Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
13 Nebraska opinions name it 2 courts 2017–2025 7 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nebraska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Haffke v. Signal 88green2 sentences2022See, also, Haffke v. Signal 88, 306 Neb. 625, 643 , 947 N.W.2d 103, 117 (2020) (“the touchstone is whether fair notice was provided”); Neb. 2022See, also, Haffke v. Signal 88, 306 Neb. 625, 643 , 947 N.W.2d 103, 117 (2020) (“the touchstone is whether fair notice was provided”); Neb. | 2 | 2 |
Edwards v. Estate of Clarkgreen2 sentences2025Accord Nesbitt v. Frakes, 300 Neb. 1 , 911 N.W.2d 598 (2018). 14 Edwards v. Estate of Clark, 313 Neb. 94 , 982 N.W.2d 788 (2022). 15 Id. - 487 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 320 Nebraska Reports RAMAEKERS V. 2025Accord Nesbitt v. Frakes, 300 Neb. 1 , 911 N.W.2d 598 (2018). 14 Edwards v. Estate of Clark, 313 Neb. 94 , 982 N.W.2d 788 (2022). 15 Id. - 487 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 320 Nebraska Reports RAMAEKERS V. | 1 | 2 |
Stewart v. Heinemangreen2 sentences2025Creighton counters that the district court did not err, and that all the claims are insufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss. (a) Principles Guiding Analysis of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State Claim Civil actions are controlled by a liberal pleading regime; a party is required to set forth only a short and plain state- ment of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief and is not required to plead legal theories or cite appropriate statutes so long as the pleading gives fair notice of the claims asserted. 14 The rationale for a liberal notice pleading standard in civi 2025Creighton counters that the district court did not err, and that all the claims are insufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss. (a) Principles Guiding Analysis of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State Claim Civil actions are controlled by a liberal pleading regime; a party is required to set forth only a short and plain state- ment of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief and is not required to plead legal theories or cite appropriate statutes so long as the pleading gives fair notice of the claims asserted. 14 The rationale for a liberal notice pleading standard in civi | 1 | 1 |
Nesbitt Ex Rel. Himself & All Other Similarly Situated Neb. State Penitentiary Segregated Prisoners v. Frakesgreen2 sentences2025Accord Nesbitt v. Frakes, 300 Neb. 1 , 911 N.W.2d 598 (2018). 14 Edwards v. Estate of Clark, 313 Neb. 94 , 982 N.W.2d 788 (2022). 15 Id. - 487 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 320 Nebraska Reports RAMAEKERS V. 2025Accord Nesbitt v. Frakes, 300 Neb. 1 , 911 N.W.2d 598 (2018). 14 Edwards v. Estate of Clark, 313 Neb. 94 , 982 N.W.2d 788 (2022). 15 Id. - 487 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 320 Nebraska Reports RAMAEKERS V. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Burklund v. Brad Fuehrer & Structure Techs., LLC
green
2 sentences2025Id. 2022Id. [16] In cases in which a plaintiff does not or cannot allege specific facts showing a necessary element, the factual allega- tions, taken as true, are nonetheless plausible if they suggest the existence of the element and raise a reasonable expectation that discovery will reveal evidence of the element or claim. | 4 | 2018–2025 |
Tryon v. City of North Platte
green
2 sentences2022The record does not support this contention. [14] Nebraska is a notice pleading jurisdiction, and civil actions are controlled by a liberal pleading regime. 38 A party is required to set forth only a short and plain statement of the claim showing the pleader’s entitlement to relief and is not required to plead legal theories or cite appropriate statutes so long as the pleading gives fair notice of the claims asserted. 39 The rationale for this liberal notice pleading standard is that when a party has a valid claim, he or she should recover on it regardless of a failure to perceive the true bas 2022The record does not support this contention. [14] Nebraska is a notice pleading jurisdiction, and civil actions are controlled by a liberal pleading regime. 38 A party is required to set forth only a short and plain statement of the claim showing the pleader’s entitlement to relief and is not required to plead legal theories or cite appropriate statutes so long as the pleading gives fair notice of the claims asserted. 39 The rationale for this liberal notice pleading standard is that when a party has a valid claim, he or she should recover on it regardless of a failure to perceive the true bas | 3 | 2017–2022 |
Rodriguez v. Catholic Health Initiatives
green
2 sentences2018Id. 2017The rationale for a liberal notice pleading standard in civil actions is that when a party has a valid claim, he or she should -2- Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 297 Nebraska R eports RODRIGUEZ v. CATHOLIC HEALTH INITIATIVES Cite as 297 Neb. 1 recover on it regardless of a failure to perceive the true basis of the claim at the pleading stage. 7. | 3 | 2017–2018 |
Eadie v. Leise Props., LLC
green
2 sentences2021Id. 2018In cases in which a plaintiff does not or cannot allege specific facts showing a necessary element, the factual allegations, taken as true, are nonetheless plausible if they suggest the existence of the element and raise a reasonable expectation that discovery will reveal evidence of the element or claim.11 [7,8] In order to prevail in a negligence action, a plaintiff must establish the defendant’s duty to protect the plaintiff from injury, a failure to discharge that duty, and damages proximately caused by the failure to discharge that duty.12 8 Rodriguez v. Catholic Health Initiatives, 297 N | 2 | 2018–2021 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.