precise legal analysis in Connecticut

2019Co., 254 Conn. 387, 396 , 757 A.2d 1074 (2000).

2019Co., 254 Conn. 387, 396 , 757 A.2d 1074 (2000).

2014Co., 267 Conn. 592 , 599 n.7, 840 A.2d 1158 (2004).

2014Co., 267 Conn. 592 , 599 n.7, 840 A.2d 1158 (2004).

2025In any event, the plaintiff filed this appeal on Page 8 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL 0, 0 10 ,0 0 Conn. App. 1 Duclos v. Hayes trial court’s noncompliance with this rule of practice does not preclude our consideration of the plaintiff’s claims on the merits because our review is plenary; see part II of this opinion; and the precise legal analysis undertaken by the trial court is not essential to this court’s review of the issues on appeal.11 See DAB Three, LLC v. Fitzpatrick, 215 Conn. App. 835 , 844 n.10, 283 A.3d 1048 (2022) (absence of memorandum of decision or transcript signed by trial court d

2025In any event, the plaintiff filed this appeal on Page 8 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL 0, 0 10 ,0 0 Conn. App. 1 Duclos v. Hayes trial court’s noncompliance with this rule of practice does not preclude our consideration of the plaintiff’s claims on the merits because our review is plenary; see part II of this opinion; and the precise legal analysis undertaken by the trial court is not essential to this court’s review of the issues on appeal.11 See DAB Three, LLC v. Fitzpatrick, 215 Conn. App. 835 , 844 n.10, 283 A.3d 1048 (2022) (absence of memorandum of decision or transcript signed by trial court d

2022Nevertheless, this deficiency does not preclude our consideration of the plaintiff’s claims on appeal because ‘‘the certified transcript provides the basis of the trial court’s decision’’; id.; and our standard of ‘‘review is plenary, and the precise legal analysis undertaken by the trial court is not essential to [this court’s] consideration of the issue on appeal.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Id.

2018Although it would have been preferable for the trial court to provide its legal analysis in its memorandum of decision, "[w]hen the facts underlying a claim on appeal are not in dispute and that claim is subject to de novo review, the precise legal analysis undertaken by the trial court is not essential to the reviewing court's consideration of the issue on appeal." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Donald , 325 Conn. 346 , 354, 157 A.3d 1134 (2017).

2018Although it would have been preferable for the trial court to provide its legal analysis in its memorandum of decision, "[w]hen the facts underlying a claim on appeal are not in dispute and that claim is subject to de novo review, the precise legal analysis undertaken by the trial court is not essential to the reviewing court's consideration of the issue on appeal." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Donald , 325 Conn. 346 , 354, 157 A.3d 1134 (2017).

2017"The general purpose of [the relevant] rules of practice ... [requiring the appellant to provide a sufficient record] is to ensure that there is a trial court record that is adequate for an informed appellate review of **354 the various claims presented by the parties." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Ammirata v. Zoning Board of Appeals , 264 Conn. 737 , 744, 826 A.2d 170 (2003). "[W]hen the facts underlying a claim on appeal are not in dispute and that claim is subject to de novo review, 'the precise legal analysis undertaken by the trial court is not essential to the reviewing court's co

2017"The general purpose of [the relevant] rules of practice ... [requiring the appellant to provide a sufficient record] is to ensure that there is a trial court record that is adequate for an informed appellate review of **354 the various claims presented by the parties." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Ammirata v. Zoning Board of Appeals , 264 Conn. 737 , 744, 826 A.2d 170 (2003). "[W]hen the facts underlying a claim on appeal are not in dispute and that claim is subject to de novo review, 'the precise legal analysis undertaken by the trial court is not essential to the reviewing court's co

2011Furthermore, on claims involving questions of law, the court’s review is plenary, and “the precise legal analysis undertaken by the trial court is not essential to the reviewing court’s consideration of the issue on appeal.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Niehaus v. Cowles Business Media, Inc., 263 Conn. 178, 184 , 819 A.2d 765 (2003).

2011Furthermore, on claims involving questions of law, the court’s review is plenary, and “the precise legal analysis undertaken by the trial court is not essential to the reviewing court’s consideration of the issue on appeal.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Niehaus v. Cowles Business Media, Inc., 263 Conn. 178, 184 , 819 A.2d 765 (2003).

2000In such circumstances, the facts are not in dispute and, because the reviewing court’s review is de novo, the precise legal analysis undertaken by the trial court is not essential to the reviewing court’s consideration of the issue on appeal. 10 Furthermore, the case cited by the trial court, Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co. v. Rand, supra, 16 Conn. L.

2000In such circumstances, the facts are not in dispute and, because the reviewing court’s review is de novo, the precise legal analysis undertaken by the trial court is not essential to the reviewing court’s consideration of the issue on appeal. 10 Furthermore, the case cited by the trial court, Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co. v. Rand, supra, 16 Conn. L.