pistol or revolver violation in Connecticut

2025On appeal, the defendant claims, inter alia, that the court violated his right to self-representation under the sixth 1 See North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 37 , 91 S. Ct. 160 , 27 L.

2025On appeal, the defendant claims, inter alia, that the court violated his right to self-representation under the sixth 1 See North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 37 , 91 S. Ct. 160 , 27 L.

2025In accordance with the plea agreement, he was 6 At the January 12, 2023 hearing, the prosecutor indicated that defense counsel had filed a motion for a hearing pursuant to Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 , 155–56, 98 S. Ct. 2674 , 57 L.

2025In accordance with the plea agreement, he was 6 At the January 12, 2023 hearing, the prosecutor indicated that defense counsel had filed a motion for a hearing pursuant to Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 , 155–56, 98 S. Ct. 2674 , 57 L.

2022State v. Coney, 266 Conn. 787, 790 , 835 A.2d 977 (2003).

2022State v. Coney, 266 Conn. 787, 790 , 835 A.2d 977 (2003).

2021I believe that the majority’s painstaking dissection of the jury verdict in this case is wholly inconsistent with the analysis in our very recent decision in State v. Rhodes, 335 Conn. 226 , 249 A.3d 683 (2020), which emphasized in no uncertain terms that, in cases con- cerning constructive possession, this court does not sit as a ‘‘seventh juror’’; (internal quotation marks omitted) id., 251; given our obligation to ‘‘construe the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict and then determine whether, on the basis of those facts and the inferences reasonably drawn from them

2021Subsequently, the state filed an amended long form information charging the defen- dant with criminal possession of a pistol or revolver in violation of § 53a-217c and criminal trespass in violation of General Statutes § 53a-109 (a) (1). . . . [Following a trial] [t]he jury found the defendant guilty of both charges.’’ (Citation omitted; footnote added; footnotes in original; footnote omitted.) State v. Dawson, 188 Conn. App. 532 , 536–41, 205 A.3d 662 (2019).

2021Subsequently, the state filed an amended long form information charging the defen- dant with criminal possession of a pistol or revolver in violation of § 53a-217c and criminal trespass in violation of General Statutes § 53a-109 (a) (1). . . . [Following a trial] [t]he jury found the defendant guilty of both charges.’’ (Citation omitted; footnote added; footnotes in original; footnote omitted.) State v. Dawson, 188 Conn. App. 532 , 536–41, 205 A.3d 662 (2019).

2018All of the counts were tried concurrently. 1 On March 31, 2000, the [petitioner] was found guilty on all three counts and later was sentenced to a total effective sentence of seventy years incarceration." (Footnote added.) Id., at 114-15, 826 A.2d 241 .

2018Id., at 214, 941 A.2d 378 .

2017The defendant also appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a trial to the court, of criminal possession of a pistol or revolver in violation of General Statutes § 53a-217. 1 On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) overruled his objection to the state's use of a peremptory challenge to strike an African-American prospective juror; (2) admitted a tape-recorded statement of a witness pursuant to State v. Whelan , 200 Conn. 743 , 753, 513 A.2d 86 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 994 , 107 S.Ct. 597 , 93 L.Ed.2d 598 (1986) ; and (3) permitted the state to cross-e

2017The defendant also appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a trial to the court, of criminal possession of a pistol or revolver in violation of General Statutes § 53a-217. 1 On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) overruled his objection to the state's use of a peremptory challenge to strike an African-American prospective juror; (2) admitted a tape-recorded statement of a witness pursuant to State v. Whelan , 200 Conn. 743 , 753, 513 A.2d 86 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 994 , 107 S.Ct. 597 , 93 L.Ed.2d 598 (1986) ; and (3) permitted the state to cross-e

2017The defendant also appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a trial to the court, of criminal possession of a pistol or revolver in violation of General Statutes § 53a-217.1On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improp- erly (1) overruled his objection to the state’s use of a peremptory challenge to strike an African-American prospective juror; (2) admitted a tape-recorded state- ment of a witness pursuant to State v. Whelan, 200 Conn. 743, 753 , 513 A.2d 86 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 994 , 107 S. Ct. 597 , 93 L.

