Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 2006–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Mechlergreen2 sentences2010State v. Mechler, 153 S.W.3d 435, 440-41 (Tex.Crim.App.2005). 2010State v. Mechler, 153 S.W.3d 435 , 440- 41 (Tex. Crim. | 3 | 4 |
State v. Stukesgreen2 sentences2018Appellant complains that the court 4 Appellant urges us to review de novo the trial court’s ruling admitting the extraneous offense evidence because the ruling does not involve a credibility determination, citing State v. Stukes, 490 S.W.3d 571, 574 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2016, no pet.). 2018Appellant complains that the court 4 Appellant urges us to review de novo the trial court’s ruling admitting the extraneous offense evidence because the ruling does not involve a credibility determination, citing State v. Stukes, 490 S.W.3d 571, 574 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2016, no pet.). | 2 | 2 |
Gaytan v. Stategreen2 sentences2015Gaytan v. State, 331 S.W.3d 218, 226-27 (Tex. App.—Austin 2011, pet ref’d). 2015Gaytan v. State, 331 S.W.3d 218 , 226– 27 (Tex. App.—Austin 2011, pet ref’d). | 1 | 3 |
Casey v. Stategreen1 sentence2014See Casey, 215 S.W.3d at 879 ; see also TEX. | 1 | 1 |
Mata v. Stategreen2 sentences2006The reason the probative value of the test result is so dependent on the actual test result and the elapsed time is demonstrated by the scientific literature cited by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals in Mata v. State, 46 S.W.3d 902, 910-13 (Tex.Crim.App.2001). 2006The reason the probative value of the test result is so dependent on the actual test result and the elapsed time is demonstrated by the scientific literature cited by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals in Mata v. State, 46 S.W.3d 902, 910-13 (Tex. Crim.App.2001). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hernandez v. State
green
2 sentences2024Id. at 324 . 2019Id. at 324 . | 3 | 2016–2024 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.