Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1970–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Watsongreen2 sentences2013Cf. State v. Watson, 292 Ga. App. 831, 833 ( 666 SE2d 90 ) (2008) (“Given the uncertainty regarding the basis for the ruling, we vacate the order granting Watson’s motion to suppress and remand the case to the trial court.”). 319 Ga. App. 662 ( 738 SE2d 116 ) (2013). 2013Cf. State v. Watson, 292 Ga. App. 831, 833 ( 666 SE2d 90 ) (2008) (“Given the uncertainty regarding the basis for the ruling, we vacate the order granting Watson’s motion to suppress and remand the case to the trial court.”). 319 Ga. App. 662 ( 738 SE2d 116 ) (2013). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Mullinsgreen2 sentences2017“The State [bears] the burden of proving that the case is not barred by the *681 statute of limitation.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) State v. Mullins, 321 Ga. App. 671, 671 ( 742 SE2d 490 ) (2013) (affirming trial court’s grant of plea in bar where State failed to plead and prove indictment not barred by applicable statute of limitation). 2017“The State [bears] the burden of proving that the case is not barred by the *681 statute of limitation.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) State v. Mullins, 321 Ga. App. 671, 671 ( 742 SE2d 490 ) (2013) (affirming trial court’s grant of plea in bar where State failed to plead and prove indictment not barred by applicable statute of limitation). | 1 | 1 |
Kollie v. Stategreen2 sentences2013See, e.g., Kollie v. State, 301 Ga. App. 534, 547 (15) ( 687 SE2d 869 ) (2009) (vacating and remanding case for the purpose of conducting a new hearing and considering new precedent). 2013See, e.g., Kollie v. State, 301 Ga. App. 534, 547 (15) ( 687 SE2d 869 ) (2009) (vacating and remanding case for the purpose of conducting a new hearing and considering new precedent). | 1 | 1 |
Brown v. Stategreen1 sentence2011We therefore vacate the trial court’s denial of Watson’s motion and remand this case to the trial court in order to “develop the record regarding his claim of ineffectiveness,” after which Watson may “appeal [any] denial of that motion.” (Punctuation omitted.) Brown, 295 Ga. App. at 108 (reversing trial court’s denial of motion to withdraw plea and remanding for further proceedings on the question of previous counsel’s ineffectiveness); Hills, 296 Ga. App. at 103-104 (vacating denial of motion to withdraw plea and remanding for evidentiary hearing on defendant’s claim that post-conviction coun | 1 | 1 |
Hills v. Stategreen1 sentence2011We therefore vacate the trial court’s denial of Watson’s motion and remand this case to the trial court in order to “develop the record regarding his claim of ineffectiveness,” after which Watson may “appeal [any] denial of that motion.” (Punctuation omitted.) Brown, 295 Ga. App. at 108 (reversing trial court’s denial of motion to withdraw plea and remanding for further proceedings on the question of previous counsel’s ineffectiveness); Hills, 296 Ga. App. at 103-104 (vacating denial of motion to withdraw plea and remanding for evidentiary hearing on defendant’s claim that post-conviction coun | 1 | 1 |
Shouse v. Stategreen2 sentences2011See, e.g., Shouse v. State, 231 Ga. 716 (8) ( 203 SE2d 537 ) (1974). 8. 2011See, e.g., Shouse v. State, 231 Ga. 716 (8) ( 203 SE2d 537 ) (1974). 8. | 1 | 1 |
Threatt v. Stategreen2 sentences2010See Threatt v. State, 240 Ga. App. 592, 596-597 (1) ( 524 SE2d 276 ) (1999). 2010See Threatt v. State, 240 Ga. App. 592, 596-597 (1) ( 524 SE2d 276 ) (1999). | 1 | 1 |
