.W.3d at 886 ; Lopez v. State, 96 S.W.3d 406, 414 (Tex. App.— Austin 2002, pet. ref’d) (“In order to preserve error for review as to the lack of a punishment hearing, a defendant must timely request such a hearing, object to the lack of such a hearing, or file a timely motion for new trial based on the omission.”). 2007Lopez v. State , 96 S.W.3d 406, 413-14 (Tex.App.–Austin 2002, pet. ref’d). | 5 | 5 |
Brunson v. Stategreen2 sentences2003Brunson v. State, 995 S.W.2d 709, 713 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1999, no pet.); Gober, 917 S.W.2d at 502. 2002Brunson v. State , 995 S.W.2d 709, 713 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1999, no pet.); Gober , 917 S.W.2d at 502. | 3 | 3 |
Issa v. Stategreen2 sentences2011See Issa v. State , 826 S.W.2d 159, 161 (Tex. Crim. 2011See Issa v. State, 826 S.W.2d 159, 161 (Tex. Crim. | 2 | 2 |
Thompson v. Stategreen1 sentence2023See Thompson v. State, 9 S.W.3d 808, 814 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Christian v. Stategreen1 sentence2011Lopez v. State, 96 S.W.2d 406 , 414 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, pet. ref’d); Christian v. State, 870 S.W.2d 86, 88 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1993, no pet.). | 1 | 1 |
Pearson v. Stategreen1 sentence2007Lopez v. State, 96 S.W.3d 406, 413-14 (Tex.App.–Austin 2002, pet. ref’d). 3 See Pearson v. State, 994 S.W.2d 176, 179 (Tex.Crim.App. 1999). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Vidaurri v. State
green
1 sentence2014Vidaurri, 49 S.W.3d at 886 ; Lopez v. State, 96 S.W.3d 406, 414 (Tex. App.— Austin 2002, pet. ref’d) (“In order to preserve error for review as to the lack of a punishment hearing, a defendant must timely request such a hearing, object to the lack of such a hearing, or file a timely motion for new trial based on the omission.”). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Boykin v. Alabama
green
2 sentences1999In addition to that important factual difference, there is an equally important legal difference: The right to be told the range of punishment when pleading guilty is constitutionally required, Boykin, 395 U.S. at 244 n. 7, 89 S.Ct. at 1713 n. 7, but there is no constitutional right to be told about deportation. 1999In addition to that important factual difference, there is an equally important legal difference: The right to be told the range of punishment when pleading guilty is constitutionally required, Boykin, 395 U.S. at 244 n. 7, 89 S.Ct. at 1713 n. 7, but there is no constitutional right to be told about deportation. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Wright v. State
green
2 sentences1984This Court in Rogers v. State, 640 S.W.2d 248 (Tex.Cr.App.1981), also see Wright v. State, 640 S.W.2d 265 (Tex.Cr.App.1982), recently held that the defendant could not for the first time on appeal complain of the failure of the trial court to hold a second hearing. 1984This Court in Rogers v. State, 640 S.W.2d 248 (Tex.Cr.App.1981), also see Wright v. State, 640 S.W.2d 265 (Tex.Cr.App.1982), recently held that the defendant could not for the first time on appeal complain of the failure of the trial court to hold a second hearing. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Rogers v. State
green
2 sentences1984This Court in Rogers v. State, 640 S.W.2d 248 (Tex.Cr.App.1981), also see Wright v. State, 640 S.W.2d 265 (Tex.Cr.App.1982), recently held that the defendant could not for the first time on appeal complain of the failure of the trial court to hold a second hearing. 1984This Court in Rogers v. State, 640 S.W.2d 248 (Tex.Cr.App.1981), also see Wright v. State, 640 S.W.2d 265 (Tex.Cr.App.1982), recently held that the defendant could not for the first time on appeal complain of the failure of the trial court to hold a second hearing. | 1 | 1984–1984 |