Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
13 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 2016–2026 11 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Forrest City MacHine Works, Inc. v. Aderhold Ex Rel. Cross County Bankgreen2 sentences2023We have held “[a] vested right exists when the law declares that one has a claim against another, or it declares that one may resist the enforcement of a claim by another.” Forrest City Machine Works, Inc. v. Aderhold, 273 Ark. 33, 41 , 616 S.W.2d 720, 724 (1981). 2023We have held “[a] vested right exists when the law declares that one has a claim against another, or it declares that one may resist the enforcement of a claim by another.” Forrest City Machine Works, Inc. v. Aderhold, 273 Ark. 33, 41 , 616 S.W.2d 720, 724 (1981). | 1 | 1 |
Trusclair v. McGowan Working Partnersgreen2 sentences2021Trusclair v. McGowan Working Partners, 2009 Ark. 203 , at 3-4, 306 S.W.3d 428, 430 (citations omitted). 7 However, on January 1, 2019, we adopted Rule 4(k) of the Arkansas Rules of Civil Procedure, which relaxed the traditional strict-compliance standard by reestablishing the substantial-compliance standard. 2021Trusclair v. McGowan Working Partners, 2009 Ark. 203 , at 3-4, 306 S.W.3d 428, 430 (citations omitted). 7 However, on January 1, 2019, we adopted Rule 4(k) of the Arkansas Rules of Civil Procedure, which relaxed the traditional strict-compliance standard by reestablishing the substantial-compliance standard. | 1 | 1 |
Emis v. Emisgreen2 sentences2020App. P.–Civ. 3(e); see Emis v. Emis, 2017 Ark. 52, at 4 , 508 S.W.3d 886, 888 (applying a substantial-compliance standard rather than a strict- compliance standard and allowing appeal to proceed when document was timely filed and “because there was no prejudice to the appellee[.]”). 2020App. P.–Civ. 3(e); see Emis v. Emis, 2017 Ark. 52, at 4 , 508 S.W.3d 886, 888 (applying a substantial-compliance standard rather than a strict- compliance standard and allowing appeal to proceed when document was timely filed and “because there was no prejudice to the appellee[.]”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Stark Ligon, as Executive Director of the Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct v. Teresa Lynette Bloodman
green
2 sentences2024Our supreme court discussed the implications of Rule 4(k), adopted on January 1, 2019, in Ligon v. Bloodman, 2021 Ark. 124 , noting that this rule “relaxed the traditional strict- compliance standard by reestablishing the substantial-compliance standard,” 2021 Ark. 124, at 7 , and that it was in accord with older Arkansas authority, “both as to the summons and service of process, in nondefault cases.” 2021 Ark. 124, at 8 . 2024Our supreme court discussed the implications of Rule 4(k), adopted on January 1, 2019, in Ligon v. Bloodman, 2021 Ark. 124 , noting that this rule “relaxed the traditional strict- compliance standard by reestablishing the substantial-compliance standard,” 2021 Ark. 124, at 7 , and that it was in accord with older Arkansas authority, “both as to the summons and service of process, in nondefault cases.” 2021 Ark. 124, at 8 . | 7 | 2023–2026 |
Wilburn v. Keenan Companies, Inc.
green
2 sentences2021E.g., Wilburn v. Keenan Cos., 298 Ark. 461 , 768 S.W.2d 531 (1989); Edmonson v. Farris, 263 Ark. 505 , 565 S.W.2d 617 (1978). 2021E.g., Wilburn v. Keenan Cos., 298 Ark. 461 , 768 S.W.2d 531 (1989); Edmonson v. Farris, 263 Ark. 505 , 565 S.W.2d 617 (1978). | 2 | 2016–2021 |
Edmonson v. Farris
green
2 sentences2021E.g., Wilburn v. Keenan Cos., 298 Ark. 461 , 768 S.W.2d 531 (1989); Edmonson v. Farris, 263 Ark. 505 , 565 S.W.2d 617 (1978). 2021E.g., Wilburn v. Keenan Cos., 298 Ark. 461 , 768 S.W.2d 531 (1989); Edmonson v. Farris, 263 Ark. 505 , 565 S.W.2d 617 (1978). | 2 | 2016–2021 |
David Kinder v. Wendy Kinder
green
2 sentences2023App. 39, at 7 , 639 S.W.3d at 886 . 2023But as noted previously in Kinder II, “[u]nder a strict-compliance standard, it does not matter that [the appellee] would not have objected to the extension if she had the opportunity to respond.” 2022 Ark. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Dobbs v. Discover Bank
green
1 sentence2021Dobbs, 2012 Ark. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.