has considered four factors (Nevada) · Go Syfert
← Nevada issues

has considered four factors in Nevada

13 Nevada opinions name it 1 courts 2015–2016 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Nevada courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
In Re Discipline of Lernergreen
nev · 2008 · cited in 13 Nevada opinions naming this issue, 2015–2016
2 sentences

2016SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A 41(2 '41E:2119 In determining the appropriate discipline, this court has considered four factors to be weighed: "the duty violated, the lawyer's mental state, the potential or actual injury caused by the lawyer's misconduct, and the existence of aggravating or mitigating factors." In re Discipline of Lerner, 124 Nev. 1232, 1246 , 197 P.3d 1067, 1077 (2008).

2016SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A 41(2 '41E:2119 In determining the appropriate discipline, this court has considered four factors to be weighed: "the duty violated, the lawyer's mental state, the potential or actual injury caused by the lawyer's misconduct, and the existence of aggravating or mitigating factors." In re Discipline of Lerner, 124 Nev. 1232, 1246 , 197 P.3d 1067, 1077 (2008).

1313

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nevada. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Where else courts name it

NV 13 (2015–2016) IL 2 (2006–2006)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check