Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
13 California opinions name it 2 courts 1886–2023 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Horney v. Horneygreen2 sentences1968Co., 194 Cal.App.2d 868, 884 [ 15 Cal.Rptr. 757 ] ; Horney v. Horney, 118 Cal.App.2d 679, 682-683 [ 258 P.2d 555 ].) However, where a case is tried on the theory that a matter is in issue and evidence thereon is received without objection, it is too late, on appeal, to attack the finding. (2 Witkin, Cal. Procedure (1954) Trial, § 116, pp. 1848-1849.) The record in this case discloses that at the inception of the hearing, respondents ’ counsel advised the trial court that his clients objected to the petition on the merits in every respect, particularly with reference to the allegations containe 1968Co., 194 Cal.App.2d 868, 884 [ 15 Cal.Rptr. 757 ] ; Horney v. Horney, 118 Cal.App.2d 679, 682-683 [ 258 P.2d 555 ].) However, where a case is tried on the theory that a matter is in issue and evidence thereon is received without objection, it is too late, on appeal, to attack the finding. (2 Witkin, Cal. Procedure (1954) Trial, § 116, pp. 1848-1849.) The record in this case discloses that at the inception of the hearing, respondents ’ counsel advised the trial court that his clients objected to the petition on the merits in every respect, particularly with reference to the allegations containe | 1 | 1 |
G & P Electric Co. v. Dumont Construction Co.green2 sentences1968Co., 194 Cal.App.2d 868, 884 [ 15 Cal.Rptr. 757 ] ; Horney v. Horney, 118 Cal.App.2d 679, 682-683 [ 258 P.2d 555 ].) However, where a case is tried on the theory that a matter is in issue and evidence thereon is received without objection, it is too late, on appeal, to attack the finding. (2 Witkin, Cal. Procedure (1954) Trial, § 116, pp. 1848-1849.) The record in this case discloses that at the inception of the hearing, respondents ’ counsel advised the trial court that his clients objected to the petition on the merits in every respect, particularly with reference to the allegations containe 1968Co., 194 Cal.App.2d 868, 884 [ 15 Cal.Rptr. 757 ] ; Horney v. Horney, 118 Cal.App.2d 679, 682-683 [ 258 P.2d 555 ].) However, where a case is tried on the theory that a matter is in issue and evidence thereon is received without objection, it is too late, on appeal, to attack the finding. (2 Witkin, Cal. Procedure (1954) Trial, § 116, pp. 1848-1849.) The record in this case discloses that at the inception of the hearing, respondents ’ counsel advised the trial court that his clients objected to the petition on the merits in every respect, particularly with reference to the allegations containe | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. East Bay Union of MacHinists, Local 1304
green
2 sentences2023We now deny that request because the information attached to the request is irrelevant. 5 Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. East Bay Union of Machinists (1964) 227 Cal.App.2d 675, 698 .) At the inception of the hearing, defense counsel informed the court there was a binder, a copy of which had previously been provided to opposing counsel, but there was no express request that the court read it before hearing testimony. 2023(Haskell v. Carli (1987) 195 Cal.App.3d 124, 129 , citing Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. East Bay Union of Machinists (1964) 227 Cal.App.2d 675, 698 .) 5 At the inception of the hearing, defense counsel informed the court there was a binder, a copy of which had previously been provided to opposing counsel, but there was no express request that the court read it before hearing testimony. | 2 | 2023–2023 |
Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.
green
2 sentences1998The theory of comparative negligence was first adopted in Li v. Yellow Cab Co. (1975) 13 Cal.3d 804 [ 119 Cal.Rptr. 858 , 532 P.2d 1226 , 78 A.L.R.3d 393 ], where the court allowed a reduction of a plaintiff’s recovery by the degree of fault attributed to the plaintiff’s actions. 1998The theory of comparative negligence was first adopted in Li v. Yellow Cab Co. (1975) 13 Cal.3d 804 [ 119 Cal.Rptr. 858 , 532 P.2d 1226 , 78 A.L.R.3d 393 ], where the court allowed a reduction of a plaintiff’s recovery by the degree of fault attributed to the plaintiff’s actions. | 2 | 1998–1998 |
Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Nest-Kart
green
2 sentences1998(Daly v. General Motors Corp. (1978) 20 Cal.3d 725 [ 144 Cal.Rptr. 380 , 575 P.2d 1162 ]; Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Nest-Kart, supra, 21 Cal.3d 322 .) Almost from the inception of the doctrine of comparative negligence, the court has extended it to cases other than those based expressly on negligence. 1998To the contrary, there is long-standing Supreme Court authority allocating fault between strictly liable and negligent defendants. ( Daly v. General Motors Corp. (1978) 20 Cal.3d 725 [ 144 Cal. Rptr. 380 , 575 P.2d 1162 ]; Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Nest-Kart, supra, 21 Cal.3d 322 .) Almost from the inception of the doctrine of comparative negligence, the court has extended it to cases other than those based expressly on negligence. | 2 | 1998–1998 |
Daly v. General Motors Corp.
