Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
13 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1999–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Riley v. Cal. United Statesgreen2 sentences2019Id. at 579-80, 587. 2019Id. at 579-80, 587. | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Riley
green
2 sentences2013Id. at 910 . 2010Id. at 910 . | 4 | 1999–2013 |
In re the Personal Restraint of Stockwell
green
2 sentences2018In Stockwell, we held that misadvice that the maximum sentence was lower than it really was (20 years rather than life) could not, logically, have coerced Stockwell's guilty plea—^because the misadvice about a lower sentence than statutorily allowed could not have scared Stockwell into pleading guilty more than correct advice about a longer possible sentencing consequence would have. 179 Wn.2d at 603 . 2018In Stockwell, we held that misadvice that the maximum sentence was lower than it really was (20 years rather than life) could not, logically, have coerced Stockwell's guilty plea—^because the misadvice about a lower sentence than statutorily allowed could not have scared Stockwell into pleading guilty more than correct advice about a longer possible sentencing consequence would have. 179 Wn.2d at 603 . | 2 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Riley
green
2 sentences2010Id. at 910, 976 P.2d 624 . 2000The court noted that in general where there is credible evidence from which a jury could reasonably determine that the defendant provoked the need to act in self-defense, an aggressor instruction is appropriate. 137 Wash.2d at 909-910 , 976 P.2d 624 . | 2 | 2000–2010 |
Snyder v. Medical Service Corp.
green
1 sentence2025Snyder Does Not Bar Claim as a Matter of Law The City argues Snyder v. Medical Service Corp. of Eastern Washington, 145 Wn.2d 233 , 35 P.3d 1158 (2001), bars Riley’s claim because his requested accommodation was new coworkers. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Snyder v. Medical Service Corp.
green
1 sentence2025Snyder Does Not Bar Claim as a Matter of Law The City argues Snyder v. Medical Service Corp. of Eastern Washington, 145 Wn.2d 233 , 35 P.3d 1158 (2001), bars Riley’s claim because his requested accommodation was new coworkers. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Grott
green
2 sentences2024The court in State v. Grott applied the Riley standard. 195 Wn.2d 256 , 458 P.3d 750 (2020). 2024The court in State v. Grott applied the Riley standard. 195 Wn.2d 256 , 458 P.3d 750 (2020). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
LK Operating, LLC v. Collection Group, LLC
green
1 sentence2016LK Operating, LLC v. Collection Grp., LLC, 181 Wn.2d 117, 126 , 330P.3d 190(2014). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Magaña v. Hyundai Motor America
green
1 sentence2016Magana. 167 Wn.2d at 584 (citing CR 26(b)(1)). 1 For the first time on appeal, Benz and Riley claim the CR 11 judgment was duplicative of two judgments entered on January 2, 2015 against Skykomish Hotel LLC and Skykomish was unjustly enriched because it "accepted" sale of the Hotel as "satisfaction of all judgments." We do not consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Molski v. Evergreen Dynasty Corp.
green
1 sentence2016App. at 694 . 11 No. 72735-4-1 (Consol. with No. 73030-4-l)/12 Benz and Riley rely on Molski v. Evergreen Dynasty Corp.. 500 F.3d 1047 (9th Cir. 2007), to argue that compared to the number of pleadings filed in Molski. the court erred in finding they are vexatious litigants. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Yurtis v. Phipps
green
1 sentence2016Benz and Riley claim the "minimal filings made by Benz and Riley personally" do not support finding they are vexatious litigants.3 Benz and Riley cite no authority to support the argument that the court should not have considered the pleadings they filed on behalf of their limited liability companies, nor do they identify the findings they believe the court made based on pleadings filed on behalf of their companies. 3 Benz and Riley also argue the order violates the First Amendment by limiting their right to "petition the government for a redress of grievances." We disagree. "[A]n individual d | 1 | 2016–2016 |
State v. Arthur
green
2 sentences1999The theories of the case can be sufficiently argued and understood by the jury without such instruction." State v. Arthur, 42 Wash.App. 120 , 125 n. 1, 708 P.2d 1230 (1985). 1999The theories of the case can be sufficiently argued and understood by the jury without such instruction." State v. Arthur, 42 Wash.App. 120 , 125 n. 1, 708 P.2d 1230 (1985). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.