Pasha v. Stategreen2 sentences2010Blackburn, P. J., and Doyle, J., concur. 1 Watson was in his mid-forties at the time. 2 The trial judge ruled from the bench on Watson’s motion to suppress and gave no basis for his decision. 3 “Evidence suppressed because of an illegal search does not become ‘sacred and inaccessible.’ ’’ (Citation omitted.) Pasha v. State, 273 Ga. App. 788, 791 (2) ( 616 SE2d 135 ) (2005). 4 While both exceptions depend upon this basic analysis, they are in fact distinct: When properly applied, the “independent source” exception allows the prosecution to use evidence only if it was, in fact, obtained by fully 2010Blackburn, P. J., and Doyle, J., concur. 1 Watson was in his mid-forties at the time. 2 The trial judge ruled from the bench on Watson’s motion to suppress and gave no basis for his decision. 3 “Evidence suppressed because of an illegal search does not become ‘sacred and inaccessible.’ ’’ (Citation omitted.) Pasha v. State, 273 Ga. App. 788, 791 (2) ( 616 SE2d 135 ) (2005). 4 While both exceptions depend upon this basic analysis, they are in fact distinct: When properly applied, the “independent source” exception allows the prosecution to use evidence only if it was, in fact, obtained by fully | 1 | 1 |
Espinoza v. Stategreen2 sentences2008Andrews and Bernes, JJ., concur. 1 See Vansant v. State, 264 Ga. 319, 320 (1) ( 443 SE2d 474 ) (1994). 2 See Galbreath v. State, 213 Ga. App. 80, 82 (2) ( 443 SE2d 664 ) (1994). 3 See Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U. S. 443, 464-473 (91 SC 2022, 29 LE2d 564) (1971); State v. Lyons, 167 Ga. App. 747, 748 ( 307 SE2d 285 ) (1983). 4 See Katz v. United States, 389 U. S. 347 (88 SC 507, 19 LE2d 576) (1967); Espinoza v. State, 265 Ga. 171, 172 (2) ( 454 SE2d 765 ) (1995). 5 King v. State, 289 Ga. App. 461, 464 (2) ( 657 SE2d 570 ) (2008). 2008Andrews and Bernes, JJ., concur. 1 See Vansant v. State, 264 Ga. 319, 320 (1) ( 443 SE2d 474 ) (1994). 2 See Galbreath v. State, 213 Ga. App. 80, 82 (2) ( 443 SE2d 664 ) (1994). 3 See Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U. S. 443, 464-473 (91 SC 2022, 29 LE2d 564) (1971); State v. Lyons, 167 Ga. App. 747, 748 ( 307 SE2d 285 ) (1983). 4 See Katz v. United States, 389 U. S. 347 (88 SC 507, 19 LE2d 576) (1967); Espinoza v. State, 265 Ga. 171, 172 (2) ( 454 SE2d 765 ) (1995). 5 King v. State, 289 Ga. App. 461, 464 (2) ( 657 SE2d 570 ) (2008). | 1 | 1 |
King v. Stategreen2 sentences2008Andrews and Bernes, JJ., concur. 1 See Vansant v. State, 264 Ga. 319, 320 (1) ( 443 SE2d 474 ) (1994). 2 See Galbreath v. State, 213 Ga. App. 80, 82 (2) ( 443 SE2d 664 ) (1994). 3 See Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U. S. 443, 464-473 (91 SC 2022, 29 LE2d 564) (1971); State v. Lyons, 167 Ga. App. 747, 748 ( 307 SE2d 285 ) (1983). 4 See Katz v. United States, 389 U. S. 347 (88 SC 507, 19 LE2d 576) (1967); Espinoza v. State, 265 Ga. 171, 172 (2) ( 454 SE2d 765 ) (1995). 5 King v. State, 289 Ga. App. 461, 464 (2) ( 657 SE2d 570 ) (2008). 2008Andrews and Bernes, JJ., concur. 1 See Vansant v. State, 264 Ga. 319, 320 (1) ( 443 SE2d 474 ) (1994). 2 See Galbreath v. State, 213 Ga. App. 80, 82 (2) ( 443 SE2d 664 ) (1994). 3 See Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U. S. 443, 464-473 (91 SC 2022, 29 LE2d 564) (1971); State v. Lyons, 167 Ga. App. 747, 748 ( 307 SE2d 285 ) (1983). 4 See Katz v. United States, 389 U. S. 347 (88 SC 507, 19 LE2d 576) (1967); Espinoza v. State, 265 Ga. 171, 172 (2) ( 454 SE2d 765 ) (1995). 5 King v. State, 289 Ga. App. 461, 464 (2) ( 657 SE2d 570 ) (2008). | 1 | 1 |
