Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
13 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1991–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Almanza v. Stategreen2 sentences2016Id. (citing Almanza v. State, 686 S.W.2d 157, 171 (Tex.Crira.App.1985)), If the error was preserved properly, reversal is required if there is “some harm” to the defendant. 2014Id. at 350 (citing Almanza v. State, 686 S.W.2d 157, 171 (Tex. Crim. | 7 | 8 |
Middleton v. Stategreen2 sentences2019Id. (citing Middleton v. State, 125 S.W.3d 450, 453 (Tex. Crim. 2015Middleton v. State, 125 S.W.3d 450, 453 (Tex.Crim.App. 2003). | 4 | 4 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ngo v. State
green
2 sentences2016Id. (citing Almanza v. State, 686 S.W.2d 157, 171 (Tex.Crira.App.1985)), If the error was preserved properly, reversal is required if there is “some harm” to the defendant. 2014Id. at 350 (citing Almanza v. State, 686 S.W.2d 157, 171 (Tex. Crim. | 7 | 2012–2016 |
Wooten, Codiem Renoir
green
1 sentence2019Id. (citing Middleton v. State, 125 S.W.3d 450, 453 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Sodipo v. State
green
2 sentences1997In Sodipo v. State, 815 S.W.2d 551 (Tex.Crim.App.1990), the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals held that some cases involving breach of procedural statutes contain no concrete data from which an appellate court can meaningfully gauge the likelihood that the error did or did not contribute to the conviction or punishment of the accused. 1997In Sodipo v. State, 815 S.W.2d 551 (Tex.Crim.App.1990), the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals held that some cases involving breach of procedural statutes contain no concrete data from which an appellate court can meaningfully gauge the likelihood that the error did or did not contribute to the conviction or punishment of the accused. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.