Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
13 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 1978–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Telthorster v. Tennellgreen2 sentences2005Telthorster v. Tennel , 92 S.W.3d 457, 461 (Tex. 2002); Kassen v. Hatley , 887 S.W.2d 4, 9 (Tex. 1994). 2005Telthorster v. Tennell, 92 S.W.3d 457, 461 (Tex.2002); Kassen v. Hatley, 887 S.W.2d 4, 9 (Tex.1994). | 2 | 3 |
Kassen v. Hatleygreen2 sentences2005Telthorster v. Tennel , 92 S.W.3d 457, 461 (Tex. 2002); Kassen v. Hatley , 887 S.W.2d 4, 9 (Tex. 1994). 2005Telthorster v. Tennell, 92 S.W.3d 457, 461 (Tex.2002); Kassen v. Hatley, 887 S.W.2d 4, 9 (Tex.1994). | 2 | 2 |
Newman v. Obersteller Ex Rel. Oberstellergreen2 sentences2005See id. at 624 . 2005See id. at 624 . | 2 | 2 |
Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission v. IT-Davygreen2 sentences2005Conservation Comm’n v. IT-Davy, 74 S.W.3d 849, 858-55 (Tex.2002); Bland Indep. 2005Conservation Comm = n v. IT-Davy , 74 S.W.3d 849 , 853 B 55 (Tex. 2002); Bland Indep. | 1 | 2 |
Southern Crushed Concrete, Llc v. City of Houstongreen1 sentence2018S. Crushed Concrete, LLC v. City of Houston, 398 S.W.3d 676, 678 (Tex. 2013). | 1 | 1 |
Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. Mirandagreen1 sentence2015See Tex. Dep't of Parks & Wildlife v. Miranda, 133 S.W.3d 217, 228 (Tex. 2004). | 1 | 1 |
Schaefer v. City of San Antonio Ex Rel. Water Works Board of Trusteesgreen1 sentence1997GOVERNMENTAL IMMUNITY In his first point of error, Zaeharie claims the Water System is not entitled to summary judgment on the basis of governmental immunity because it is not an agent of the City. 5 It is undisputed that the Waterworks Board of Trustees of San Antonio, the predecessor to the current Water System, was an agent of the city, see Schaefer v. City of San Antonio By and Through Water Works Bd. of Trustees, 838 S.W.2d 688, 691 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1992, no writ); San Antonio Indep. | 1 | 1 |
Steele v. City of Houstongreen1 sentence1997See Steele, 603 S.W.2d at 791 (reversing a summary judgment granted the city on the basis of governmental immunity in plaintiffs suit for damages for the intentional destruction of their home by police officers attempting to recapture three escaped convicts, and holding that plaintiffs had stated a takings claim and were entitled to the opportunity to make proof that the city’s officers, acting with authority or color of authority, set the house on fire and that its subsequent destruction was for a public use). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
City of Lancaster v. Chambers
green
1 sentence2003Telthorster v. Tennell , 45 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 948, 949 , 2002 Tex. LEXIS 97 (June 27, 2002)(citing Chambers , 883 S.W.2d at 653 ) . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Robinson v. Central Texas MHMR Center
neutral
2 sentences1989The court of appeals reversed on the basis of governmental immunity. 758 S.W.2d 394 . 1989The court of appeals reversed on the basis of governmental immunity. 758 S.W.2d 394 . | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Bernhard v. Kerrville Independent School District
neutral
2 sentences1978The court of civil appeals affirmed the holding of the trial court regarding the School District, but reversed the judgment granting the individual defendants' motion for summary judgment and remanded the cause to the trial court for a new trial. 547 S.W.2d 685 . 1978The court of civil appeals affirmed the holding of the trial court regarding the School District, but reversed the judgment granting the individual defendants’ motion for summary judgment and remanded the cause to the trial court for a new trial. 547 S.W.2d 685 . | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.