special relationship exception (West Virginia) · Go Syfert
← West Virginia issues

special relationship exception in West Virginia

13 West Virginia opinions name it 1 courts 1989–2024 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by West Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
Walker v. Meadowsgreen
wva · 1999 · cited in 3 West Virginia opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
2 sentences

2014Special Relationship Exception to the Public Duty Doctrine The final issue I wish to address involves the majority opinion’s terse treatment of the special relationship exception to the public duty doctrine.3 We have held that, under the public duty doctrine, “a local governmental entity’s liability for nondiscretionary . . . functions may not be predicated upon the breach of a general duty owed to the public as a whole.” Walker v. Meadows, 206 W.

2014Special Relationship Exception to the Public Duty Doctrine The final issue I wish to address involves the majority opinion’s terse treatment of the special relationship exception to the public duty doctrine. 5 We have held that, under the public duty doctrine, “a local governmental entity’s liability for nondiscretionary ... functions may not be predicated upon the breach of a general duty owed to the public as a whole.” Walker v. Meadows, 206 W.Va. 78, 83 , 521 S.E.2d 801, 806 (1999) (internal quotations and citation omitted).

33
Randall v. Fairmont City Police Departmentgreen
wva · 1991 · cited in 3 West Virginia opinions naming this issue, 1997–2022
2 sentences

1997Va. Code, 29-12A-5(a)(5) [1986] of the Governmental Tort Claims and Insurance Reform Act incorporates the special relationship exception because the Act is coextensive with the common law public duty doctrine, we were guided by “the general rule of construction in governmental tort legislation cases favoring liability, not immunity: unless the legislature has clearly provided for immunity under the circumstances, the general common-law goal of compensating injured parties for damages caused by negligent acts must prevail.” Randall, 186 W.Va. at 347 , 412 S.E.2d at 748 (citations omitted).

1997Va. Code, 29-12A-5(a)(5) [1986] of the Governmental Tort Claims and Insurance Reform Act incorporates the special relationship exception because the Act is coextensive with the common law public duty doctrine, we were guided by “the general rule of construction in governmental tort legislation cases favoring liability, not immunity: unless the legislature has clearly provided for immunity under the circumstances, the general common-law goal of compensating injured parties for damages caused by negligent acts must prevail.” Randall, 186 W.Va. at 347 , 412 S.E.2d at 748 (citations omitted).

13
Holsten v. Masseygreen
wva · 1997 · cited in 2 West Virginia opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
2 sentences

2014Specifically, the majority opinion states that the record does not show that the Regional Jail “assert[ed] the public duty doctrine as a defense to liability, to which respondent could then properly invoke the special duty exception.” This erroneous limitation on the invocation of the special relationship exception was compounded by the majority opinion’s unsupported assertion that the special relationship exception is not “a stand-alone basis of liability.”5 Our prior cases have clearly held that the special relationship “exception gives rise to a cause of action in certain situations when th

2014Specifically, the majority opinion states that the record does not show that the Regional Jail “assert[ed] the public duty doctrine as a defense to liability, to which respondent could then properly invoke the special duty exception.” This erroneous limitation on the invocation of the special relationship exception was compounded by the majority opinion’s unsupported assertion that the special relationship exception is not “a stand-alone basis of liability.” 7 Our prior eases have clearly held that the special relationship “exception gives rise to a cause of action in certain situations when t

12
Barbina v. Currygreen
wva · 2007 · cited in 1 West Virginia opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
2 sentences

2015Direct contact, “[a]s a general rule . . . contemplates actual contact between a government entity and an injured party.” Barbina v. Curry, 221 W.Va. 41, 49 , 650 S.E.2d 140, 148 (2007).

