Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1992–2006 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Johnson v. Standard Fruit and Vegetable Co., Inc.green2 sentences2005Lions Eye Bank of Tex. v. Perry, 56 S.W.3d 872, 877 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2001, pet. denied) (citing Johnson v. Standard Fruit & Vegetable Co., 984 S.W.2d 633, 638 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1997), rev’d on other grounds, 985 S.W.2d 62 (Tex.1998)). 2005Lions Eye Bank of Tex. v. Perry , 56 S.W.3d 872, 877 (Tex. App. C Houston [14th Dist.] 2001, pet. denied) (citing Johnson v. Standard Fruit & Vegetable Co. , 984 S.W.2d 633, 638 (Tex. App. C Houston [1st Dist.] 1997), rev = d on other grounds , 985 S.W.2d 62 (Tex. 1998)). | 2 | 2 |
Lions Eye Bank of Texas v. Perrygreen2 sentences2005Lions Eye Bank of Tex. v. Perry, 56 S.W.3d 872, 877 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2001, pet. denied) (citing Johnson v. Standard Fruit & Vegetable Co., 984 S.W.2d 633, 638 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1997), rev’d on other grounds, 985 S.W.2d 62 (Tex.1998)). 2005Lions Eye Bank, 56 S.W.3d at 877 (finding plaintiffs were precluded from establishing the defendant owed them a duty not to negligently inflict mental anguish because there was no contractual relationship). | 2 | 2 |
Continental Southern Lines, Inc. v. Hillandgreen1 sentence1992See , e.g. , Continental S. Lines, Inc. v. Hilland , 528 S.W.2d 828 (Tex. 1975) (suing corporation under assumed name did not preclude plaintiff from opportunity to prove corporation was not misled as to mistake); Gentry v. Credit Plan Corp. , 528 S.W.2d 571 (Tex. 1975) (suing subsidiary will toll limitation against parent if alter ego is proven); O'Quinn v. Scott , 251 S.W.2d 168 (Tex. Civ. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Standard Fruit & Vegetable Co. v. Johnson
green
2 sentences2005Lions Eye Bank of Tex. v. Perry, 56 S.W.3d 872, 877 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2001, pet. denied) (citing Johnson v. Standard Fruit & Vegetable Co., 984 S.W.2d 633, 638 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1997), rev’d on other grounds, 985 S.W.2d 62 (Tex.1998)). 2005Lions Eye Bank of Tex. v. Perry , 56 S.W.3d 872, 877 (Tex. App. C Houston [14th Dist.] 2001, pet. denied) (citing Johnson v. Standard Fruit & Vegetable Co. , 984 S.W.2d 633, 638 (Tex. App. C Houston [1st Dist.] 1997), rev = d on other grounds , 985 S.W.2d 62 (Tex. 1998)). | 2 | 2005–2005 |
cluster 6555
green
1 sentence2006“The special relationship doctrine is properly invoked in cases involving harms inflicted by third parties, and it is not applicable when it is the conduct of a state actor that has allegedly infringed a person’s constitutional rights.” Leffall, 28 F.3d at 529 (citing Taylor Indep. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Doe v. Boys Clubs of Greater Dallas, Inc.
green
1 sentence2006Doe, 868 S.W.2d at 950 . | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Dieter v. Baker Service Tools, a Division of Baker International, Inc.
green
1 sentence1994Dieter v. Baker Service Tools, 739 S.W.2d 405 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1987, writ denied). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Gentry v. Credit Plan Corporation of Houston
green
1 sentence1992See , e.g. , Continental S. Lines, Inc. v. Hilland , 528 S.W.2d 828 (Tex. 1975) (suing corporation under assumed name did not preclude plaintiff from opportunity to prove corporation was not misled as to mistake); Gentry v. Credit Plan Corp. , 528 S.W.2d 571 (Tex. 1975) (suing subsidiary will toll limitation against parent if alter ego is proven); O'Quinn v. Scott , 251 S.W.2d 168 (Tex. Civ. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
O'QUINN v. Scott
green
1 sentence1992See , e.g. , Continental S. Lines, Inc. v. Hilland , 528 S.W.2d 828 (Tex. 1975) (suing corporation under assumed name did not preclude plaintiff from opportunity to prove corporation was not misled as to mistake); Gentry v. Credit Plan Corp. , 528 S.W.2d 571 (Tex. 1975) (suing subsidiary will toll limitation against parent if alter ego is proven); O'Quinn v. Scott , 251 S.W.2d 168 (Tex. Civ. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.