Coolidge v. New Hampshiregreen1 sentence2008Andrews and Bernes, JJ., concur. 1 See Vansant v. State, 264 Ga. 319, 320 (1) ( 443 SE2d 474 ) (1994). 2 See Galbreath v. State, 213 Ga. App. 80, 82 (2) ( 443 SE2d 664 ) (1994). 3 See Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U. S. 443, 464-473 (91 SC 2022, 29 LE2d 564) (1971); State v. Lyons, 167 Ga. App. 747, 748 ( 307 SE2d 285 ) (1983). 4 See Katz v. United States, 389 U. S. 347 (88 SC 507, 19 LE2d 576) (1967); Espinoza v. State, 265 Ga. 171, 172 (2) ( 454 SE2d 765 ) (1995). 5 King v. State, 289 Ga. App. 461, 464 (2) ( 657 SE2d 570 ) (2008). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Lyonsgreen2 sentences2008Andrews and Bernes, JJ., concur. 1 See Vansant v. State, 264 Ga. 319, 320 (1) ( 443 SE2d 474 ) (1994). 2 See Galbreath v. State, 213 Ga. App. 80, 82 (2) ( 443 SE2d 664 ) (1994). 3 See Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U. S. 443, 464-473 (91 SC 2022, 29 LE2d 564) (1971); State v. Lyons, 167 Ga. App. 747, 748 ( 307 SE2d 285 ) (1983). 4 See Katz v. United States, 389 U. S. 347 (88 SC 507, 19 LE2d 576) (1967); Espinoza v. State, 265 Ga. 171, 172 (2) ( 454 SE2d 765 ) (1995). 5 King v. State, 289 Ga. App. 461, 464 (2) ( 657 SE2d 570 ) (2008). 2008Andrews and Bernes, JJ., concur. 1 See Vansant v. State, 264 Ga. 319, 320 (1) ( 443 SE2d 474 ) (1994). 2 See Galbreath v. State, 213 Ga. App. 80, 82 (2) ( 443 SE2d 664 ) (1994). 3 See Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U. S. 443, 464-473 (91 SC 2022, 29 LE2d 564) (1971); State v. Lyons, 167 Ga. App. 747, 748 ( 307 SE2d 285 ) (1983). 4 See Katz v. United States, 389 U. S. 347 (88 SC 507, 19 LE2d 576) (1967); Espinoza v. State, 265 Ga. 171, 172 (2) ( 454 SE2d 765 ) (1995). 5 King v. State, 289 Ga. App. 461, 464 (2) ( 657 SE2d 570 ) (2008). | 1 | 1 |
Galbreath v. Stategreen2 sentences2008Andrews and Bernes, JJ., concur. 1 See Vansant v. State, 264 Ga. 319, 320 (1) ( 443 SE2d 474 ) (1994). 2 See Galbreath v. State, 213 Ga. App. 80, 82 (2) ( 443 SE2d 664 ) (1994). 3 See Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U. S. 443, 464-473 (91 SC 2022, 29 LE2d 564) (1971); State v. Lyons, 167 Ga. App. 747, 748 ( 307 SE2d 285 ) (1983). 4 See Katz v. United States, 389 U. S. 347 (88 SC 507, 19 LE2d 576) (1967); Espinoza v. State, 265 Ga. 171, 172 (2) ( 454 SE2d 765 ) (1995). 5 King v. State, 289 Ga. App. 461, 464 (2) ( 657 SE2d 570 ) (2008). 2008Andrews and Bernes, JJ., concur. 1 See Vansant v. State, 264 Ga. 319, 320 (1) ( 443 SE2d 474 ) (1994). 2 See Galbreath v. State, 213 Ga. App. 80, 82 (2) ( 443 SE2d 664 ) (1994). 3 See Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U. S. 443, 464-473 (91 SC 2022, 29 LE2d 564) (1971); State v. Lyons, 167 Ga. App. 747, 748 ( 307 SE2d 285 ) (1983). 4 See Katz v. United States, 389 U. S. 347 (88 SC 507, 19 LE2d 576) (1967); Espinoza v. State, 265 Ga. 171, 172 (2) ( 454 SE2d 765 ) (1995). 5 King v. State, 289 Ga. App. 461, 464 (2) ( 657 SE2d 570 ) (2008). | 1 | 1 |
Vansant v. Stategreen2 sentences2008Andrews and Bernes, JJ., concur. 1 See Vansant v. State, 264 Ga. 319, 320 (1) ( 443 SE2d 474 ) (1994). 2 See Galbreath v. State, 213 Ga. App. 80, 82 (2) ( 443 SE2d 664 ) (1994). 3 See Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U. S. 443, 464-473 (91 SC 2022, 29 LE2d 564) (1971); State v. Lyons, 167 Ga. App. 747, 748 ( 307 SE2d 285 ) (1983). 4 See Katz v. United States, 389 U. S. 347 (88 SC 507, 19 LE2d 576) (1967); Espinoza v. State, 265 Ga. 171, 172 (2) ( 454 SE2d 765 ) (1995). 5 King v. State, 289 Ga. App. 461, 464 (2) ( 657 SE2d 570 ) (2008). 2008Andrews and Bernes, JJ., concur. 1 See Vansant v. State, 264 Ga. 319, 320 (1) ( 443 SE2d 474 ) (1994). 2 See Galbreath v. State, 213 Ga. App. 80, 82 (2) ( 443 SE2d 664 ) (1994). 3 See Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U. S. 443, 464-473 (91 SC 2022, 29 LE2d 564) (1971); State v. Lyons, 167 Ga. App. 747, 748 ( 307 SE2d 285 ) (1983). 4 See Katz v. United States, 389 U. S. 347 (88 SC 507, 19 LE2d 576) (1967); Espinoza v. State, 265 Ga. 171, 172 (2) ( 454 SE2d 765 ) (1995). 5 King v. State, 289 Ga. App. 461, 464 (2) ( 657 SE2d 570 ) (2008). | 1 | 1 |
