bill of exceptions alleging error (Georgia) · Go Syfert
← Georgia issues

bill of exceptions alleging error in Georgia

13 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1900–1957 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Rusk v. Hillgreen
ga · 1903 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1918–1918
2 sentences

1918The ruling in Mott v. Brunswick Publishing Co., 117 Ga. 149 ( 43 S. E. 716 ), that where a judgment was rendered at chambers on June 30, 1902, and a bill of exceptions alleging error therein was tendered to the judge on July 30, 1902, this was not within 30 days from the date of the decision (the month of June having but 30 days), was declared, in Rusk v. Hill, 117 Ga. 722, 726, 727 ( 45 S. E. 42 ), to be erroneous, since, in computing the number of days included by this period!, only the first or last day could be counted, and not both the first and the last.

1918The ruling in Mott v. Brunswick Publishing Co., 117 Ga. 149 ( 43 S. E. 716 ), that where a judgment was rendered at chambers on June 30, 1902, and a bill of exceptions alleging error therein was tendered to the judge on July 30, 1902, this was not within 30 days from the date of the decision (the month of June having but 30 days), was declared, in Rusk v. Hill, 117 Ga. 722, 726, 727 ( 45 S. E. 42 ), to be erroneous, since, in computing the number of days included by this period!, only the first or last day could be counted, and not both the first and the last.

11
Cranston v. Bank of the State of Georgiagreen
ga · 1896 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1901–1901
1 sentence

1901See 97 Ga. 406 .

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (16)

CaseCitedYears
First National Bank v. Taylor neutral
ga · 1912
2 sentences

1928“The law embodied in the Civil Code [1910], § 0152, does not in any case authorize delay in tendering to a trial judge a bill of exceptions alleging error in a judgment rendered during a given term, for more than thirty days after the final adjournment of the court for that term.” First National Bank of Forsyth v. Taylor, 138 Ga. 119 (1) ( 74 S. E. 783 ), and citations. 2.

1928“The law embodied in the Civil Code [1910], § 0152, does not in any case authorize delay in tendering to a trial judge a bill of exceptions alleging error in a judgment rendered during a given term, for more than thirty days after the final adjournment of the court for that term.” First National Bank of Forsyth v. Taylor, 138 Ga. 119 (1) ( 74 S. E. 783 ), and citations. 2.

51915–1928
Dietz v. Fahy green
ga · 1899
2 sentences

1928Forsyth v. Freer, 64 Ga. 281 ; Huff v. Brantley, 66 Ga. 599 ; Diets v. Fahy, 107 Ga. 325 ( 33 S. E. 51 ) ; Carter v. Johnson, 112 Ga. 494 (2) ( 37 S. E. 736 ) ; Heery v. Burkhalter, 113 Ga. 1043 ( 39 S. E. 406 ) ; Crawford v. Goodwin, 128 Ga. 134 (2) ( 57 S. E. 240 ) ; Brandon v. Akers, 134 Ga. 78 (3) ( 67 S. E. 540 ); First National Bank of Forsyth v. Taylor, 138 Ga. 119 ( 74 S. E. 783 ); Cunningham v. Strom, 144 Ga. 324 ( 87 S. E. 20 ) ; Grant v. Southern Bell Tel.

1928Forsyth v. Freer, 64 Ga. 281 ; Huff v. Brantley, 66 Ga. 599 ; Diets v. Fahy, 107 Ga. 325 ( 33 S. E. 51 ) ; Carter v. Johnson, 112 Ga. 494 (2) ( 37 S. E. 736 ) ; Heery v. Burkhalter, 113 Ga. 1043 ( 39 S. E. 406 ) ; Crawford v. Goodwin, 128 Ga. 134 (2) ( 57 S. E. 240 ) ; Brandon v. Akers, 134 Ga. 78 (3) ( 67 S. E. 540 ); First National Bank of Forsyth v. Taylor, 138 Ga. 119 ( 74 S. E. 783 ); Cunningham v. Strom, 144 Ga. 324 ( 87 S. E. 20 ) ; Grant v. Southern Bell Tel.

