Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 West Virginia opinions name it 1 courts 1980–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by West Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Danco, Inc. v. Donahuegreen1 sentence2020Cf. Danco, Inc. v. Donahue, 176 W. | 1 | 1 |
Painter v. Peavygreen2 sentences2017See Rule 61, W.V.R.Civ.P. (providing that “[t]he court at every stage of the proceeding must disregard any error or defect in the proceeding which does not affect the substantial rights of the parties”). 3 taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the nonmoving party.” 192 W.Va. at 190 , 451 S.E.2d at 756 . 2017See Rule 61, W.V.R.Civ.P. (providing that “[t]he court at every stage of the proceeding must disregard any error or defect in the proceeding which does not affect the substantial rights of the parties”). 3 taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the nonmoving party.” 192 W.Va. at 190 , 451 S.E.2d at 756 . | 1 | 1 |
Lacy v. CSX Transportation, Inc.green2 sentences2014See also Lacy v. CSX Transp., Inc., 205 W. 2014See also Lacy v. CSX Transp., Inc., 205 W.Va. 630, 643-44 , 520 S.E.2d 418, 431-32 (1999) ("Under W. | 1 | 1 |
Maynard v. Adkinsgreen2 sentences1997See Maynard v. Adkins, 193 W.Va. 456 , 457 S.E.2d 133 (1995) (This Court, citing to W. 1997See Maynard v. Adkins, 193 W.Va. 456 , 457 S.E.2d 133 (1995) (This Court, citing to W. | 1 | 1 |
Ilosky v. Michelin Tire Corp.green2 sentences1983Rule 61 of the West Virginia Rules of Civil Procedure provides, “The court at every stage of the proceeding must disregard any error or defect in the proceeding which does not affect the substantial rights of parties.” In Syllabus Point 2 of Boggs v. Settle, 150 W.Va. 330 , 145 S.E.2d 446 (1965), this Court stated, “On appeal of a case involving an action covered by the Rules of Civil Procedure, this Court will disregard and regard as harmless any error, defect or irregularity in the proceedings in the trial court which does not affect the substantial rights of the parties.” See also Ilosky v. 1983Rule 61 of the West Virginia Rules of Civil Procedure provides, “The court at every stage of the proceeding must disregard any error or defect in the proceeding which does not affect the substantial rights of parties.” In Syllabus Point 2 of Boggs v. Settle, 150 W.Va. 330 , 145 S.E.2d 446 (1965), this Court stated, “On appeal of a case involving an action covered by the Rules of Civil Procedure, this Court will disregard and regard as harmless any error, defect or irregularity in the proceedings in the trial court which does not affect the substantial rights of the parties.” See also Ilosky v. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in West Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Boggs v. Settle
green
2 sentences1983Rule 61 of the West Virginia Rules of Civil Procedure provides, “The court at every stage of the proceeding must disregard any error or defect in the proceeding which does not affect the substantial rights of parties.” In Syllabus Point 2 of Boggs v. Settle, 150 W.Va. 330 , 145 S.E.2d 446 (1965), this Court stated, “On appeal of a case involving an action covered by the Rules of Civil Procedure, this Court will disregard and regard as harmless any error, defect or irregularity in the proceedings in the trial court which does not affect the substantial rights of the parties.” See also Ilosky v. 1983Rule 61 of the West Virginia Rules of Civil Procedure provides, “The court at every stage of the proceeding must disregard any error or defect in the proceeding which does not affect the substantial rights of parties.” In Syllabus Point 2 of Boggs v. Settle, 150 W.Va. 330 , 145 S.E.2d 446 (1965), this Court stated, “On appeal of a case involving an action covered by the Rules of Civil Procedure, this Court will disregard and regard as harmless any error, defect or irregularity in the proceedings in the trial court which does not affect the substantial rights of the parties.” See also Ilosky v. | 2 | 1983–2012 |
Parham v. Horace Mann Insurance
green
