13 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1983–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Thomasgreen2 sentences2025Id.; State v. Thomas, 70 S.W.3d 496, 504 (Mo. App. E.D. 2002). 2023The circuit court is “not required to give equal weight to each of the listed factors, nor [is] it required to make an express finding on each one.” Id. (internal citation omitted). | 1 | 2 |
State v. Nathangreen1 sentence2023“Although required by [Section] 211.071 to consider the nature of the crimes charged in making a certification decision, the [circuit] court does not consider ‘whether the juvenile did (or did not) commit them.’” Int. of E.T.S., 663 S.W.3d at 826 (quoting State v. Nathan, 404 S.W.3d 253, 261 (Mo. banc 2013)). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Jonesgreen1 sentence2016Section 491.015.1 states, “evidence of specific instances of the complaining witness’ prior sexual conduct ... is inadmissible,” unless a listed exception applies. *57 4 If one of the exceptions is met under subsection 1, the evidence is admissible only to the extent that the evidence is also “relevant to a material fact or issue.” Section 491.015.2; State v. Jones, 716 S.W.2d 799, 800 (Mo.banc 1986). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Perrygreen1 sentence2002State v. Perry, 954 S.W.2d 554, 567 (Mo.App. | 1 | 1 |
Schudy v. Coopergreen2 sentences2001Schudy v. Cooper, 824 S.W.2d 899, 901 (Mo. banc 1992). 2001Schudy v. Cooper, 824 S.W.2d 899, 901 (Mo. banc 1992). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Garbegreen1 sentence1997State v. Seidel, 764 S.W.2d 517, 518 (Mo.App.1989); State v. Garbe, 740 S.W.2d 266, 268 (Mo.App.1987). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Seidelgreen1 sentence1997State v. Seidel, 764 S.W.2d 517, 518 (Mo.App.1989); State v. Garbe, 740 S.W.2d 266, 268 (Mo.App.1987). | 1 | 1 |
Jimmy Elem v. James Purkettgreen1 sentence1995In his supplemental brief defendant argues that the state must articulate plausible race-neutral reasons for believing that the listed factors would affect the venireperson’s ability to perform his or her duties as a juror, citing Elem v. Purkett, 25 F.3d 679, 683 (8th Cir.1994). 3 Defendant also relies on State v. Davis, 894 S.W.2d 703, 706 (Mo.App.1995) to support his position that the state must articulate more than facially legitimate reasons before the defendant must show that the state’s explanation is pretextual. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Davisgreen1 sentence1995In his supplemental brief defendant argues that the state must articulate plausible race-neutral reasons for believing that the listed factors would affect the venireperson’s ability to perform his or her duties as a juror, citing Elem v. Purkett, 25 F.3d 679, 683 (8th Cir.1994). 3 Defendant also relies on State v. Davis, 894 S.W.2d 703, 706 (Mo.App.1995) to support his position that the state must articulate more than facially legitimate reasons before the defendant must show that the state’s explanation is pretextual. | 1 | 1 |
Roberts v. Robertsgreen1 sentence1983We said in Roberts v. Roberts, 553 S.W.2d 305, 306 (Mo.App.1977), “the statute provides that among the factors to be considered is the father’s primary responsibility to support the children, but the mother may also be called upon to provide support.” Wife has cited two cases in which non custodial mothers have been ordered to pay child support. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hill v. Hill
green
2 sentences2003Id. at 116 . 2003Id. at 116 . | 2 | 2003–2003 |
State v. Woodworth
green
1 sentence2022“The certifying court need not give equal weight to each of the listed factors, nor is it required to make an express finding on each one.” Woodworth, 941 S.W.2d at 697 . | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Bright v. Bright
green
1 sentence2015Bright, 429 S.W.3d at 520 . 4 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Sandbothe v. City of Olivette
green
2 sentences2007Indeed, the language in Sandbothe referencing “the best interest of the public health, welfare, safety and morals” was contained in a separate sentence at the end of the ordinance, id., rather than as one of the listed factors specified in the ordinance now before us. 2007Indeed, the language in Sandbothe referencing "the best interest of the public health, welfare, safety and morals" was contained in a separate sentence at the end of the ordinance, id., rather than as one of the listed factors specified in the ordinance now before us. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.