Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
13 Texas opinions name it 4 courts 1933–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State Farm Lloyds v. Nicolaugreen2 sentences2007See State Farm Lloyds v. Nicolau , 951 S.W.2d 444, 451 (Tex. 1997). 2007See State Farm Lloyds v. Nicolau, 951 S.W.2d 444, 451 (Tex.1997). | 3 | 3 |
Harris County v. Demnygreen2 sentences2007See Denny , 886 S.W.2d at 333 . 2007See Demny, 886 S.W.2d at 333 . | 2 | 2 |
Williams v. Stategreen1 sentence2026See, e.g., Smith v. State, No. 01-13-00438-CR, 2014 WL 4219556 , at *3 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Aug. 26, 2014, pet. ref’d) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (trial court’s refusal to allow defendant’s offer of proof on excluded testimony was harmless because it was “apparent from the record what appellant was attempting to establish by introducing [the evidence]”); Williams v. State, 964 S.W.2d 747, 753 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, pet. ref’d) (same). | 1 | 1 |
Kipp v. Stategreen1 sentence2026See Kipp v. State, 876 S.W.2d 330, 333 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Rozsa v. Jenkinsongreen1 sentence2015See Rozsa v. Jenkinson, 754 S.W.2d 507, 509 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1988, no writ) (holding that notice sent to wrong address was not sufficient under Rule 166a). -3- 04-14-00612-CV OTHER ISSUES Edwards raises other issues that we briefly address. | 1 | 1 |
Subaru of America, Inc. v. David McDavid Nissan, Inc.green1 sentence2003See Subaru of Am., Inc. v. David McDavid Nissan, Inc. , 84 S.W.3d 212, 221 ( Tex. 2002). | 1 | 1 |
Westheimer Independent School District v. Brockettegreen2 sentences2003Dist. v. Brockette, 567 S.W.2d 780, 785 (Tex.1978); Woodruff, 956 S.W.2d at 616 (relying in part on Brochette, 567 S.W.2d at 785 ); cf. Sheppard v. Thomas, No. 01-01-00822-CV, 2003 WL 203474 , at *4 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] Jan. 30, 2003, no pet. h) (noting that “a sheriff can challenge a civil service commission’s ruling in district court on the basis that the commission’s actions were ultra vires”). 4 Thus, we must decide whether the examiner would exceed his statutory authority if he determined he has jurisdiction to review Williams’s suspension. 2003Dist. v. Brockette, 567 S.W.2d 780, 785 (Tex.1978); Woodruff, 956 S.W.2d at 616 (relying in part on Brochette, 567 S.W.2d at 785 ); cf. Sheppard v. Thomas, No. 01-01-00822-CV, 2003 WL 203474 , at *4 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] Jan. 30, 2003, no pet. h) (noting that “a sheriff can challenge a civil service commission’s ruling in district court on the basis that the commission’s actions were ultra vires”). 4 Thus, we must decide whether the examiner would exceed his statutory authority if he determined he has jurisdiction to review Williams’s suspension. | 1 | 1 |
Nuchia v. Woodruffgreen1 sentence2003Dist. v. Brockette, 567 S.W.2d 780, 785 (Tex.1978); Woodruff, 956 S.W.2d at 616 (relying in part on Brochette, 567 S.W.2d at 785 ); cf. Sheppard v. Thomas, No. 01-01-00822-CV, 2003 WL 203474 , at *4 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] Jan. 30, 2003, no pet. h) (noting that “a sheriff can challenge a civil service commission’s ruling in district court on the basis that the commission’s actions were ultra vires”). 4 Thus, we must decide whether the examiner would exceed his statutory authority if he determined he has jurisdiction to review Williams’s suspension. | 1 | 1 |