41907–1928
Crawford v. Goodwin green
ga · 1907
2 sentences

1928Forsyth v. Freer, 64 Ga. 281 ; Huff v. Brantley, 66 Ga. 599 ; Diets v. Fahy, 107 Ga. 325 ( 33 S. E. 51 ) ; Carter v. Johnson, 112 Ga. 494 (2) ( 37 S. E. 736 ) ; Heery v. Burkhalter, 113 Ga. 1043 ( 39 S. E. 406 ) ; Crawford v. Goodwin, 128 Ga. 134 (2) ( 57 S. E. 240 ) ; Brandon v. Akers, 134 Ga. 78 (3) ( 67 S. E. 540 ); First National Bank of Forsyth v. Taylor, 138 Ga. 119 ( 74 S. E. 783 ); Cunningham v. Strom, 144 Ga. 324 ( 87 S. E. 20 ) ; Grant v. Southern Bell Tel.

1928Forsyth v. Freer, 64 Ga. 281 ; Huff v. Brantley, 66 Ga. 599 ; Diets v. Fahy, 107 Ga. 325 ( 33 S. E. 51 ) ; Carter v. Johnson, 112 Ga. 494 (2) ( 37 S. E. 736 ) ; Heery v. Burkhalter, 113 Ga. 1043 ( 39 S. E. 406 ) ; Crawford v. Goodwin, 128 Ga. 134 (2) ( 57 S. E. 240 ) ; Brandon v. Akers, 134 Ga. 78 (3) ( 67 S. E. 540 ); First National Bank of Forsyth v. Taylor, 138 Ga. 119 ( 74 S. E. 783 ); Cunningham v. Strom, 144 Ga. 324 ( 87 S. E. 20 ) ; Grant v. Southern Bell Tel.

41912–1928
Forsyth v. Preer, Illges & Co. neutral
ga · 1879
2 sentences

1928Forsyth v. Freer, 64 Ga. 281 ; Huff v. Brantley, 66 Ga. 599 ; Diets v. Fahy, 107 Ga. 325 ( 33 S. E. 51 ) ; Carter v. Johnson, 112 Ga. 494 (2) ( 37 S. E. 736 ) ; Heery v. Burkhalter, 113 Ga. 1043 ( 39 S. E. 406 ) ; Crawford v. Goodwin, 128 Ga. 134 (2) ( 57 S. E. 240 ) ; Brandon v. Akers, 134 Ga. 78 (3) ( 67 S. E. 540 ); First National Bank of Forsyth v. Taylor, 138 Ga. 119 ( 74 S. E. 783 ); Cunningham v. Strom, 144 Ga. 324 ( 87 S. E. 20 ) ; Grant v. Southern Bell Tel.

1926Forsyth v. Preer, 64 Ga. 281 ; Huff v. Brantley, 66 Ga. 599 ; Dietz v. Fahy, 107 Ga. 325 ( 33 S. E. 51 ) ; Carter v. Johnson, 112 Ga. 494 (2) ( 37 S. E. 736 ); Heery v. Burkhalter, 113 Ga. 1043 ( 39 S. E. 406 ) ; Crawford v. Goodwin, 128 Ga. 134 (2) ( 57 S. E. 240 ) ; Brandon v. Akers, 134 Ga. 78 (3) ( 67 S. E. 540 ).” First National Bank of Forsyth v. Taylor, 138 Ga. 119 ( 74 S. E. 783 ) ; Cunningham v. Strom, 144 Ga. 324 ( 87 S. E. 20 ) ; Grant v. Southern Bell Tel.

31912–1928
Carter v. Johnson green
ga · 1900
2 sentences

1928Forsyth v. Freer, 64 Ga. 281 ; Huff v. Brantley, 66 Ga. 599 ; Diets v. Fahy, 107 Ga. 325 ( 33 S. E. 51 ) ; Carter v. Johnson, 112 Ga. 494 (2) ( 37 S. E. 736 ) ; Heery v. Burkhalter, 113 Ga. 1043 ( 39 S. E. 406 ) ; Crawford v. Goodwin, 128 Ga. 134 (2) ( 57 S. E. 240 ) ; Brandon v. Akers, 134 Ga. 78 (3) ( 67 S. E. 540 ); First National Bank of Forsyth v. Taylor, 138 Ga. 119 ( 74 S. E. 783 ); Cunningham v. Strom, 144 Ga. 324 ( 87 S. E. 20 ) ; Grant v. Southern Bell Tel.