2015Direct contact, “[a]s a general rule . . . contemplates actual contact between a government entity and an injured party.” Barbina v. Curry, 221 W.Va. 41, 49 , 650 S.E.2d 140, 148 (2007).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in West Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (12)

CaseCitedYears
Wolfe v. City of Wheeling green
wva · 1989
2 sentences

2018In syllabus point seven of Randall, this Court explained the special relationship principle as follows: “To establish that a special relationship exists between a local governmental entity and an individual, which is the basis for a special duty of care owed to such individual, the following elements must be shown: (1) an assumption by the local governmental entity, through promises or actions, of an affirmative duty to act on behalf of the party who was injured; (2) knowledge on the part of the local governmental entity’s agents that inaction could lead to harm; (3) some form of direct contac

2018In syllabus point seven of Randall, this Court explained the special relationship principle as follows: “To establish that a special relationship exists between a local governmental entity and an individual, which is the basis for a special duty of care owed to such individual, the following elements must be shown: (1) an assumption by the local governmental entity, through promises or actions, of an affirmative duty to act on behalf of the party who was injured; (2) knowledge on the part of the local governmental entity’s agents that inaction could lead to harm; (3) some form of direct contac

42007–2018
Benson v. Kutsch green
wva · 1989
2 sentences

2014Va. 1 , 380 S.E.2d 36 (1989), that “[i]f a special relationship exists between a local governmental entity and an individual which gives rise to a duty to such individual, and the duty is breached causing injuries, then a suit may be maintained against such entity.” The decision in J.H., discussed supra, illustrates the application of the special relationship exception.

2014This Court held in syllabus point 3 of Benson v. Kutsch, 181 W.Va. 1 , 380 S.E.2d 36 (1989), that “[i]f a special relationship exists between a local governmental entity and an individual which gives rise to a duty to such individual, and the duty is breached causing injuries, then a suit may be maintained against such entity.” The decision in J.H., discussed supra, illustrates the application of the special relationship exception.

42007–2014
Parkulo v. West Virginia Board of Probation & Parole green
wva · 1997
2 sentences

2007Summary Judgment for DHHR Mr. Barbina contends that DHHR had a duty to protect A.B. under the special relationship doctrine and that harm resulted from the breach of the duty imposed by the doctrine. 14 We disagree. 15 This Court set out the elements of the special relationship doctrine involving a state governmental entity in Syllabus point 12 of Parkulo v. West Virginia Board of Probation and Parole, 199 W.Va. 161 , 483 S.E.2d 507 (1996), as follows: The four requirements for the application of the “special relationship” exception to W.

2007Summary Judgment for DHHR Mr. Barbina contends that DHHR had a duty to protect A.B. under the special relationship doctrine and that harm resulted from the breach of the duty imposed by the doctrine. 14 We disagree. 15 This Court set out the elements of the special relationship doctrine involving a state governmental entity in Syllabus point 12 of Parkulo v. West Virginia Board of Probation and Parole, 199 W.Va. 161 , 483 S.E.2d 507 (1996), as follows: The four requirements for the application of the “special relationship” exception to W.

22007–2014
Beckley v. Crabtree green
wva · 1993
2 sentences

2024The parties do not address West Virginia Code § 29-12A-5(a)(5)’s codification of the public duty doctrine or the special relationship exception to that general rule. 22 The Beckley Court concluded that a county commission was not immune from a claim resulting from its sheriff negligently shooting a state trooper by discharging a shotgun while placing it in the trunk of a car after completing an arrest. 189 W.

2024Va. 94 , 428 S.E.2d 317 .

12024–2024
Dreama Bowden, Administratrix v. Monroe County Commission green
wva · 2013
1 sentence

2024Va. Code § 29 -12A-5(a)(5)); Bowden, 232 W.

12024–2024
W. Va. State Police, Corporal R.D. Eshbaugh v. Victoria Hughes, Administratrix green
wva · 2017
1 sentence

2022Va. at 412 , 796 S.E.2d at 199 , and the special relationship exception is incorporated into West Virginia Code § 29-12A-5(a)(5).

12022–2022
Lorraine M. Upchurch v. McDowell County 911 and Jane Doe Dispatcher neutral
wva · 2013
2 sentences

2018We examined the special relationship exception and ultimately found that the plaintiff had “failed to prove the existence of a special relationship between McDowell County 911 and [the plaintiff] such as would form the basis of a special duty of care to him.” Id. at 96 , 750 S.E.2d at 649 ; see also Miller v. Elkins-Randolph Cty.

2018We examined the special relationship exception and ultimately found that the plaintiff had “failed to prove the existence of a special relationship between McDowell County 911 and [the plaintiff] such as would form the basis of a special duty of care to him.” Id. at 96 , 750 S.E.2d at 649 ; see also Miller v. Elkins-Randolph Cty.

