Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
13 Louisiana opinions name it 1 courts 1993–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Captvillegreen1 sentence2015Under this standard, the appellate court “must determine that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, was sufficient to convince a rational trier of fact- that all of - the elements of the crime had been proved beyond a reasonable doubt.” State v. Neal, 00-0674, (La.6/29/01) 796 So.2d 649, 657 (citing State v. Captville, 448 So.2d 676, 678 (La.1984)). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Nealgreen1 sentence2015Under this standard, the appellate court “must determine that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, was sufficient to convince a rational trier of fact- that all of - the elements of the crime had been proved beyond a reasonable doubt.” State v. Neal, 00-0674, (La.6/29/01) 796 So.2d 649, 657 (citing State v. Captville, 448 So.2d 676, 678 (La.1984)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Jackson v. Virginia
red
2 sentences2015The Louisiana Supreme Court noted in State v. Brown, 03-0897, p. 22 (La.4/12/05), 907 So.2d 1, 18 , the standard for determining an insufficiency of evidence claim is as follows: InWhen reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, Louisiana appellate courts are controlled by the standard , enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia, 448 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979). 2015The Louisiana Supreme Court noted in State v. Brown, 03-0897, p. 22 (La.4/12/05), 907 So.2d 1, 18 , the standard for determining an insufficiency of evidence claim is as follows: InWhen reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, Louisiana appellate courts are controlled by the standard , enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia, 448 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979). | 9 | 1999–2024 |
State v. Brown
green
2 sentences2016As the Louisiana Supreme Court noted in State v. Brown, 2003-0897, p. 22 (La. 4/12/05), 907 So.2d 1, 18 , the standard is as follows: When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, Louisiana appellate courts are controlled by the standard enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979). 2015The Louisiana Supreme Court noted in State v. Brown, 03-0897, p. 22 (La.4/12/05), 907 So.2d 1, 18 , the standard for determining an insufficiency of evidence claim is as follows: InWhen reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, Louisiana appellate courts are controlled by the standard , enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia, 448 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979). | 3 | 2015–2016 |
State v. Campbell
green
2 sentences2025App. 4 Cir. 6/24/15), 171 So. 3d 1176, 1182 . 2023“The standard for determining an insufficiency of evidence claim is well settled.” State v. Campbell, 2015-0017, p. 7 (La.App. 4 Cir. 6/24/15), 171 So. 3d 1176, 1182 . | 2 | 2023–2025 |
State of Louisiana v. Marcus Donte Reed
green
1 sentence2017The supreme court recently stated in State v. Reed, 14-1980, p. 20-21 (La. 9/7/16), 200 So.3d 291 : In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, an ap pellate court in Louisiana is controlled by the standard enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. Prieur
red
1 sentence2017Accordingly, because the defendant does not set forth a proper insufficiency of evidence claim, we find that this assignment of error lacks merit. 5 We turn to consideration of the defendant’s remaining assignments of error. | ^Notice of Prieur Hearing In his first assignment of error, the defendant argues that he did not receive sufficient notice of the hearing on the admissibility of other crimes evidence pursuant to State v. Prieur, 277 So.2d 126 (La. 1973), modified by State v. Taylor, 16-1124, 16-1183 (La. 12/1/16), — So.3d —. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. Miller
green
1 sentence2015In State v. Miller, 98-1873, p. 5 (La.App. 3 Cir. 10/13/99), 746 So.2d 118, 120 , writ denied, 99-3259 (La.5/5/00), 761 So.2d 541 , this court noted that the applicable standard of review utilized regarding an insufficiency of evidence claim as follows: [s[A]fter viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
State v. Miller
neutral
1 sentence2015In State v. Miller, 98-1873, p. 5 (La.App. 3 Cir. 10/13/99), 746 So.2d 118, 120 , writ denied, 99-3259 (La.5/5/00), 761 So.2d 541 , this court noted that the applicable standard of review utilized regarding an insufficiency of evidence claim as follows: [s[A]fter viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
State v. Ruff
green
1 sentence1993Under State v. Ruff, 504 So.2d 72 (La.App.2d Cir.), writ denied 508 So.2d 64 , 65 (La.1987), a reviewing court must consider a defendant's insufficiency of evidence claim even though he successfully proves a Brady violation. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
State v. Ruff
green
1 sentence1993Under State v. Ruff, 504 So.2d 72 (La.App.2d Cir.), writ denied 508 So.2d 64 , 65 (La.1987), a reviewing court must consider a defendant's insufficiency of evidence claim even though he successfully proves a Brady violation. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.