Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
13 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1976–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. Barthgreen2 sentences2018Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. Barth, 103 Ill. 2d 536, 539 (1984). 2017Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. Barth , 103 Ill. 2d 536 , 539, 83 Ill.Dec. 332 , 470 N.E.2d 290 (1984). | 2 | 3 |
United States v. Phillipsgreen2 sentences2011See United States v. Phillips, 596 F.3d 414, 417 (7th Cir. 2010) (finding admission into evidence of redacted audio recording was not in error where defendant’s only basis for exclusion was that the recording was redacted). 2011See United States v. Phillips, 596 F.3d 414, 417 (7th Cir. 2010) (finding admission into evidence of redacted audio recording was not in error where defendant’s only basis for exclusion was that the recording was redacted). | 2 | 2 |
In Re APgreen2 sentences2004In In re A.P., 179 Ill. 2d 184 (1997), which was a case arising under the Juvenile Court Act, our supreme court acknowledged that the “form of corroboration will vary depending on the facts of each case and can include physical or circumstantial evidence.” In re A.P, 179 Ill. 2d at 199 . 2004In In re A.P., 179 Ill. 2d 184 (1997), which was a case arising under the Juvenile Court Act, our supreme court acknowledged that the “form of corroboration will vary depending on the facts of each case and can include physical or circumstantial evidence.” In re A.P, 179 Ill. 2d at 199 . | 1 | 2 |
People v. Molstadgreen1 sentence2025As the State now notes, McCaskill and Bradley could have participated as defense witnesses without waiving their fifth amendment privilege but inexplicably chose not to do so. 15 Cf. Molstad, 101 Ill. 2d at 134-35 (granting a new trial based on exonerating affidavits of the codefendants, delivered to the defendant’s attorney after the codefendants were convicted but before they were sentenced). | 1 | 1 |
Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mutual Insurancegreen1 sentence2020The parties agree that abuse of discretion is the applicable standard of review in evaluating whether the circuit court erred in denying Bradley’s motion to stay (see Jiotis, 2014 IL App (2d) 121293, ¶ 22 ), and they likewise agree that de novo review applies to whether the circuit court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of Direct Auto (Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 154 Ill. 2d 90, 102 (1992)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
PML Development LLC v. Village of Hawthorn Woods
green
1 sentence2025Where a reconsideration motion “was based on new matters, such as additional facts or new arguments or legal theories not presented during the course of the proceedings leading to the order being challenged, the abuse-of-discretion standard applies.” Id. at ¶ 26. “[A] trial court is well within its discretion to deny such a motion [to reconsider] and ignore its contents when it contains material that was available prior to the hearing at issue but never presented.” (Internal quotations omitted.) Id. at ¶ 27. ¶ 35 Bradley argues that the circuit court erroneously granted summary judgment becaus | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Urso v. Bradley University
neutral
1 sentence2023CONCLUSION ¶ 48 For the reasons stated, we affirm the trial court’s judgment. ¶ 49 Affirmed. - 20 - Urso v. Bradley University, 2023 IL App (4th) 230165 Decision Under Review: Appeal from the Circuit Court of Peoria County, No. 18-L-116; the Hon. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Willett v. Cessna Aircraft Co.
green
1 sentence2020While “[a] Celotex-type motion is appropriate only when the nonmovant has had an adequate opportunity to conduct discovery” (Willett, 366 Ill. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Jiotis v. The Burr Ridge Park District
green
1 sentence2020The parties agree that abuse of discretion is the applicable standard of review in evaluating whether the circuit court erred in denying Bradley’s motion to stay (see Jiotis, 2014 IL App (2d) 121293, ¶ 22 ), and they likewise agree that de novo review applies to whether the circuit court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of Direct Auto (Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 154 Ill. 2d 90, 102 (1992)). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Zippo Manufacturing Company v. Rogers Imports, Inc.
green
1 sentence1978La. 1970), 320 F. Supp. 275 , appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction (5th Cir. 1970), 432 F.2d 556 ; Zippo Manufacturing Co. v. Rogers Imports, Inc. (S.D.N.Y. 1963), 216 F. Supp. 670 , thus we will first analyze the approach of these cases. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
United States v. Edward Grady Partin
green
1 sentence1978La. 1970), 320 F. Supp. 275 , appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction (5th Cir. 1970), 432 F.2d 556 ; Zippo Manufacturing Co. v. Rogers Imports, Inc. (S.D.N.Y. 1963), 216 F. Supp. 670 , thus we will first analyze the approach of these cases. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Holiday Inns, Inc. v. Holiday Out in America and Holiday Out in America at St. Lucie, Inc.
green
1 sentence1978The circuit court cited three cases in its August 19, 1977, order denying Bradley’s motion for vacation of judgment and for new trial, Holiday Inns, Inc. v. Holiday Out In America (5th Cir. 1973), 481 F.2d 445 ; United States v. Partin (E.D. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
United States v. Partin
green
1 sentence1978La. 1970), 320 F. Supp. 275 , appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction (5th Cir. 1970), 432 F.2d 556 ; Zippo Manufacturing Co. v. Rogers Imports, Inc. (S.D.N.Y. 1963), 216 F. Supp. 670 , thus we will first analyze the approach of these cases. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
People v. Odom
neutral
1 sentence1976App. 2d 480 , 218 N.E.2d 116 ), there is no evidence that the public defender here conducted Bradley’s defense during this time so incompetently as to constitute a deprivation of the constitutional guarantee. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.