2017The defendant also appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a trial to the court, of criminal possession of a pistol or revolver in violation of General Statutes § 53a-217. 1 On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) overruled his objection to the state's use of a peremptory challenge to strike an African-American prospective juror; (2) admitted a tape-recorded statement of a witness pursuant to State v. Whelan , 200 Conn. 743 , 753, 513 A.2d 86 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 994 , 107 S.Ct. 597 , 93 L.Ed.2d 598 (1986) ; and (3) permitted the state to cross-e

2017The defendant also appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a trial to the court, of criminal possession of a pistol or revolver in violation of General Statutes § 53a-217.1On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improp- erly (1) overruled his objection to the state’s use of a peremptory challenge to strike an African-American prospective juror; (2) admitted a tape-recorded state- ment of a witness pursuant to State v. Whelan, 200 Conn. 743, 753 , 513 A.2d 86 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 994 , 107 S. Ct. 597 , 93 L.

2017The defendant also appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a trial to the court, of criminal possession of a pistol or revolver in violation of General Statutes § 53a-217. 1 On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) overruled his objection to the state's use of a peremptory challenge to strike an African-American prospective juror; (2) admitted a tape-recorded statement of a witness pursuant to State v. Whelan , 200 Conn. 743 , 753, 513 A.2d 86 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 994 , 107 S.Ct. 597 , 93 L.Ed.2d 598 (1986) ; and (3) permitted the state to cross-e

2017The defendant also appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a trial to the court, of criminal possession of a pistol or revolver in violation of General Statutes § 53a-217.1On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improp- erly (1) overruled his objection to the state’s use of a peremptory challenge to strike an African-American prospective juror; (2) admitted a tape-recorded state- ment of a witness pursuant to State v. Whelan, 200 Conn. 743, 753 , 513 A.2d 86 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 994 , 107 S. Ct. 597 , 93 L.

2017The defendant also appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a trial to the court, of criminal possession of a pistol or revolver in violation of General Statutes § 53a-217. 1 On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) overruled his objection to the state's use of a peremptory challenge to strike an African-American prospective juror; (2) admitted a tape-recorded statement of a witness pursuant to State v. Whelan , 200 Conn. 743 , 753, 513 A.2d 86 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 994 , 107 S.Ct. 597 , 93 L.Ed.2d 598 (1986) ; and (3) permitted the state to cross-e

2015State v. Hilton, supra, 79 Conn. App. 155 .

2002Following the decision of that court affirming the judgment of conviction; State v. Clark, 62 Conn. App. 182, 184 , 774 A.2d 183 (2001); we granted the defendant’s petition for certification to appeal, limited to the following issues: “1.

2002Following the decision of that court affirming the judgment of conviction; State v. Clark, 62 Conn. App. 182, 184 , 774 A.2d 183 (2001); we granted the defendant’s petition for certification to appeal, limited to the following issues: “1.

2002The Appellate Court reversed in part the trial court’s judgment, upholding the defendant’s convictions of murder as an accessory and criminal possession of a pistol or revolver, but setting aside his conviction of conspiracy to commit murder on the ground of insufficient evidence. 6 See State v. Green, 62 Conn. App. 217, 247-48 , 774 A.2d 157 (2001).

2002The Appellate Court reversed in part the trial court’s judgment, upholding the defendant’s convictions of murder as an accessory and criminal possession of a pistol or revolver, but setting aside his conviction of conspiracy to commit murder on the ground of insufficient evidence. 6 See State v. Green, 62 Conn. App. 217, 247-48 , 774 A.2d 157 (2001).

2001The decision of the trial court is therefore reversible on appeal only if there has been an abuse of discretion.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. McIntyre, 250 Conn. 526, 533 , 737 A.2d 392 (1999), quoting State v. Newsome, 238 Conn. 588, 628-29 , 682 A.2d 972 (1996).

2001The decision of the trial court is therefore reversible on appeal only if there has been an abuse of discretion.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. McIntyre, 250 Conn. 526, 533 , 737 A.2d 392 (1999), quoting State v. Newsome, 238 Conn. 588, 628-29 , 682 A.2d 972 (1996).

2001The decision of the trial court is therefore reversible on appeal only if there has been an abuse of discretion.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. McIntyre, 250 Conn. 526, 533 , 737 A.2d 392 (1999), quoting State v. Newsome, 238 Conn. 588, 628-29 , 682 A.2d 972 (1996).

2001The decision of the trial court is therefore reversible on appeal only if there has been an abuse of discretion.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. McIntyre, 250 Conn. 526, 533 , 737 A.2d 392 (1999), quoting State v. Newsome, 238 Conn. 588, 628-29 , 682 A.2d 972 (1996).