2 sentences2019Co., 200 W.Va. 609 , 617 n.12, 490 S.E.2d 696 , 704 n.12 (1997) (Internal quotations and citations omitted.); see Rule 61, W.V.R.C.P. (providing that “[t]he court at every stage of the proceeding must disregard any error or defect in the proceeding which does not affect the substantial rights of the parties.”). 2019Co., 200 W.Va. 609 , 617 n.12, 490 S.E.2d 696 , 704 n.12 (1997) (Internal quotations and citations omitted.); see Rule 61, W.V.R.C.P. (providing that “[t]he court at every stage of the proceeding must disregard any error or defect in the proceeding which does not affect the substantial rights of the parties.”). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Maxwell v. Kent
neutral
2 sentences2014Furthermore, “‘[w]hen evidence is excluded and the action of the court in excluding it is relied upon in the appellate court, it must appear on the record that the evidence rejected was or would have been relevant, material and important to make its rejection available as a ground of error.’ Syllabus Point 5, Maxwell v. Kent, 49 W.Va. 542 , 39 S.E. 174 (1901).” Syl. 2014Furthermore, “‘[w]hen evidence is excluded and the action of the court in excluding it is relied upon in the appellate court, it must appear on the record that the evidence rejected was or would have been relevant, material and important to make its rejection available as a ground of error.’ Syllabus Point 5, Maxwell v. Kent, 49 W.Va. 542 , 39 S.E. 174 (1901).” Syl. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Phillip v. United States
green
1 sentence2007Rule 103(a) of the West Virginia Rules of Evidence also provides that “[ejrror may not be predicated upon a ruling which admits or excludes evidence unless a substantial right of the party is affected_” As this Court articulated in State v. Bradshaw, 193 W.Va. 519 , 457 S.E.2d 456 (1995), cert. denied, Bradshaw v. West Virginia, 516 U.S. 872 , 116 S.Ct. 196 , 133 L.Ed.2d 131 , “[t]he harmless error inquiry involves an assessment of the likelihood that the error affected the outcome of the trial.” 193 W.Va. at 539 , 457 S.E.2d at 476 . | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Hill v. Florida
green
1 sentence2007Rule 103(a) of the West Virginia Rules of Evidence also provides that “[ejrror may not be predicated upon a ruling which admits or excludes evidence unless a substantial right of the party is affected_” As this Court articulated in State v. Bradshaw, 193 W.Va. 519 , 457 S.E.2d 456 (1995), cert. denied, Bradshaw v. West Virginia, 516 U.S. 872 , 116 S.Ct. 196 , 133 L.Ed.2d 131 , “[t]he harmless error inquiry involves an assessment of the likelihood that the error affected the outcome of the trial.” 193 W.Va. at 539 , 457 S.E.2d at 476 . | 1 | 2007–2007 |
State v. Bradshaw
green
2 sentences2007Rule 103(a) of the West Virginia Rules of Evidence also provides that “[ejrror may not be predicated upon a ruling which admits or excludes evidence unless a substantial right of the party is affected_” As this Court articulated in State v. Bradshaw, 193 W.Va. 519 , 457 S.E.2d 456 (1995), cert. denied, Bradshaw v. West Virginia, 516 U.S. 872 , 116 S.Ct. 196 , 133 L.Ed.2d 131 , “[t]he harmless error inquiry involves an assessment of the likelihood that the error affected the outcome of the trial.” 193 W.Va. at 539 , 457 S.E.2d at 476 . 2007Rule 103(a) of the West Virginia Rules of Evidence also provides that “[ejrror may not be predicated upon a ruling which admits or excludes evidence unless a substantial right of the party is affected_” As this Court articulated in State v. Bradshaw, 193 W.Va. 519 , 457 S.E.2d 456 (1995), cert. denied, Bradshaw v. West Virginia, 516 U.S. 872 , 116 S.Ct. 196 , 133 L.Ed.2d 131 , “[t]he harmless error inquiry involves an assessment of the likelihood that the error affected the outcome of the trial.” 193 W.Va. at 539 , 457 S.E.2d at 476 . | 1 | 2007–2007 |
State v. Valentine
green
2 sentences2002In State v. Valentine, 208 W.Va. 513 , 541 S.E.2d 603 (2000), discussed by the dissent in support of its substantial compliance theory, this Court applied the harmless error doctrine to resolve the matter, rather than engaging in a substantial compliance deliberation. 2002In State v. Valentine, 208 W.Va. 513 , 541 S.E.2d 603 (2000), discussed by the dissent in support of its substantial compliance theory, this Court applied the harmless error doctrine to resolve the matter, rather than engaging in a substantial compliance deliberation. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Skaggs v. Elk Run Coal Co., Inc.
