Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1989–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Browngreen2 sentences2005See, e.g., Village of Algonquin v. Ford, 145 Ill.App.3d 19, 21 , 99 Ill.Dec. 148 , 495 N.E.2d 595 (1986) ("No consent is necessary to admit a breath-alcohol test into evidence in a DUI case"); People v. Brown, 175 Ill.App.3d 725, 726-27 , 125 Ill.Dec. 153 , 530 N.E.2d 71 (1988) ("We hold that voluntary consent is not a prerequisite to admissibility of the breathalyzer results"); Giere, 192 Ill.App.3d at 524 , 139 Ill.Dec. 548 , 548 N.E.2d 1104 ("[T]here is no statutory requirement of consent before blood-alcohol test results may be admitted in a DUI prosecution since that requirement was aboli 2005App. 3d 19, 21 (1986) (“No consent is necessary to admit a breath-alcohol test into evidence in a DUI case”); People v. Brown, 175 Ill. | 2 | 3 |
Griffith v. Stategreen2 sentences2008See Griffith, 55 S.W.3d at 603 (finding the defendant’s request to speak to his attorney before deciding whether to submit to a breath-alcohol test was not the same as expressing a desire to remain silent). 2008See Griffith, 55 S.W.3d at 603 (finding the defendant’s request to speak to his attorney before deciding whether to submit to a breath-alcohol test was not the same as expressing a desire to remain silent). | 2 | 2 |
People v. Gieregreen2 sentences2005See, e.g., Village of Algonquin v. Ford, 145 Ill.App.3d 19, 21 , 99 Ill.Dec. 148 , 495 N.E.2d 595 (1986) ("No consent is necessary to admit a breath-alcohol test into evidence in a DUI case"); People v. Brown, 175 Ill.App.3d 725, 726-27 , 125 Ill.Dec. 153 , 530 N.E.2d 71 (1988) ("We hold that voluntary consent is not a prerequisite to admissibility of the breathalyzer results"); Giere, 192 Ill.App.3d at 524 , 139 Ill.Dec. 548 , 548 N.E.2d 1104 ("[T]here is no statutory requirement of consent before blood-alcohol test results may be admitted in a DUI prosecution since that requirement was aboli 2005See, e.g., Village of Algonquin v. Ford, 145 Ill.App.3d 19, 21 , 99 Ill.Dec. 148 , 495 N.E.2d 595 (1986) ("No consent is necessary to admit a breath-alcohol test into evidence in a DUI case"); People v. Brown, 175 Ill.App.3d 725, 726-27 , 125 Ill.Dec. 153 , 530 N.E.2d 71 (1988) ("We hold that voluntary consent is not a prerequisite to admissibility of the breathalyzer results"); Giere, 192 Ill.App.3d at 524 , 139 Ill.Dec. 548 , 548 N.E.2d 1104 ("[T]here is no statutory requirement of consent before blood-alcohol test results may be admitted in a DUI prosecution since that requirement was aboli | 1 | 2 |
People v. Byrdgreen2 sentences2005See, e.g., Village of Algonquin v. Ford, 145 Ill.App.3d 19, 21 , 99 Ill.Dec. 148 , 495 N.E.2d 595 (1986) ("No consent is necessary to admit a breath-alcohol test into evidence in a DUI case"); People v. Brown, 175 Ill.App.3d 725, 726-27 , 125 Ill.Dec. 153 , 530 N.E.2d 71 (1988) ("We hold that voluntary consent is not a prerequisite to admissibility of the breathalyzer results"); Giere, 192 Ill.App.3d at 524 , 139 Ill.Dec. 548 , 548 N.E.2d 1104 ("[T]here is no statutory requirement of consent before blood-alcohol test results may be admitted in a DUI prosecution since that requirement was aboli 2005See, e.g., Village of Algonquin v. Ford, 145 Ill.App.3d 19, 21 , 99 Ill.Dec. 148 , 495 N.E.2d 595 (1986) ("No consent is necessary to admit a breath-alcohol test into evidence in a DUI case"); People v. Brown, 175 Ill.App.3d 725, 726-27 , 125 Ill.Dec. 153 , 530 N.E.2d 71 (1988) ("We hold that voluntary consent is not a prerequisite to admissibility of the breathalyzer results"); Giere, 192 Ill.App.3d at 524 , 139 Ill.Dec. 548 , 548 N.E.2d 1104 ("[T]here is no statutory requirement of consent before blood-alcohol test results may be admitted in a DUI prosecution since that requirement was aboli | 1 | 1 |
City of Chicago v. Truax Greene & Co.green1 sentence2005App. 3d 725, 726-27 (1988) (“We hold that voluntary consent is not a prerequisite to admissibility of the breathalyzer results”); Giere , 192 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Franciskovichgreen2 sentences2005See, e.g., Village of Algonquin v. Ford, 145 Ill.App.3d 19, 21 , 99 Ill.Dec. 148 , 495 N.E.2d 595 (1986) ("No consent is necessary to admit a breath-alcohol test into evidence in a DUI case"); People v. Brown, 175 Ill.App.3d 725, 726-27 , 125 Ill.Dec. 153 , 530 N.E.2d 71 (1988) ("We hold that voluntary consent is not a prerequisite to admissibility of the breathalyzer results"); Giere, 192 Ill.App.3d at 524 , 139 Ill.Dec. 548 , 548 N.E.2d 1104 ("[T]here is no statutory requirement of consent before blood-alcohol test results may be admitted in a DUI prosecution since that requirement was aboli 2005See, e.g., Village of Algonquin v. Ford, 145 Ill.App.3d 19, 21 , 99 Ill.Dec. 148 , 495 N.E.2d 595 (1986) ("No consent is necessary to admit a breath-alcohol test into evidence in a DUI case"); People v. Brown, 175 Ill.App.3d 725, 726-27 , 125 Ill.Dec. 153 , 530 N.E.2d 71 (1988) ("We hold that voluntary consent is not a prerequisite to admissibility of the breathalyzer results"); Giere, 192 Ill.App.3d at 524 , 139 Ill.Dec. 548 , 548 N.E.2d 1104 ("[T]here is no statutory requirement of consent before blood-alcohol test results may be admitted in a DUI prosecution since that requirement was aboli | 1 | 1 |