Welborn v. Stategreen2 sentences2003“Therefore, we consider the trial evidence only.” Welborn v. State, 232 Ga. App. 837, 839, n. 2 ( 503 SE2d 85 ) (1998). 2003“Therefore, we consider the trial evidence only.” Welborn v. State, 232 Ga. App. 837, 839, n. 2 ( 503 SE2d 85 ) (1998). | 1 | 1 |
Gray v. Stategreen2 sentences2000We affirm. “[A]ny statement which [a] defendant [makes] during the course of his self-representation stem[s] from his decision to represent himself.” Gray v. State, 204 Ga. App. 33, 35 (5) ( 418 SE2d 412 ) (1992). 2000We affirm. “[A]ny statement which [a] defendant [makes] during the course of his self-representation stem[s] from his decision to represent himself.” Gray v. State, 204 Ga. App. 33, 35 (5) ( 418 SE2d 412 ) (1992). | 1 | 1 |
King v. Codisco, Inc.green2 sentences1996Court of Appeals Rule 27 (c) (2); King v. Codisco, 217 Ga. App. 704, 705 (3) ( 458 SE2d 881 ) (1995). 1996Court of Appeals Rule 27 (c) (2); King v. Codisco, 217 Ga. App. 704, 705 (3) ( 458 SE2d 881 ) (1995). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Watson v. State
green
2 sentences2021And, pertinent to the case before us, the Court held that Watson’s violation of oath conviction was unsupported because that count of the indictment was expressly 4 293 Ga. 817 ( 750 SE2d 143 ) (2013). 5 See id. at 818 . 6 See id. 7 Id. at 820 (1). 6 conditioned on soliciting sodomy: “said accused . . . did . . . willfully and intentionally violate the terms of his sworn oath to comply with the laws of the State of Georgia by soliciting sodomy in violation of 16-6-15 (a). . . .”8 In light of this, the Court explained that if “the defendant is charged by a narrowly drawn indictment with a speci 2021And, pertinent to the case before us, the Court held that Watson’s violation of oath conviction was unsupported because that count of the indictment was expressly 4 293 Ga. 817 ( 750 SE2d 143 ) (2013). 5 See id. at 818 . 6 See id. 7 Id. at 820 (1). 6 conditioned on soliciting sodomy: “said accused . . . did . . . willfully and intentionally violate the terms of his sworn oath to comply with the laws of the State of Georgia by soliciting sodomy in violation of 16-6-15 (a). . . .”8 In light of this, the Court explained that if “the defendant is charged by a narrowly drawn indictment with a speci | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Hernandez-Lopez v. State
green
2 sentences2013Cf. State v. Watson, 292 Ga. App. 831, 833 ( 666 SE2d 90 ) (2008) (“Given the uncertainty regarding the basis for the ruling, we vacate the order granting Watson’s motion to suppress and remand the case to the trial court.”). 319 Ga. App. 662 ( 738 SE2d 116 ) (2013). 2013Cf. State v. Watson, 292 Ga. App. 831, 833 ( 666 SE2d 90 ) (2008) (“Given the uncertainty regarding the basis for the ruling, we vacate the order granting Watson’s motion to suppress and remand the case to the trial court.”). 319 Ga. App. 662 ( 738 SE2d 116 ) (2013). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Katz v. United States
green
1 sentence2008Andrews and Bernes, JJ., concur. 1 See Vansant v. State, 264 Ga. 319, 320 (1) ( 443 SE2d 474 ) (1994). 2 See Galbreath v. State, 213 Ga. App. 80, 82 (2) ( 443 SE2d 664 ) (1994). 3 See Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U. S. 443, 464-473 (91 SC 2022, 29 LE2d 564) (1971); State v. Lyons, 167 Ga. App. 747, 748 ( 307 SE2d 285 ) (1983). 4 See Katz v. United States, 389 U. S. 347 (88 SC 507, 19 LE2d 576) (1967); Espinoza v. State, 265 Ga. 171, 172 (2) ( 454 SE2d 765 ) (1995). 5 King v. State, 289 Ga. App. 461, 464 (2) ( 657 SE2d 570 ) (2008). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
A. M. Kidder & Co. v. Clement A. Evans & Co.
green
1 sentence1970Hester v. Wilson, 117 Ga. App. 435 (5) ( 160 SE2d 859 ). 2. | 1 | 1970–1970 |
Hester v. Wilson
green
1 sentence1970Hester v. Wilson, 117 Ga. App. 435 (5) ( 160 SE2d 859 ). 2. | 1 | 1970–1970 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.