Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 1975–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Long v. Stategreen2 sentences2015See Long, 800 S.W.2d at 547–48; Villalon, 791 S.W.2d at 135–36. 2015See Long, 800 S.W.2d at 547–48; Villalon, 791 S.W.2d at 135–36. | 3 | 3 |
Montanez v. Stategreen2 sentences2010"Voluntary consent to search is a well-established exception to the warrant and probable cause requirements of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution." Montanez v. State, 195 S.W.3d 101, 105 (Tex.Crim.App.2006). 2010“Voluntary consent to search is a well-established exception to the warrant and probable cause requirements of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution.” Montanez v. State, 195 S.W.3d 101, 105 (Tex.Crim.App.2006). | 3 | 3 |
Neal v. Stategreen1 sentence2025See Neal v. State, 256 S.W.3d 264, 282 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Garciagreen1 sentence2019See id. | 1 | 1 |
Coble v. Stategreen1 sentence2016Contrary to the appellant’s assertion that the “onus” is “upon the State to prove the error was harmless” (Appellant Br. at 15), “the burden to demonstrate whether the appellant was harmed by a trial court error does not rest on either the appellant or the State.” Coble v. State, 330 S.W.3d 253, 280 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Villalon v. State
green
2 sentences2015See Long, 800 S.W.2d at 547–48; Villalon, 791 S.W.2d at 135–36. 2015See Long, 800 S.W.2d at 547–48; Villalon, 791 S.W.2d at 135–36. | 2 | 2015–2015 |
State v. Robinson
green
2 sentences2014Not only is placing the burden on the defendant contrary to binding precedent from the Court of Criminal Appeals, Robinson, 334 S.W.3d at 778-79 , placing the burden on the State to prove an exception to the warrant requirement makes sense because the facts regarding the practicality of obtaining a warrant are within its control. 2014Not only is placing the burden on the defendant contrary to binding precedent from the Court of Criminal Appeals, Robinson, 334 S.W.3d at 778–79, placing the burden on the State to prove an exception to the warrant requirement makes sense because the facts regarding the practicality of obtaining a warrant are within its control. | 2 | 2014–2014 |
Davis v. State
green
1 sentence2015See: Davis v. State, 195 SW3d 311 (App. 14 2006). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Chapman v. California
red
2 sentences1992Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 24 , 87 S.Ct. 824, 828 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967). 1992Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 24 , 87 S.Ct. 824, 828 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Stephenson v. State
green
1 sentence1975The circumstances here presented when considered in their totality are stronger in showing a“ consent to search than they were in Stephenson v. State, 494 S.W.2d 900 (Tex.Cr.App.1973), where it was said: “. . .we refuse to hold, as a matter of law, that an assertion by the officer conducting the search that he could or would obtain a search warrant if consent is refused, standing alone, invalidates an otherwise voluntary consent.” See also Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218 , 93 S.Ct. 2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973), and Hoover v. Beto, 439 F.2d 913 (5th Cir. 1971). | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Sam Hoover v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections
green
1 sentence1975The circumstances here presented when considered in their totality are stronger in showing a“ consent to search than they were in Stephenson v. State, 494 S.W.2d 900 (Tex.Cr.App.1973), where it was said: “. . .we refuse to hold, as a matter of law, that an assertion by the officer conducting the search that he could or would obtain a search warrant if consent is refused, standing alone, invalidates an otherwise voluntary consent.” See also Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218 , 93 S.Ct. 2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973), and Hoover v. Beto, 439 F.2d 913 (5th Cir. 1971). | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Schneckloth v. Bustamonte
green
2 sentences1975The circumstances here presented when considered in their totality are stronger in showing a“ consent to search than they were in Stephenson v. State, 494 S.W.2d 900 (Tex.Cr.App.1973), where it was said: “. . .we refuse to hold, as a matter of law, that an assertion by the officer conducting the search that he could or would obtain a search warrant if consent is refused, standing alone, invalidates an otherwise voluntary consent.” See also Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218 , 93 S.Ct. 2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973), and Hoover v. Beto, 439 F.2d 913 (5th Cir. 1971). 1975The circumstances here presented when considered in their totality are stronger in showing a“ consent to search than they were in Stephenson v. State, 494 S.W.2d 900 (Tex.Cr.App.1973), where it was said: “. . .we refuse to hold, as a matter of law, that an assertion by the officer conducting the search that he could or would obtain a search warrant if consent is refused, standing alone, invalidates an otherwise voluntary consent.” See also Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218 , 93 S.Ct. 2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973), and Hoover v. Beto, 439 F.2d 913 (5th Cir. 1971). | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.