holding of a commitment hearing (Georgia) · Go Syfert
← Georgia issues

holding of a commitment hearing in Georgia

12 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1972–1976 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Holmes v. Stategreen
ga · 1968 · cited in 5 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1972–1974
2 sentences

1974The holding of a commitment hearing is not a requisite to a trial for commission of a felony." Holmes v. State, 224 Ga. 553, 556 (2) ( 163 SE2d 803 ).

1974The holding of a commitment hearing is not a requisite to a trial for commission of a felony." Holmes v. State, 224 Ga. 553, 556 (2) ( 163 SE2d 803 ).

25

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (9)

CaseCitedYears
Burston v. Caldwell green
ga · 1972
2 sentences

1973Code § 27-407 recites that it "is simply to determine whether there is sufficient reason to suspect the guilt of the accused, to require him to appear and answer before the court competent to try him; and whenever such probable cause exists, it is the duty of the court to commit.” Holmes v. State, 224 Ga. 553, 556 ( 163 SE2d 803 ); Burston v. Caldwell, 228 Ga. 795 (3) ( 187 SE2d 900 ). 3.

1973Code § 27-407 recites that it "is simply to determine whether there is sufficient reason to suspect the guilt of the accused, to require him to appear and answer before the court competent to try him; and whenever such probable cause exists, it is the duty of the court to commit.” Holmes v. State, 224 Ga. 553, 556 ( 163 SE2d 803 ); Burston v. Caldwell, 228 Ga. 795 (3) ( 187 SE2d 900 ). 3.

51972–1973
Brown v. Holland green
ga · 1972
2 sentences

1972Brown v. Holland, 228 Ga. 628 ( 187 SE2d 246 ) and Burston v. Caldwell, 228 Ga. 795 ( 187 SE2d 900 ).

1972Brown v. Holland, 228 Ga. 628 ( 187 SE2d 246 ) and Burston v. Caldwell, 228 Ga. 795 ( 187 SE2d 900 ).

41972–1972
Cannon v. Grimes green
ga · 1967
2 sentences

1972Code § 27-407 recites that it "is simply to determine whether there is sufficient reason to suspect the guilt of the accused, to require him to appear and answer before the court com *586 petent to try him; and whenever such probable cause exists, it is the duty of the court to commit.” Holmes v. State, 224 Ga. 553 ( 163 SE2d 803 ); Cannon v. Grimes, 223 Ga. 35 ( 153 SE2d 445 ).

1972Code § 27-407 recites that it "is simply to determine whether there is sufficient reason to suspect the guilt of the accused, to require him to appear and answer before the court com *586 petent to try him; and whenever such probable cause exists, it is the duty of the court to commit.” Holmes v. State, 224 Ga. 553 ( 163 SE2d 803 ); Cannon v. Grimes, 223 Ga. 35 ( 153 SE2d 445 ).

31972–1972
Brand v. Wofford green
ga · 1973
2 sentences

1974"The holding of a commitment hearing is not a requisite to a trial for the commission of a felony.” Brand v. Wofford, 230 Ga. 750 (2) ( 199 SE2d 231 ).

1974"The holding of a commitment hearing is not a requisite to a trial for the commission of a felony.” Brand v. Wofford, 230 Ga. 750 (2) ( 199 SE2d 231 ).

21974–1974
State v. Houston green
ga · 1975
2 sentences

1976"The appellant was not entitled to be informed of the charges against him prior to trial other than by indictment.” Phillips v. Stynchcombe, 231 Ga. 430 (3) ( 202 SE2d 26 ). " 'The holding of a commitment hearing is not a requisite to a trial for the commission of a felony.’ ” State v. Houston, 234 Ga. 721 ( 218 SE2d 13 ).

1976"The appellant was not entitled to be informed of the charges against him prior to trial other than by indictment.” Phillips v. Stynchcombe, 231 Ga. 430 (3) ( 202 SE2d 26 ). " 'The holding of a commitment hearing is not a requisite to a trial for the commission of a felony.’ ” State v. Houston, 234 Ga. 721 ( 218 SE2d 13 ).

11976–1976
Phillips v. Stynchcombe green
ga · 1973
2 sentences

1976"The appellant was not entitled to be informed of the charges against him prior to trial other than by indictment.” Phillips v. Stynchcombe, 231 Ga. 430 (3) ( 202 SE2d 26 ). " 'The holding of a commitment hearing is not a requisite to a trial for the commission of a felony.’ ” State v. Houston, 234 Ga. 721 ( 218 SE2d 13 ).

1976"The appellant was not entitled to be informed of the charges against him prior to trial other than by indictment.” Phillips v. Stynchcombe, 231 Ga. 430 (3) ( 202 SE2d 26 ). " 'The holding of a commitment hearing is not a requisite to a trial for the commission of a felony.’ ” State v. Houston, 234 Ga. 721 ( 218 SE2d 13 ).

11976–1976
Coleman v. Alabama green
scotus · 1970
2 sentences

1972It should also be noted that since the rendition of Coleman v. Alabama, supra, the Supreme Court of Georgia ruled in Smith v. Brown, 228 Ga. 584 ( 187 SE2d 142 ) that "The holding of a commitment hearing is not a requisite to a trial for the commission of a felony.

1972It should also be noted that since the rendition of coleman v. Alabama, supra, the Supreme Court of Georgia ruled in Smith v. Brown, 228 Ga. 584 ( 187 SE2d 142 ) that "The holding of a commitment hearing is not a requisite to a trial for the commission of a felony.

11972–1972
Cline v. Smith green
ga · 1972
2 sentences

1972Code § 27-307 recites that it 'is simply to determine whether there is sufficient reason to suspect the guilt of the accused, to require him to appear and answer before the court competent to try him; and whenever such probable cause exists, it is the duty of the court to commit.’ Holmes v. State, 224 Ga. 553 ( 163 SE2d 803 ); Cannon v. Grimes, 223 Ga. 35 ( 153 SE2d 445 ),” and in Cline v. Smith, 229 Ga. 190 ( 190 SE2d 51 ), that the absence of a commitment hearing does not divest the criminal court of jurisdiction.

1972Code § 27-307 recites that it 'is simply to determine whether there is sufficient reason to suspect the guilt of the accused, to require him to appear and answer before the court competent to try him; and whenever such probable cause exists, it is the duty of the court to commit.’ Holmes v. State, 224 Ga. 553 ( 163 SE2d 803 ); Cannon v. Grimes, 223 Ga. 35 ( 153 SE2d 445 ),” and in Cline v. Smith, 229 Ga. 190 ( 190 SE2d 51 ), that the absence of a commitment hearing does not divest the criminal court of jurisdiction.

11972–1972
Smith v. Brown green
ga · 1972
2 sentences

1972It should also be noted that since the rendition of Coleman v. Alabama, supra, the Supreme Court of Georgia ruled in Smith v. Brown, 228 Ga. 584 ( 187 SE2d 142 ) that "The holding of a commitment hearing is not a requisite to a trial for the commission of a felony.

1972It should also be noted that since the rendition of Coleman v. Alabama, supra, the Supreme Court of Georgia ruled in Smith v. Brown, 228 Ga. 584 ( 187 SE2d 142 ) that "The holding of a commitment hearing is not a requisite to a trial for the commission of a felony.

11972–1972

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check