Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
13 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Naugreen2 sentences2007See Nau, 153 Ill.2d at 417 , 180 Ill.Dec. 240 , 607 N.E.2d 134 (failure to object to issue at hearing on involuntary commitment results in issue's forfeiture). 2007See Nau, 153 Ill. 2d at 417 (failure to object to issue at hearing on involuntary commitment results in issue’s forfeiture). | 2 | 2 |
People v. Mark P.green2 sentences2013App. 3d 173, 177 , 932 N.E.2d 481, 485 (2010), also cited by defendant, the Second District held the trial court should have exercised its discretion in determining whether the defendant should have been restrained at an involuntary commitment hearing and had some factual basis for the restraints other than they would have no effect on the court’s judgment. ¶ 23 After reviewing the relevant case law on shackling, we turn to the nature of postconviction proceedings. 2010Yet, the majority also seems to allude to a requirement for a trial court to hold a Boose hearing for "a respondent." The majority, thus, does not define whether it is describing all respondents in civil commitment hearings, or "anyone appearing before a judge for trial." Op. 342 Ill.Dec. at 357 , 932 N.E.2d at 484 . | 1 | 2 |
In Re Adoption of Walgreengreen2 sentences2009Given the importance of the issues raised, we find that “there is a ‘need to make an authoritative determination for future guidance of public officers’ ” (In re Alfred H.H., 233 Ill. 2d 345 , 357 (2009), quoting In re Adoption of Walgreen, 186 Ill. 2d 362, 365 , 710 N.E.2d 1226, 1227 (1999)). 2009Given the importance of the issues raised, we find that “there is a ‘need to make an authoritative determination for future guidance of public officers’ ” (In re Alfred H.H., 233 Ill. 2d 345 , 357 (2009), quoting In re Adoption of Walgreen, 186 Ill. 2d 362, 365 , 710 N.E.2d 1226, 1227 (1999)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Barbara H.
green
2 sentences2004Barbara H., 183 Ill.2d at 494-96 , 234 Ill. 2004Barbara H., 183 Ill.2d at 494-96 , 234 Ill. | 2 | 2004–2004 |
People v. Lawrence S.
green
2 sentences2003Lawrence S., 319 Ill. 2003Lawrence S. , 319 Ill. | 2 | 2003–2003 |
Vitek v. Jones
green
2 sentences2001Vitek, 445 U.S. at 491-94 , 63 L. 2001Vitek, 445 U.S. at 491-94 , 63 L. | 2 | 2001–2001 |
People v. Watts
green
1 sentence2025In rejecting this argument, we explained that “[b]ecause involuntary commitment proceedings affect important liberty interests, strict compliance with statutory procedures is required,” but “reversal is not required unless [the] respondent is in some way prejudiced by the failure to comply with the statutory requirements.” Watts, 250 Ill. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
In Re Alfred HH
green
1 sentence2009Given the importance of the issues raised, we find that “there is a ‘need to make an authoritative determination for future guidance of public officers’ ” (In re Alfred H.H., 233 Ill. 2d 345 , 357 (2009), quoting In re Adoption of Walgreen, 186 Ill. 2d 362, 365 , 710 N.E.2d 1226, 1227 (1999)). | 1 | 2009–2009 |
People v. Weimer
green
1 sentence1993Weimer, 219 Ill. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.