Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 2005–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Martinezgreen2 sentences2011Outside the context of plain error, “[a]n unbroken line of precedent mandates that a defendant must object to claimed errors at trial and raise them in his posttrial motions. [Citations.] Otherwise, they are procedurally defaulted or forfeited.” People v. Martinez, 386 Ill. 2011Outside the context of plain error, "[a]n unbroken line of precedent mandates that a defendant must object to claimed errors at trial and raise them in his posttrial motions. [Citation.] Otherwise, they are procedurally defaulted or forfeited." People v. Martinez, 386 Ill. | 1 | 4 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Beangreen2 sentences2005But see People v. Bean , 137 Ill. 2d 65, 80 (1990) (“Our standard of review on this issue is that of the plain error doctrine, for defendant did not raise this issue either through a trial objection or in his post-trial motion”). 2005But see People v. Bean, 137 Ill. 2d 65, 80 (1990) (“Our standard of review on this issue is that of the plain error doctrine, for defendant did not raise this issue either through a trial objection or in his post-trial motion”). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Naylor
green
2 sentences2019Naylor, 229 Ill. 2d at 606-08 . 2018Naylor , 229 Ill. 2d at 606 -08 , 323 Ill.Dec. 381 , 893 N.E.2d 653 . | 6 | 2011–2019 |
People v. Banks
green
2 sentences2011App.3d 153, 163 , 325 Ill.Dec. 340 , 897 N.E.2d 879 (2008) (citing People v. Banks, 161 Ill.2d 119 , 204 Ill.Dec. 107 , 641 N.E.2d 331 (1994) and People v. Naylor, 229 Ill.2d 584 , 323 Ill.Dec. 381 , 893 N.E.2d 653 (2008)). 2011App.3d 153, 163 , 325 Ill.Dec. 340 , 897 N.E.2d 879 (2008) (citing People v. Banks, 161 Ill.2d 119 , 204 Ill.Dec. 107 , 641 N.E.2d 331 (1994) and People v. Naylor, 229 Ill.2d 584 , 323 Ill.Dec. 381 , 893 N.E.2d 653 (2008)). | 4 | 2011–2011 |
People v. Robinson
green
2 sentences2006The only case cited by the defendant for this proposition, People v. Robinson, 172 Ill. 2d 452, 457 , 667 N.E.2d 1305 (1996), concerns “the construction of a statute” and is thus inapposite. 2006The only case cited by the defendant for this proposition, People v. Robinson, 172 Ill. 2d 452, 457 , 667 N.E.2d 1305 (1996), concerns “the construction of a statute” and is thus inapposite. | 2 | 2006–2006 |
People v. Herron
green
1 sentence2024“It refers to the stance that a reviewing court takes with respect to a trial court error, and is thus the wrong label in the context of plain error, where there is no trial court order to review.” Id. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
People v. Townsell
green
1 sentence2020In the context of plain error, the term “waiver” actually means “forfeiture.” Id. ¶ 25 We find defendant’s argument for plain error review unpersuasive because he knowingly waived, rather than forfeited, the claimed error. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.