green
2 sentences1998(Daly v. General Motors Corp. (1978) 20 Cal.3d 725 [ 144 Cal.Rptr. 380 , 575 P.2d 1162 ]; Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Nest-Kart, supra, 21 Cal.3d 322 .) Almost from the inception of the doctrine of comparative negligence, the court has extended it to cases other than those based expressly on negligence. 1998(Daly v. General Motors Corp. (1978) 20 Cal.3d 725 [ 144 Cal.Rptr. 380 , 575 P.2d 1162 ]; Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Nest-Kart, supra, 21 Cal.3d 322 .) Almost from the inception of the doctrine of comparative negligence, the court has extended it to cases other than those based expressly on negligence. | 2 | 1998–1998 |
People v. Padilla
neutral
2 sentences1926(De Necochea v. Curtis, 80 Cal. 402, 405 [ 20 Pac. 563 , 22 Pac. 198 ]; Wells v. Mantes, 99 Cal. 584 [ 34 Pac. 324 ]; Alta Land Co. v. Hancock, 85 Cal. 223 [20 Am, St. 1915(De Necochea v. Curtis, 80 Cal. 402, 405 , [ 20 Pac. 563 , 22 Pac. 198 ]; Wells v. Mantes, 99 Cal. 584 , [ 34 Pac. 324 ]; Alta Land Co. v. Hancock, 85 Cal. 223 , [ 20 Am. | 2 | 1915–1926 |
Carrero v. Morales-Díaz
green
2 sentences1926(De Necochea v. Curtis, 80 Cal. 402, 405 [ 20 Pac. 563 , 22 Pac. 198 ]; Wells v. Mantes, 99 Cal. 584 [ 34 Pac. 324 ]; Alta Land Co. v. Hancock, 85 Cal. 223 [20 Am, St. 1915(De Necochea v. Curtis, 80 Cal. 402, 405 , [ 20 Pac. 563 , 22 Pac. 198 ]; Wells v. Mantes, 99 Cal. 584 , [ 34 Pac. 324 ]; Alta Land Co. v. Hancock, 85 Cal. 223 , [ 20 Am. | 2 | 1915–1926 |
De Necochea v. Curtis
green
2 sentences1926(De Necochea v. Curtis, 80 Cal. 402, 405 [ 20 Pac. 563 , 22 Pac. 198 ]; Wells v. Mantes, 99 Cal. 584 [ 34 Pac. 324 ]; Alta Land Co. v. Hancock, 85 Cal. 223 [20 Am, St. 1915(De Necochea v. Curtis, 80 Cal. 402, 405 , [ 20 Pac. 563 , 22 Pac. 198 ]; Wells v. Mantes, 99 Cal. 584 , [ 34 Pac. 324 ]; Alta Land Co. v. Hancock, 85 Cal. 223 , [ 20 Am. | 2 | 1915–1926 |
Broder v. Water Co.
green
2 sentences1886In Broder v. Water Company, 101 U. S. 274 , it appeared: In the year 1853 the defendant completed a canal through which it had continuously conducted waters and distributed them for mining,, agricultural, and other uses; that a portion of the land through which the canal ran was included in the land granted to the Pacific Railroad (under whom plaintiff claimed), by the act of July 2, 1864; that the plaintiff also claimed as a preemptor, the inception of his claim as such being a declaratory statement filed August 6, 1866. 1886In Broder v. Water Company, 101 U. S. 274 , it appeared: In the year 1853 the defendant completed a canal through which it had continuously conducted waters and distributed them for mining,, agricultural, and other uses; that a portion of the land through which the canal ran was included in the land granted to the Pacific Railroad (under whom plaintiff claimed), by the act of July 2, 1864; that the plaintiff also claimed as a preemptor, the inception of his claim as such being a declaratory statement filed August 6, 1866. | 2 | 1886–1886 |
Haskell v. Carli
green
1 sentence2023(Haskell v. Carli (1987) 195 Cal.App.3d 124, 129 , citing Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. East Bay Union of Machinists (1964) 227 Cal.App.2d 675, 698 .) 5 At the inception of the hearing, defense counsel informed the court there was a binder, a copy of which had previously been provided to opposing counsel, but there was no express request that the court read it before hearing testimony. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
California Hotel & Motel Ass'n v. Industrial Welfare Commission
green
1 sentence1998“A court must ensure that an agency has adequately considered all relevant factors, and has demonstrated a rational connection between those factors, the choice made, and the purposes of the enabling statute.” (California Hotel, supra, 25 Cal.3d at p. 212 , fn. omitted.) The reviewing court thus has the obligation at the inception of its analysis to determine whether the ■agency has demonstrated a rational connection between the basis for its decision and the purposes of the enabling statute. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Gale v. York Center Community Cooperative, Inc.
green
2 sentences1989(Gale v. York Center Community Cooperative, Inc. (1960) 21 Ill.2d 86 [ 171 N.E.2d 30 ].) In Gale, supra, the Illinois Supreme Court observed: “[T]he crucial inquiry should be directed at the utility of the restraint as compared with the injurious consequences that will flow from its enforcement. 1989(Gale v. York Center Community Cooperative, Inc. (1960) 21 Ill.2d 86 [ 171 N.E.2d 30 ].) In Gale, supra, the Illinois Supreme Court observed: “[T]he crucial inquiry should be directed at the utility of the restraint as compared with the injurious consequences that will flow from its enforcement. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Webb v. Baird
green
1 sentence1986Furthermore, expanding concepts in law have increased the volume of assignments, the complexity of the issues involved, and a mushrooming of the duties involved in an appointed case.” Even at the time of Rowe, the myth that lawyers occupied a special station, and were obliged thereby to render free legal services to indigents, was laid to rest in Indiana in Webb v. Baird (1854) 6 Ind. 13 . | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Anselmo v. Sebastiani
green
2 sentences1958Anselmo v. Sehastiani, 219 Cal. 292 [ 26 P.2d 1 ], is directly in point. 1958Anselmo v. Sehastiani, 219 Cal. 292 [ 26 P.2d 1 ], is directly in point. | 1 | 1958–1958 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.