Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
13 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1955–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Matagorda County Appraisal District v. Conquest Exploration Co.green2 sentences1995See, e.g., Collin County Appraisal Dist. v. Northeast Dallas Associates, 855 S.W.2d 843, 848 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1993, no writ) (when an erroneous appraised value was not the result of a clerical error, but from error in judgment and reasoning, it could not be corrected under section 25.25(c)); Matagorda County Appraisal Dist. v. Conquest Exploration Co., 788 S.W.2d 687, 692-93 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1990, no writ) (classification of a taxpayer’s tax liability for greater percent working interest in gas wells was a judicial rather than clerical error). 1993See Matagorda County Appraisal Dist. v. Conquest Exploration Co., 788 S.W.2d 687 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1990, no writ). | 2 | 2 |
Rodriguez v. Stategreen1 sentence2011See Rodriguez v. State , 42 S.W.3d 181, 186-87 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2001, no pet.); Smith v. State , 801 S.W.2d 629, 633 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1991, no pet.). | 1 | 1 |
Smith v. Stategreen1 sentence2011See Rodriguez v. State , 42 S.W.3d 181, 186-87 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2001, no pet.); Smith v. State , 801 S.W.2d 629, 633 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1991, no pet.). | 1 | 1 |
Moore v. Stategreen1 sentence1997Id. at 58-59. | 1 | 1 |
Collin County Appraisal District v. Northeast Dallas Associatesgreen1 sentence1995See, e.g., Collin County Appraisal Dist. v. Northeast Dallas Associates, 855 S.W.2d 843, 848 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1993, no writ) (when an erroneous appraised value was not the result of a clerical error, but from error in judgment and reasoning, it could not be corrected under section 25.25(c)); Matagorda County Appraisal Dist. v. Conquest Exploration Co., 788 S.W.2d 687, 692-93 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1990, no writ) (classification of a taxpayer’s tax liability for greater percent working interest in gas wells was a judicial rather than clerical error). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Awadelkariem v. State
green
2 sentences2013But because the trial court rescinded its order granting a new trial more than seventy-five days after placing Cross on community supervision, the trial court did not have the power to do so. [4] See Awadelkariem , 974 S.W.2d at 728 ; Stepan , 244 S.W.3d at 643–46; see also Tex. R. 2013But because the trial court rescinded its order granting a new trial more than seventy-five days after placing Cross on community supervision, the trial court did not have the power to do so.4 See Awadelkariem, 974 S.W.2d at 728 ; Stepan, 244 S.W.3d at 643–46; see also Tex. R. | 2 | 2013–2013 |
Stepan v. State
green
2 sentences2013But because the trial court rescinded its order granting a new trial more than seventy-five days after placing Cross on community supervision, the trial court did not have the power to do so. [4] See Awadelkariem , 974 S.W.2d at 728 ; Stepan , 244 S.W.3d at 643–46; see also Tex. R. 2013But because the trial court rescinded its order granting a new trial more than seventy-five days after placing Cross on community supervision, the trial court did not have the power to do so.4 See Awadelkariem, 974 S.W.2d at 728 ; Stepan, 244 S.W.3d at 643–46; see also Tex. R. | 2 | 2013–2013 |
Arizona v. Evans
green
2 sentences1999Id. at 14-16 , 115 S.Ct. 1185 . 1999Id. at 14-16 , 115 S.Ct. 1185 . | 2 | 1999–1999 |
Henery v. State
green
1 sentence2012Id. at 919 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Comdisco, Inc. v. Tarrant County Appraisal District & Appraisal Review Board of Tarrant County
green
1 sentence2004Id. at 327-28 . | 1 | 2004–2004 |
McLendon v. McLendon
green
1 sentence1998McLendon v. McLendon, 847 S.W.2d at 610 . | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Ex Parte Esquivel
green
1 sentence1987The instant case is much like Ex parte Esquivel, 531 S.W.2d 339 (Tex.Cr.App.1976), where, as a result of a clerical error on the part of a district clerk’s office, the Department of Corrections was never notified that the defendant had been sentenced to life imprisonment in one case. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Ex parte Jones
neutral
2 sentences1955"And in such event the irregularities would not effect the validity of the convictions." See also Ex parte Jones, Tex.Cr.App., 230 S.W.2d 809 ; Ex parte Kemp, 154 Tex. Cr.R. 633, 230 S.W.2d 232 . 1955“And in such event the irregularities would not affect the validity of the convictions.” See also Ex Parte Jones, 230 S.W. 2d 809 ; Ex parte Kemp, 154 Texas Cr. | 1 | 1955–1955 |
Ex Parte Kemp
neutral
1 sentence1955"And in such event the irregularities would not effect the validity of the convictions." See also Ex parte Jones, Tex.Cr.App., 230 S.W.2d 809 ; Ex parte Kemp, 154 Tex. Cr.R. 633, 230 S.W.2d 232 . | 1 | 1955–1955 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.