12018–2018
Moats v. Preston County Commission green
wva · 1999
1 sentence

2014Comm’n., 206 W.

12014–2014
McCoy v. Cohen green
wva · 1965
2 sentences

2007“A fundamental legal principle is that negligence to be actionable must be the proximate cause of the injury complained of[.]” Syl. pt. 2, McCoy v. Cohen, 149 W.Va. 197 , 140 S.E.2d 427 (1965).

2007“A fundamental legal principle is that negligence to be actionable must be the proximate cause of the injury complained of[.]” Syl. pt. 2, McCoy v. Cohen, 149 W.Va. 197 , 140 S.E.2d 427 (1965).

12007–2007
O'DELL v. Town of Gauley Bridge green
wva · 1992
2 sentences

1999Code § 29-12A-5(a)(9) dealing with loss or claims resulting from licensing powers is not subject to the special relationship exception); O’Dell v. Town of Gauley Bridge, 188 W.Va. 596 , 425 S.E.2d 551 (1992) (holding that the special relationship exception does not apply to W.Va.Code § 29-12A-5(a)(ll)).

1999Code § 29-12A-5(a)(9) dealing with loss or claims resulting from licensing powers is not subject to the special relationship exception); O’Dell v. Town of Gauley Bridge, 188 W.Va. 596 , 425 S.E.2d 551 (1992) (holding that the special relationship exception does not apply to W.Va.Code § 29-12A-5(a)(ll)).

11999–1999
Cuffy v. City of New York green
ny · 1987
2 sentences

1999The New York courts have extensively explored the special relationship exception and concluded as follows in Cuffy v. City of New York, 69 N.Y.2d 255 , 513 N.Y.S.2d 372 , 505 N.E.2d 937 (1987): Indeed, at the heart of most of these “special duty” cases is the unfairness that the courts have perceived in precluding recovery when a municipality’s voluntary undertaking has lulled the injured party into a false sense of security and has thereby induced him either to relax his own vigilance or to forego other available avenues of protection.

1999The New York courts have extensively explored the special relationship exception and concluded as follows in Cuffy v. City of New York, 69 N.Y.2d 255 , 513 N.Y.S.2d 372 , 505 N.E.2d 937 (1987): Indeed, at the heart of most of these “special duty” cases is the unfairness that the courts have perceived in precluding recovery when a municipality’s voluntary undertaking has lulled the injured party into a false sense of security and has thereby induced him either to relax his own vigilance or to forego other available avenues of protection.

11999–1999
Leake v. Cain green
colo · 1986
1 sentence

1989The court appears to have followed the special relationship rule discussed in Part II, infra: “Where a person should reasonably foresee that his act, or failure to act, will involve an unreasonable risk of harm to another, there is a duty to avoid such harm.” 720 P.2d at 160 .

11989–1989

Statutes the citing opinions construe

WV § W. Va. Code § 29-12A-5 (8) WV § W. Va. Code § 29-12A-1 (5) USC § 42u.s.c.1983 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

WA 64 (1986–2026) CA 55 (1977–2026) NY 49 (1993–2025) IL 23 (1990–2018) MD 18 (1974–2025) WV 13 (1989–2024) FL 13 (1985–2022) UT 12 (1993–2025) CT 11 (1994–2015) MI 11 (1996–2021) OH 11 (2006–2025) KS 10 (1983–2009) PA 10 (1985–2026) NC 9 (1996–2018) NM 8 (1999–2024) NJ 8 (1984–2025) KY 8 (2001–2025) DC 8 (1992–2025) GA 7 (2008–2026) CO 6 (1997–2026) ID 6 (2005–2024) TX 6 (1992–2006) MA 5 (1993–2008) OR 4 (1986–2009) MO 4 (2000–2022) TN 4 (2005–2016) MN 3 (1993–2011) SD 3 (2002–2021) WY 3 (1988–2018) VA 3 (1991–2025) NH 2 (1997–2007) IA 2 (1990–2020) AZ 2 (1997–2022) IN 2 (2013–2013) MT 2 (2000–2013)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check