Village of Algonquin v. Fordgreen2 sentences2005See, e.g., Village of Algonquin v. Ford, 145 Ill.App.3d 19, 21 , 99 Ill.Dec. 148 , 495 N.E.2d 595 (1986) ("No consent is necessary to admit a breath-alcohol test into evidence in a DUI case"); People v. Brown, 175 Ill.App.3d 725, 726-27 , 125 Ill.Dec. 153 , 530 N.E.2d 71 (1988) ("We hold that voluntary consent is not a prerequisite to admissibility of the breathalyzer results"); Giere, 192 Ill.App.3d at 524 , 139 Ill.Dec. 548 , 548 N.E.2d 1104 ("[T]here is no statutory requirement of consent before blood-alcohol test results may be admitted in a DUI prosecution since that requirement was aboli 2005See, e.g., Village of Algonquin v. Ford, 145 Ill.App.3d 19, 21 , 99 Ill.Dec. 148 , 495 N.E.2d 595 (1986) ("No consent is necessary to admit a breath-alcohol test into evidence in a DUI case"); People v. Brown, 175 Ill.App.3d 725, 726-27 , 125 Ill.Dec. 153 , 530 N.E.2d 71 (1988) ("We hold that voluntary consent is not a prerequisite to admissibility of the breathalyzer results"); Giere, 192 Ill.App.3d at 524 , 139 Ill.Dec. 548 , 548 N.E.2d 1104 ("[T]here is no statutory requirement of consent before blood-alcohol test results may be admitted in a DUI prosecution since that requirement was aboli | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Carey
green
2 sentences2010Carey, 386 Ill. 2010Carey, 386 Ill. | 2 | 2010–2010 |
People v. DeLuna
green
2 sentences2008I also find that the majority’s reliance upon People v. DeLuna, 334 Ill. 2008I also find that the majority's reliance upon People v. DeLuna, 334 Ill. | 2 | 2008–2008 |
People v. Bonutti
green
2 sentences2009In other words, a lack of compliance with section 1286.310(a) has the potential to create criminals out of people who are not.” (Emphasis in original.) Bonutti, 212 Ill. 2d at 192 , 817 N.E.2d at 495 . 2009In other words, a lack of compliance with section 1286.310(a) has the potential to create criminals out of people who are not.” (Emphasis in original.) Bonutti, 212 Ill. 2d at 192 , 817 N.E.2d at 495 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
People v. Ayres
green
2 sentences2005See, e.g., Village of Algonquin v. Ford, 145 Ill.App.3d 19, 21 , 99 Ill.Dec. 148 , 495 N.E.2d 595 (1986) ("No consent is necessary to admit a breath-alcohol test into evidence in a DUI case"); People v. Brown, 175 Ill.App.3d 725, 726-27 , 125 Ill.Dec. 153 , 530 N.E.2d 71 (1988) ("We hold that voluntary consent is not a prerequisite to admissibility of the breathalyzer results"); Giere, 192 Ill.App.3d at 524 , 139 Ill.Dec. 548 , 548 N.E.2d 1104 ("[T]here is no statutory requirement of consent before blood-alcohol test results may be admitted in a DUI prosecution since that requirement was aboli 2005See, e.g., Village of Algonquin v. Ford, 145 Ill.App.3d 19, 21 , 99 Ill.Dec. 148 , 495 N.E.2d 595 (1986) ("No consent is necessary to admit a breath-alcohol test into evidence in a DUI case"); People v. Brown, 175 Ill.App.3d 725, 726-27 , 125 Ill.Dec. 153 , 530 N.E.2d 71 (1988) ("We hold that voluntary consent is not a prerequisite to admissibility of the breathalyzer results"); Giere, 192 Ill.App.3d at 524 , 139 Ill.Dec. 548 , 548 N.E.2d 1104 ("[T]here is no statutory requirement of consent before blood-alcohol test results may be admitted in a DUI prosecution since that requirement was aboli | 1 | 2005–2005 |
People v. Keith
green
2 sentences1995In People v. Keith (1992), 148 Ill. 2d 32 , 591 N.E.2d 449 , defendant filed a motion seeking to bar results of a breath-alcohol test from evidence at his trial. 1995In People v. Keith (1992), 148 Ill. 2d 32 , 591 N.E.2d 449 , defendant filed a motion seeking to bar results of a breath-alcohol test from evidence at his trial. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
People v. Kurtz
green
2 sentences1989In light of the facts of this case, whether the result of the breath-alcohol test is stated as .18 (People v. Kurtz (1988), 171 Ill. 1989App. 3d 1068, 1069 , 526 N.E.2d 540, 541 ) or .18% (People v. Thorson (1986), 145 Ill. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
People v. Thorson
green
1 sentence1989App. 3d 1068, 1069 , 526 N.E.2d 540, 541 ) or .18% (People v. Thorson (1986), 145 Ill. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.