Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
13 Indiana opinions name it 1 courts 1986–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
S & S Enterprises v. Marathon Ashland Petroleum, LLCgreen2 sentences2017“The theory behind the bona fide purchaser defense is that every reasonable effort should be made to protect a purchaser of legal title for a valuable consideration without notice of a legal defect.” S & S Enter. v. Marathon Ashland Petroleum, LLC, 799 N.E.2d 18, 23 (Ind. Ct. App. 2003). 2010"The theory behind the bona fide purchaser defense is that every reasonable effort should be made to protect a purchaser of legal title for a valuable consideration without notice of a legal defect." Kumar v. Bay Bridge, LLC, 903 N.E.2d 114, 116 (Ind.Ct.App.2009) (quoting S & S Enter. v. Marathon Ashland Petroleum, LLC, 799 N.E.2d 18, 23 (Ind.Ct.App.2003)). 3 To establish that the Lease in the instant case is void as a matter of law, it was incumbent upon Park P as the movant for summary judgment to designate undisputed evidentiary material that demonstrates that, at the time Park P purchased | 3 | 3 |
Bank of New York v. Nallygreen2 sentences2017“In order to qualify as a bona fide purchaser, one must purchase in good faith, for valuable consideration, and without notice of the outstanding rights of others.” Bank of N.Y. v. Nally, 820 N.E.2d 644, 648 (Ind. 2005) (emphasis added). 2009"The law recognizes both constructive and actual notice." Bank of New York v. Nally, 820 N.E.2d 644, 648 (Ind.2005). | 2 | 2 |
Keybank National Ass'n v. NBD Bankgreen2 sentences2009Consistent with the recording statute, Indiana has long recognized the bona fide purchaser doctrine. "[Tlo qualify as a bona fide purchaser, one has to purchase in good faith, for a valuable consideration, and without notice of the outstanding rights of others." Keybank Nat'l Ass'n v. NBD Bank, 699 N.E.2d 322, 327 (Ind.Ct.App.1998). 2007“The theory behind the bona fide purchaser defense is that every reasonable effort should be made to protect a purchaser of legal title for a valuable consideration without notice of a legal defect.” Id. at 327 . | 1 | 5 |
Kumar v. Bay Bridge, LLCgreen2 sentences2010"The theory behind the bona fide purchaser defense is that every reasonable effort should be made to protect a purchaser of legal title for a valuable consideration without notice of a legal defect." Kumar v. Bay Bridge, LLC, 903 N.E.2d 114, 116 (Ind.Ct.App.2009) (quoting S & S Enter. v. Marathon Ashland Petroleum, LLC, 799 N.E.2d 18, 23 (Ind.Ct.App.2003)). 3 To establish that the Lease in the instant case is void as a matter of law, it was incumbent upon Park P as the movant for summary judgment to designate undisputed evidentiary material that demonstrates that, at the time Park P purchased 2010"The theory behind the bona fide purchaser defense is that every reasonable effort should be made to protect a purchaser of legal title for a valuable consideration without notice of a legal defect." Id. (citation omitted). | 1 | 3 |
Weathersby v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.green1 sentence2018See Weathersby v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. , 906 N.E.2d 904 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009) (discussing the doctrine of bona fide purchaser in the context of a property dispute). | 1 | 1 |
INB Trust No. 337 v. Veljanoskigreen1 sentence2000This court has acknowledged the soundness of the doctrine of bona fide purchaser, but has also recognized that “ ‘[t]he doctrine ... is purely an equitable one, and should not be extended farther than equitable principles warrant.’ ” INB Trust No. 337 v. Veljanoski, 593 N.E.2d 1263, 1265 (Ind.Ct.App.1992) (citations omitted), trans. denied. | 1 | 1 |
Lamb v. Lambgreen1 sentence1998Lamb v. Lamb, 569 N.E.2d 992, 994 (Ind.Ct.App.1991). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Clarkson v. Neff
green
1 sentence2019Clarkson v. Neff , 878 N.E.2d 240 , 244 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007), trans. denied . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Meyer v. Marine Builders, Inc.
green
1 sentence2018Meyer , 797 N.E.2d at 774 . [27] Consistent with the recording statute, Indiana recognizes the bona fide purchaser doctrine. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Huntingburg Production Credit Ass'n v. Griese
green
2 sentences1986Dicus v. Ripley County Bank, Osgood, Indiana (1984), Ind. App., 471 N.E.2d 1257 ; Huntingburg Production Credit Association v. Griese (1983), Ind. App., 456 N.E.2d 448 . 1986Dicus v. Ripley County Bank, Osgood, Indiana (1984), Ind.App., 471 N.E.2d 1257 ; Huntingburg Production Credit Association v. Griese (1983), Ind.App., 456 N.E.2d 448 . | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Dicus v. Ripley County Bank, Osgood, Indiana 47037
green
2 sentences1986Dicus v. Ripley County Bank, Osgood, Indiana (1984), Ind. App., 471 N.E.2d 1257 ; Huntingburg Production Credit Association v. Griese (1983), Ind. App., 456 N.E.2d 448 . 1986Dicus v. Ripley County Bank, Osgood, Indiana (1984), Ind.App., 471 N.E.2d 1257 ; Huntingburg Production Credit Association v. Griese (1983), Ind.App., 456 N.E.2d 448 . | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.