green
2 sentences1998Similarly, in Skaggs, 198 W.Va. at 70-71 , 479 S.E.2d at 580-81 , we "direct[ed] reviewing judges to inquire, when determining whether an alleged error is harmless, whether they are in `grave doubt about the likely effect of an error on the jury's verdict,' O'Neal [ v. McAninch ], 513 U.S. [432,] 435, 115 S.Ct. [992,] 994, 130 L.Ed.2d [947,] 951 [ (1995) ]; if a court does have grave doubt, then the error is harmful." Thus, if the contested instruction does not affect the complaining party's substantial rights, any alleged error is harmless, and the challenge to the trial court's jury instruct 1998Similarly, in Skaggs, 198 W.Va. at 70-71 , 479 S.E.2d at 580-81 , we "direct[ed] reviewing judges to inquire, when determining whether an alleged error is harmless, whether they are in `grave doubt about the likely effect of an error on the jury's verdict,' O'Neal [ v. McAninch ], 513 U.S. [432,] 435, 115 S.Ct. [992,] 994, 130 L.Ed.2d [947,] 951 [ (1995) ]; if a court does have grave doubt, then the error is harmful." Thus, if the contested instruction does not affect the complaining party's substantial rights, any alleged error is harmless, and the challenge to the trial court's jury instruct | 1 | 1998–1998 |
State v. Farmer
green
1 sentence1997Id. 14 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
O'NEAL v. McAninch
green
2 sentences1996The recent decisions in O’Neal v. McAninch, 513 U.S. 432 , 115 S.Ct. *71 992, 130 L.Ed.2d 947 (1995), and State v. Guthrie, supra, direct reviewing judges to inquire, when determining whether an alleged error is harmless, whether they are in “grave doubt about the likely effect of an error on a jury’s verdict,” O’Neal, 513 U.S. at 435 , 115 S.Ct. at 994 , 130 L.Ed.2d at 951 ; if a court does have grave doubt, then the error is harmful. 1996The recent decisions in O’Neal v. McAninch, 513 U.S. 432 , 115 S.Ct. *71 992, 130 L.Ed.2d 947 (1995), and State v. Guthrie, supra, direct reviewing judges to inquire, when determining whether an alleged error is harmless, whether they are in “grave doubt about the likely effect of an error on a jury’s verdict,” O’Neal, 513 U.S. at 435 , 115 S.Ct. at 994 , 130 L.Ed.2d at 951 ; if a court does have grave doubt, then the error is harmful. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Johnson v. Huntington Moving & Storage, Inc.
green
2 sentences1983Rule 61 of the West Virginia Rules of Civil Procedure provides, “The court at every stage of the proceeding must disregard any error or defect in the proceeding which does not affect the substantial rights of parties.” In Syllabus Point 2 of Boggs v. Settle, 150 W.Va. 330 , 145 S.E.2d 446 (1965), this Court stated, “On appeal of a case involving an action covered by the Rules of Civil Procedure, this Court will disregard and regard as harmless any error, defect or irregularity in the proceedings in the trial court which does not affect the substantial rights of the parties.” See also Ilosky v. 1983Rule 61 of the West Virginia Rules of Civil Procedure provides, “The court at every stage of the proceeding must disregard any error or defect in the proceeding which does not affect the substantial rights of parties.” In Syllabus Point 2 of Boggs v. Settle, 150 W.Va. 330 , 145 S.E.2d 446 (1965), this Court stated, “On appeal of a case involving an action covered by the Rules of Civil Procedure, this Court will disregard and regard as harmless any error, defect or irregularity in the proceedings in the trial court which does not affect the substantial rights of the parties.” See also Ilosky v. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Crusenberry v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.