1928Forsyth v. Freer, 64 Ga. 281 ; Huff v. Brantley, 66 Ga. 599 ; Diets v. Fahy, 107 Ga. 325 ( 33 S. E. 51 ) ; Carter v. Johnson, 112 Ga. 494 (2) ( 37 S. E. 736 ) ; Heery v. Burkhalter, 113 Ga. 1043 ( 39 S. E. 406 ) ; Crawford v. Goodwin, 128 Ga. 134 (2) ( 57 S. E. 240 ) ; Brandon v. Akers, 134 Ga. 78 (3) ( 67 S. E. 540 ); First National Bank of Forsyth v. Taylor, 138 Ga. 119 ( 74 S. E. 783 ); Cunningham v. Strom, 144 Ga. 324 ( 87 S. E. 20 ) ; Grant v. Southern Bell Tel.

31912–1928
Heery v. Burkhalter green
ga · 1901
2 sentences

1928Forsyth v. Freer, 64 Ga. 281 ; Huff v. Brantley, 66 Ga. 599 ; Diets v. Fahy, 107 Ga. 325 ( 33 S. E. 51 ) ; Carter v. Johnson, 112 Ga. 494 (2) ( 37 S. E. 736 ) ; Heery v. Burkhalter, 113 Ga. 1043 ( 39 S. E. 406 ) ; Crawford v. Goodwin, 128 Ga. 134 (2) ( 57 S. E. 240 ) ; Brandon v. Akers, 134 Ga. 78 (3) ( 67 S. E. 540 ); First National Bank of Forsyth v. Taylor, 138 Ga. 119 ( 74 S. E. 783 ); Cunningham v. Strom, 144 Ga. 324 ( 87 S. E. 20 ) ; Grant v. Southern Bell Tel.

1928Forsyth v. Freer, 64 Ga. 281 ; Huff v. Brantley, 66 Ga. 599 ; Diets v. Fahy, 107 Ga. 325 ( 33 S. E. 51 ) ; Carter v. Johnson, 112 Ga. 494 (2) ( 37 S. E. 736 ) ; Heery v. Burkhalter, 113 Ga. 1043 ( 39 S. E. 406 ) ; Crawford v. Goodwin, 128 Ga. 134 (2) ( 57 S. E. 240 ) ; Brandon v. Akers, 134 Ga. 78 (3) ( 67 S. E. 540 ); First National Bank of Forsyth v. Taylor, 138 Ga. 119 ( 74 S. E. 783 ); Cunningham v. Strom, 144 Ga. 324 ( 87 S. E. 20 ) ; Grant v. Southern Bell Tel.

31912–1928
Brandon & Co. v. Akers neutral
ga · 1910
2 sentences

1928Forsyth v. Freer, 64 Ga. 281 ; Huff v. Brantley, 66 Ga. 599 ; Diets v. Fahy, 107 Ga. 325 ( 33 S. E. 51 ) ; Carter v. Johnson, 112 Ga. 494 (2) ( 37 S. E. 736 ) ; Heery v. Burkhalter, 113 Ga. 1043 ( 39 S. E. 406 ) ; Crawford v. Goodwin, 128 Ga. 134 (2) ( 57 S. E. 240 ) ; Brandon v. Akers, 134 Ga. 78 (3) ( 67 S. E. 540 ); First National Bank of Forsyth v. Taylor, 138 Ga. 119 ( 74 S. E. 783 ); Cunningham v. Strom, 144 Ga. 324 ( 87 S. E. 20 ) ; Grant v. Southern Bell Tel.

