Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
13 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1995–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Moy v. County of Cookgreen2 sentences1995The doctrine of respondeat superior allows an injured party to hold a principal vicariously liable for the conduct of his or her agent. ( Moy v. County of Cook (1994), 159 Ill.2d 519, 523 , 203 Ill.Dec. 776 , 640 N.E.2d 926 .) The issue whether one is an agent or an independent contractor is generally a question of fact, unless the relationship is so clear as to be undisputed. ( Gasbarra v. St. 1995The doctrine of respondeat superior allows an injured party to hold a principal vicariously liable for the conduct of his or her agent. ( Moy v. County of Cook (1994), 159 Ill.2d 519, 523 , 203 Ill.Dec. 776 , 640 N.E.2d 926 .) The issue whether one is an agent or an independent contractor is generally a question of fact, unless the relationship is so clear as to be undisputed. ( Gasbarra v. St. | 7 | 8 |
Daniels v. Corrigangreen2 sentences2011App. 3d 66, 75 , 886 N.E.2d 1193, 1203-04 (2008) (“The doctrine of respondeat superior allows an injured party to hold a principal vicariously liable for the conduct of his or her agent.”). 2011App. 3d 66, 75 , 886 N.E.2d 1193, 1203-04 (2008) (“The doctrine of respondeat superior allows an injured party to hold a principal vicariously liable for the conduct of his or her agent”). | 2 | 4 |
O'BANNER v. McDonald's Corp.green2 sentences2014Respondeat Superior - Actual Agency ¶ 180 "The doctrine of respondeat superior allows an injured party to hold a principal vicariously liable for the conduct of his or her agent." O'Banner v. McDonald's Corp., 273 Ill. 2014Respondeat Superior–Actual Agency ¶ 180 “The doctrine of respondeat superior allows an injured party to hold a principal vicariously liable for the conduct of his or her agent.” O’Banner v. McDonald’s Corp., 273 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
Oliveira-Brooks v. Re/Max International, Inc.green1 sentence2020Oliveira-Brooks v. Re/Max International, Inc., 372 Ill. App. 3d 127, 134 (2007). | 1 | 1 |
Bagent v. Blessing Care Corp.green1 sentence2013Bagent v. Blessing Care Corp., 224 Ill. 2d 154, 163 (2007); Moy v. County of Cook, 159 Ill. 2d 519, 523 (1994). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
O'BANNER v. McDonald's Corp.
green
2 sentences2014App. 3d 588, 592 (1995) (citing Moy v. County of Cook, 159 Ill. 2d 519, 523 (1994)), rev'd on other grounds, 173 Ill. 2d 208 (1996). 2014App. 3d 588, 592 (1995) (citing Moy v. County of Cook, 159 Ill. 2d 519, 523 (1994)), rev’d on other grounds, 173 Ill. 2d 208 (1996). | 2 | 2014–2014 |
Jacobs v. Yellow Cab Affiliation, Inc.
green
1 sentence2017Id. ¶ 66 i. Actual Authority ¶ 67 The doctrine of respondeat superior allows an injured party to hold a principal vicariously liable for the conduct of its agent. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Gasbarra v. St. James Hospital
green
2 sentences1995James Hospital (1979), 85 Ill.App.3d 32, 43 , 40 Ill.Dec. 538 , 406 N.E.2d 544 .) Whether an actual agency has in fact been created is determined by the relations of the parties as they exist under their agreements or acts, with the question being ultimately one of intention. 3 Am.Jur.2d, Agency § 21 (1986). [1] *1270 The record in this case establishes that the franchisees who owned and operated the restaurant located at 29 East 87th Street in Chicago were not McDonald's Corporation's actual agents. 1995James Hospital (1979), 85 Ill.App.3d 32, 43 , 40 Ill.Dec. 538 , 406 N.E.2d 544 .) Whether an actual agency has in fact been created is determined by the relations of the parties as they exist under their agreements or acts, with the question being ultimately one of intention. 3 Am.Jur.2d, Agency § 21 (1986). [1] *1270 The record in this case establishes that the franchisees who owned and operated the restaurant located at 29 East 87th Street in Chicago were not McDonald's Corporation's actual agents. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.