green
2 sentences1983Co., 155 W.Va. 155 , 180 S.E.2d 219 (W.Va.1971). 1983Co., 155 W.Va. 155 , 180 S.E.2d 219 (W.Va.1971). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Pioneer Co. v. Hutchinson
green
2 sentences1983Rule 61 of the West Virginia Rules of Civil Procedure provides, “The court at every stage of the proceeding must disregard any error or defect in the proceeding which does not affect the substantial rights of parties.” In Syllabus Point 2 of Boggs v. Settle, 150 W.Va. 330 , 145 S.E.2d 446 (1965), this Court stated, “On appeal of a case involving an action covered by the Rules of Civil Procedure, this Court will disregard and regard as harmless any error, defect or irregularity in the proceedings in the trial court which does not affect the substantial rights of the parties.” See also Ilosky v. 1983Rule 61 of the West Virginia Rules of Civil Procedure provides, “The court at every stage of the proceeding must disregard any error or defect in the proceeding which does not affect the substantial rights of parties.” In Syllabus Point 2 of Boggs v. Settle, 150 W.Va. 330 , 145 S.E.2d 446 (1965), this Court stated, “On appeal of a case involving an action covered by the Rules of Civil Procedure, this Court will disregard and regard as harmless any error, defect or irregularity in the proceedings in the trial court which does not affect the substantial rights of the parties.” See also Ilosky v. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Butler's Discount Auto Sales, Inc. v. Roberts
green
2 sentences1983Rule 61 of the West Virginia Rules of Civil Procedure provides, “The court at every stage of the proceeding must disregard any error or defect in the proceeding which does not affect the substantial rights of parties.” In Syllabus Point 2 of Boggs v. Settle, 150 W.Va. 330 , 145 S.E.2d 446 (1965), this Court stated, “On appeal of a case involving an action covered by the Rules of Civil Procedure, this Court will disregard and regard as harmless any error, defect or irregularity in the proceedings in the trial court which does not affect the substantial rights of the parties.” See also Ilosky v. 1983Rule 61 of the West Virginia Rules of Civil Procedure provides, “The court at every stage of the proceeding must disregard any error or defect in the proceeding which does not affect the substantial rights of parties.” In Syllabus Point 2 of Boggs v. Settle, 150 W.Va. 330 , 145 S.E.2d 446 (1965), this Court stated, “On appeal of a case involving an action covered by the Rules of Civil Procedure, this Court will disregard and regard as harmless any error, defect or irregularity in the proceedings in the trial court which does not affect the substantial rights of the parties.” See also Ilosky v. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Talkington v. Barnhart
green
2 sentences1983Rule 61 of the West Virginia Rules of Civil Procedure provides, “The court at every stage of the proceeding must disregard any error or defect in the proceeding which does not affect the substantial rights of parties.” In Syllabus Point 2 of Boggs v. Settle, 150 W.Va. 330 , 145 S.E.2d 446 (1965), this Court stated, “On appeal of a case involving an action covered by the Rules of Civil Procedure, this Court will disregard and regard as harmless any error, defect or irregularity in the proceedings in the trial court which does not affect the substantial rights of the parties.” See also Ilosky v. 1983Rule 61 of the West Virginia Rules of Civil Procedure provides, “The court at every stage of the proceeding must disregard any error or defect in the proceeding which does not affect the substantial rights of parties.” In Syllabus Point 2 of Boggs v. Settle, 150 W.Va. 330 , 145 S.E.2d 446 (1965), this Court stated, “On appeal of a case involving an action covered by the Rules of Civil Procedure, this Court will disregard and regard as harmless any error, defect or irregularity in the proceedings in the trial court which does not affect the substantial rights of the parties.” See also Ilosky v. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Davis v. Ralston Purina Company
green