1928Forsyth v. Freer, 64 Ga. 281 ; Huff v. Brantley, 66 Ga. 599 ; Diets v. Fahy, 107 Ga. 325 ( 33 S. E. 51 ) ; Carter v. Johnson, 112 Ga. 494 (2) ( 37 S. E. 736 ) ; Heery v. Burkhalter, 113 Ga. 1043 ( 39 S. E. 406 ) ; Crawford v. Goodwin, 128 Ga. 134 (2) ( 57 S. E. 240 ) ; Brandon v. Akers, 134 Ga. 78 (3) ( 67 S. E. 540 ); First National Bank of Forsyth v. Taylor, 138 Ga. 119 ( 74 S. E. 783 ); Cunningham v. Strom, 144 Ga. 324 ( 87 S. E. 20 ) ; Grant v. Southern Bell Tel.

31912–1928
Huff v. Brantley neutral
ga · 1881
2 sentences

1928Forsyth v. Freer, 64 Ga. 281 ; Huff v. Brantley, 66 Ga. 599 ; Diets v. Fahy, 107 Ga. 325 ( 33 S. E. 51 ) ; Carter v. Johnson, 112 Ga. 494 (2) ( 37 S. E. 736 ) ; Heery v. Burkhalter, 113 Ga. 1043 ( 39 S. E. 406 ) ; Crawford v. Goodwin, 128 Ga. 134 (2) ( 57 S. E. 240 ) ; Brandon v. Akers, 134 Ga. 78 (3) ( 67 S. E. 540 ); First National Bank of Forsyth v. Taylor, 138 Ga. 119 ( 74 S. E. 783 ); Cunningham v. Strom, 144 Ga. 324 ( 87 S. E. 20 ) ; Grant v. Southern Bell Tel.

1926Forsyth v. Preer, 64 Ga. 281 ; Huff v. Brantley, 66 Ga. 599 ; Dietz v. Fahy, 107 Ga. 325 ( 33 S. E. 51 ) ; Carter v. Johnson, 112 Ga. 494 (2) ( 37 S. E. 736 ); Heery v. Burkhalter, 113 Ga. 1043 ( 39 S. E. 406 ) ; Crawford v. Goodwin, 128 Ga. 134 (2) ( 57 S. E. 240 ) ; Brandon v. Akers, 134 Ga. 78 (3) ( 67 S. E. 540 ).” First National Bank of Forsyth v. Taylor, 138 Ga. 119 ( 74 S. E. 783 ) ; Cunningham v. Strom, 144 Ga. 324 ( 87 S. E. 20 ) ; Grant v. Southern Bell Tel.

31912–1928
Cunningham v. Strom neutral
ga · 1915
2 sentences

1928Forsyth v. Freer, 64 Ga. 281 ; Huff v. Brantley, 66 Ga. 599 ; Diets v. Fahy, 107 Ga. 325 ( 33 S. E. 51 ) ; Carter v. Johnson, 112 Ga. 494 (2) ( 37 S. E. 736 ) ; Heery v. Burkhalter, 113 Ga. 1043 ( 39 S. E. 406 ) ; Crawford v. Goodwin, 128 Ga. 134 (2) ( 57 S. E. 240 ) ; Brandon v. Akers, 134 Ga. 78 (3) ( 67 S. E. 540 ); First National Bank of Forsyth v. Taylor, 138 Ga. 119 ( 74 S. E. 783 ); Cunningham v. Strom, 144 Ga. 324 ( 87 S. E. 20 ) ; Grant v. Southern Bell Tel.

1928Forsyth v. Freer, 64 Ga. 281 ; Huff v. Brantley, 66 Ga. 599 ; Diets v. Fahy, 107 Ga. 325 ( 33 S. E. 51 ) ; Carter v. Johnson, 112 Ga. 494 (2) ( 37 S. E. 736 ) ; Heery v. Burkhalter, 113 Ga. 1043 ( 39 S. E. 406 ) ; Crawford v. Goodwin, 128 Ga. 134 (2) ( 57 S. E. 240 ) ; Brandon v. Akers, 134 Ga. 78 (3) ( 67 S. E. 540 ); First National Bank of Forsyth v. Taylor, 138 Ga. 119 ( 74 S. E. 783 ); Cunningham v. Strom, 144 Ga. 324 ( 87 S. E. 20 ) ; Grant v. Southern Bell Tel.

