Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
13 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2009–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Brock Specialty Services, Ltd.green2 sentences2021See In re Brock Specialty Servs., 286 S.W.3d 649, 653 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi– Edinburg 2009, orig. proceeding) (“The FAA may govern a written arbitration clause enforced in Texas state court if the parties have expressly contracted for the FAA’s application. . . . 2018“The FAA may govern a written arbitration clause enforced in Texas state court if the parties have expressly contracted for the FAA’s application.” In re Brock Specialty Servs., Ltd., 286 S.W.3d 649, 653 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2009, orig. proceeding) (citing In re AdvancePCS Health, 172 S.W.3d at 605–606 & n.3). | 2 | 2 |
In Re AdvancePCS Health L.P.green2 sentences2018“The FAA may govern a written arbitration clause enforced in Texas state court if the parties have expressly contracted for the FAA’s application.” In re Brock Specialty Servs., Ltd., 286 S.W.3d 649, 653 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2009, orig. proceeding) (citing In re AdvancePCS Health, 172 S.W.3d at 605–606 & n.3). 2013See In re Advance PCS Health, L.P., 172 S.W.3d 603 , 605–06 & n.3 (Tex. 2005) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam) (FAA may govern a written arbitration clause enforced in Texas court if parties have expressly contracted for FAA’s application); In re ReadyOne Indus., Inc., 294 S.W.3d 764, 769 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2009, orig. proceeding) (if parties expressly choose for arbitration agreement to be governed by FAA, agreement should be enforced regardless of parties’ nexus to interstate commerce). | 1 | 11 |
Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. v. Dyna Torque Technologies, Inc.green1 sentence2017Grp., Inc., 303 S.W.3d 386, 396 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2010, orig. proceeding) (“The FAA governs a written arbitration clause in any contract involving commerce or evidencing a maritime transaction.”). 2 Analysis Trafigura contends that the trial court erred by denying its motion to compel arbitration for three reasons. | 1 | 1 |
In Re Readyone Industries, Inc.green1 sentence2013See In re Advance PCS Health, L.P., 172 S.W.3d 603 , 605–06 & n.3 (Tex. 2005) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam) (FAA may govern a written arbitration clause enforced in Texas court if parties have expressly contracted for FAA’s application); In re ReadyOne Indus., Inc., 294 S.W.3d 764, 769 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2009, orig. proceeding) (if parties expressly choose for arbitration agreement to be governed by FAA, agreement should be enforced regardless of parties’ nexus to interstate commerce). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.