Nueces County v. Nueces County Civil Service Commissiongreen1 sentence2003Comm’n, 909 S.W.2d 597, 598 (Tex.App.Corpus Christi 1995, no pet.) (stating courts can intervene in administrative proceedings when agency is exercising authority beyond its statutorily conferred powers) (quoting Westheimer Indep. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Henry S. Miller Company v. Evans
green
1 sentence2018Id. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Whitaker v. Bank of El Paso
green
1 sentence2003Id. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Hahn v. State
green
2 sentences1983See: Hahn v. State, 73 Tex.Cr.R. 409 , 165 S.W. 218 (1914); Siars v. State, 63 Tex.Cr.R. 567 , 140 S.W. 777 (1911); Allen v. State, 536 S.W.2d 364 (Tex.Cr.App.1976). 1983See: Hahn v. State, 73 Tex.Cr.R. 409 , 165 S.W. 218 (1914); Siars v. State, 63 Tex.Cr.R. 567 , 140 S.W. 777 (1911); Allen v. State, 536 S.W.2d 364 (Tex.Cr.App.1976). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Allen v. State
green
1 sentence1983See: Hahn v. State, 73 Tex.Cr.R. 409 , 165 S.W. 218 (1914); Siars v. State, 63 Tex.Cr.R. 567 , 140 S.W. 777 (1911); Allen v. State, 536 S.W.2d 364 (Tex.Cr.App.1976). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Siars v. State
neutral
2 sentences1983See: Hahn v. State, 73 Tex.Cr.R. 409 , 165 S.W. 218 (1914); Siars v. State, 63 Tex.Cr.R. 567 , 140 S.W. 777 (1911); Allen v. State, 536 S.W.2d 364 (Tex.Cr.App.1976). 1983See: Hahn v. State, 73 Tex.Cr.R. 409 , 165 S.W. 218 (1914); Siars v. State, 63 Tex.Cr.R. 567 , 140 S.W. 777 (1911); Allen v. State, 536 S.W.2d 364 (Tex.Cr.App.1976). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Evans v. Pringle
green
1 sentence1982The Court of Appeals affirmed. 634 S.W.2d 774 . | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Pena v. State
neutral
2 sentences1933The following cases have some bearing on the point under consideration: Pena v. State, 111 Tex. Crim. 218 , 12 S.W.2d 1015 ; Hawley v. State, 107 Tex. Crim. 243 , 296 S.W. 556 ; Nuben v. State, 21 S.W.2d 1061 ; Bell v. State, 47 S.W.2d 839 . 1933The following cases have some bearing on the point under consideration: Pena v. State, 111 Tex. Crim. 218 , 12 S.W.2d 1015 ; Hawley v. State, 107 Tex. Crim. 243 , 296 S.W. 556 ; Nuben v. State, 21 S.W.2d 1061 ; Bell v. State, 47 S.W.2d 839 . | 1 | 1933–1933 |
Hawley v. State
green
2 sentences1933The following cases have some bearing on the point under consideration: Pena v. State, 111 Tex. Crim. 218 , 12 S.W.2d 1015 ; Hawley v. State, 107 Tex. Crim. 243 , 296 S.W. 556 ; Nuben v. State, 21 S.W.2d 1061 ; Bell v. State, 47 S.W.2d 839 . 1933The following cases have some bearing on the point under consideration: Pena v. State, 111 Tex. Crim. 218 , 12 S.W.2d 1015 ; Hawley v. State, 107 Tex. Crim. 243 , 296 S.W. 556 ; Nuben v. State, 21 S.W.2d 1061 ; Bell v. State, 47 S.W.2d 839 . | 1 | 1933–1933 |
Nations v. State
neutral
1 sentence1933The following cases have some bearing on the point under consideration: Pena v. State, 111 Tex. Crim. 218 , 12 S.W.2d 1015 ; Hawley v. State, 107 Tex. Crim. 243 , 296 S.W. 556 ; Nuben v. State, 21 S.W.2d 1061 ; Bell v. State, 47 S.W.2d 839 . | 1 | 1933–1933 |
Bell v. State
neutral
1 sentence1933The following cases have some bearing on the point under consideration: Pena v. State, 111 Tex. Crim. 218 , 12 S.W.2d 1015 ; Hawley v. State, 107 Tex. Crim. 243 , 296 S.W. 556 ; Nuben v. State, 21 S.W.2d 1061 ; Bell v. State, 47 S.W.2d 839 . | 1 | 1933–1933 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.