21926–1928
Suggs v. Suggs green
ga · 1943
2 sentences

1957Where, under circumstances as just related, the successor to the judge who overruled the motion for new trial certified the bill of exceptions, this court is without jurisdiction to pass upon the errors alleged to have been committed.” Suggs v. Suggs, 196 Ga. 505 ( 26 S. E. 2d 886 ). 2.

1957Where, under circumstances as just related, the successor to the judge who overruled the motion for new trial certified the bill of exceptions, this court is without jurisdiction to pass upon the errors alleged to have been committed.” Suggs v. Suggs, 196 Ga. 505 ( 26 S. E. 2d 886 ). 2.

11957–1957
Dill v. Taylor neutral
ga · 1925
2 sentences

1937“It must affirmatively appear from the bill of exceptions or the entries thereon, or the record, that the bill of exceptions was presented within the time prescribed by law.” Dill v. Taylor, 160 Ga. 234 ( 127 S. E. 737 ). 4.

1937“It must affirmatively appear from the bill of exceptions or the entries thereon, or the record, that the bill of exceptions was presented within the time prescribed by law.” Dill v. Taylor, 160 Ga. 234 ( 127 S. E. 737 ). 4.

11937–1937
Birmingham Finance Co. v. Chisholm neutral
ga · 1926
2 sentences

1937“The law embodied in the Civil Code [1910], § 6152 [1933, § 6-902] does not in any case authorize delay in tendering to a trial judge a bill of exceptions alleging error in a judgment rendered during a given term, for more than thirty days after the final adjournment of the court for that term.” Birmingham Finance Co. v. Chisholm, 162 Ga. 501 ( 134 S. E. 301 ), and cit. 3.

1937“The law embodied in the Civil Code [1910], § 6152 [1933, § 6-902] does not in any case authorize delay in tendering to a trial judge a bill of exceptions alleging error in a judgment rendered during a given term, for more than thirty days after the final adjournment of the court for that term.” Birmingham Finance Co. v. Chisholm, 162 Ga. 501 ( 134 S. E. 301 ), and cit. 3.

11937–1937
Mott v. Brunswick Publishing Co. neutral
ga · 1903
2 sentences

1918The ruling in Mott v. Brunswick Publishing Co., 117 Ga. 149 ( 43 S. E. 716 ), that where a judgment was rendered at chambers on June 30, 1902, and a bill of exceptions alleging error therein was tendered to the judge on July 30, 1902, this was not within 30 days from the date of the decision (the month of June having but 30 days), was declared, in Rusk v. Hill, 117 Ga. 722, 726, 727 ( 45 S. E. 42 ), to be erroneous, since, in computing the number of days included by this period!, only the first or last day could be counted, and not both the first and the last.

1918The ruling in Mott v. Brunswick Publishing Co., 117 Ga. 149 ( 43 S. E. 716 ), that where a judgment was rendered at chambers on June 30, 1902, and a bill of exceptions alleging error therein was tendered to the judge on July 30, 1902, this was not within 30 days from the date of the decision (the month of June having but 30 days), was declared, in Rusk v. Hill, 117 Ga. 722, 726, 727 ( 45 S. E. 42 ), to be erroneous, since, in computing the number of days included by this period!, only the first or last day could be counted, and not both the first and the last.

11918–1918
Peterson v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. green
ga · 1896
1 sentence

1903Co., 97 Ga. 798 , and cases cited; Jones v. Kern, 101 Ga. 309 .

11903–1903
Jones v. Kern green
ga · 1897
1 sentence

1903Co., 97 Ga. 798 , and cases cited; Jones v. Kern, 101 Ga. 309 .

11903–1903
Clay v. Smith green
ga · 1899
1 sentence

1900Clay v. Smith, 108 Ga. 189 ; Newman v. Day, Id. 813. 3.

11900–1900

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check