2 sentences1980The court at every stage of the proceeding must disregard any error or defect in the proceeding which does not affect the substantial rights of the parties. 6 See generally, Davis v. Ralston Purina Co., 248 Ark. 14 , 449 S.W.2d 709 (1970); Schmitt v. Matthews, 12 Wash. App. 654 , 531 P.2d 309 (1975); Martin v. Granger, 205 S.W. 725 (Tex. 1918); Fidelity and Casualty Co. v. Bank of Commerce, 285 Ala. 580 , 234 So.2d 871 (1970); Echols v. Olsen, 63 Ill.2d 270 , 347 N.E.2d 720 (1976). 1980The court at every stage of the proceeding must disregard any error or defect in the proceeding which does not affect the substantial rights of the parties. 6 See generally, Davis v. Ralston Purina Co., 248 Ark. 14 , 449 S.W.2d 709 (1970); Schmitt v. Matthews, 12 Wash. App. 654 , 531 P.2d 309 (1975); Martin v. Granger, 205 S.W. 725 (Tex. 1918); Fidelity and Casualty Co. v. Bank of Commerce, 285 Ala. 580 , 234 So.2d 871 (1970); Echols v. Olsen, 63 Ill.2d 270 , 347 N.E.2d 720 (1976). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Martin v. Granger
neutral
1 sentence1980The court at every stage of the proceeding must disregard any error or defect in the proceeding which does not affect the substantial rights of the parties. 6 See generally, Davis v. Ralston Purina Co., 248 Ark. 14 , 449 S.W.2d 709 (1970); Schmitt v. Matthews, 12 Wash. App. 654 , 531 P.2d 309 (1975); Martin v. Granger, 205 S.W. 725 (Tex. 1918); Fidelity and Casualty Co. v. Bank of Commerce, 285 Ala. 580 , 234 So.2d 871 (1970); Echols v. Olsen, 63 Ill.2d 270 , 347 N.E.2d 720 (1976). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Fidelity and Casualty Company v. Bank of Commerce
green
2 sentences1980The court at every stage of the proceeding must disregard any error or defect in the proceeding which does not affect the substantial rights of the parties. 6 See generally, Davis v. Ralston Purina Co., 248 Ark. 14 , 449 S.W.2d 709 (1970); Schmitt v. Matthews, 12 Wash. App. 654 , 531 P.2d 309 (1975); Martin v. Granger, 205 S.W. 725 (Tex. 1918); Fidelity and Casualty Co. v. Bank of Commerce, 285 Ala. 580 , 234 So.2d 871 (1970); Echols v. Olsen, 63 Ill.2d 270 , 347 N.E.2d 720 (1976). 1980The court at every stage of the proceeding must disregard any error or defect in the proceeding which does not affect the substantial rights of the parties. 6 See generally, Davis v. Ralston Purina Co., 248 Ark. 14 , 449 S.W.2d 709 (1970); Schmitt v. Matthews, 12 Wash. App. 654 , 531 P.2d 309 (1975); Martin v. Granger, 205 S.W. 725 (Tex. 1918); Fidelity and Casualty Co. v. Bank of Commerce, 285 Ala. 580 , 234 So.2d 871 (1970); Echols v. Olsen, 63 Ill.2d 270 , 347 N.E.2d 720 (1976). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Schmitt v. Matthews
green
2 sentences1980The court at every stage of the proceeding must disregard any error or defect in the proceeding which does not affect the substantial rights of the parties. 6 See generally, Davis v. Ralston Purina Co., 248 Ark. 14 , 449 S.W.2d 709 (1970); Schmitt v. Matthews, 12 Wash. App. 654 , 531 P.2d 309 (1975); Martin v. Granger, 205 S.W. 725 (Tex. 1918); Fidelity and Casualty Co. v. Bank of Commerce, 285 Ala. 580 , 234 So.2d 871 (1970); Echols v. Olsen, 63 Ill.2d 270 , 347 N.E.2d 720 (1976). 1980The court at every stage of the proceeding must disregard any error or defect in the proceeding which does not affect the substantial rights of the parties. 6 See generally, Davis v. Ralston Purina Co., 248 Ark. 14 , 449 S.W.2d 709 (1970); Schmitt v. Matthews, 12 Wash. App. 654 , 531 P.2d 309 (1975); Martin v. Granger, 205 S.W. 725 (Tex. 1918); Fidelity and Casualty Co. v. Bank of Commerce, 285 Ala. 580 , 234 So.2d 871 (1970); Echols v. Olsen, 63 Ill.2d 270 , 347 N.E.2d 720 (1976). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Echols v. Olsen
green
2 sentences1980The court at every stage of the proceeding must disregard any error or defect in the proceeding which does not affect the substantial rights of the parties. 6 See generally, Davis v. Ralston Purina Co., 248 Ark. 14 , 449 S.W.2d 709 (1970); Schmitt v. Matthews, 12 Wash. App. 654 , 531 P.2d 309 (1975); Martin v. Granger, 205 S.W. 725 (Tex. 1918); Fidelity and Casualty Co. v. Bank of Commerce, 285 Ala. 580 , 234 So.2d 871 (1970); Echols v. Olsen, 63 Ill.2d 270 , 347 N.E.2d 720 (1976). 1980The court at every stage of the proceeding must disregard any error or defect in the proceeding which does not affect the substantial rights of the parties. 6 See generally, Davis v. Ralston Purina Co., 248 Ark. 14 , 449 S.W.2d 709 (1970); Schmitt v. Matthews, 12 Wash. App. 654 , 531 P.2d 309 (1975); Martin v. Granger, 205 S.W. 725 (Tex. 1918); Fidelity and Casualty Co. v. Bank of Commerce, 285 Ala. 580 , 234 So.2d 871 (1970); Echols v. Olsen, 63 Ill.2d 270 , 347 N.E.2d 720 (1976). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.