Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1996–2003 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Boaden v. Department of Law Enforcement
green
2 sentences2001Boaden v. Department of Law Enforcement, 171 Ill. 2d 230 , 664 N.E.2d 61 (1996). 2001Boaden v. Department of Law Enforcement, 171 Ill. 2d 230 , 664 N.E.2d 61 (1996). | 4 | 1998–2001 |
In Re Marriage of Logston
green
2 sentences1997In re Marriage of Logston, 103 Ill. 2d 266 , 469 N.E.2d 167 (1984). 1997In re Marriage of Logston, 103 Ill. 2d 266 , 469 N.E.2d 167 (1984). | 3 | 1996–1997 |
In Re Marriage of May
green
2 sentences1998In re Marriage of May, 286 Ill.App.3d 1060 , 222 Ill. 1998In re Marriage of May, 286 Ill. | 2 | 1998–1998 |
Reda v. Advocate Health Care
green
2 sentences2003Reda, 199 Ill. 2d at 55 , 765 N.E.2d at 1007 . 2003Reda, 199 Ill. 2d at 55 , 765 N.E.2d at 1007 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Vrombaut v. Norcross Safety Products, L.L.C.
green
1 sentence2000Vrombaut, 298 Ill. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
City of Chicago v. Strauss
green
1 sentence1997City of Chicago v. Strauss, 128 Ill. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.