Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1991–2026 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc. v. Poniewozikgreen2 sentences2019See GreenPoint Mortgage, 2014 IL App (1st) 132864, ¶ 24 . 2018See GreenPoint Mortgage , 2014 IL App (1st) 132864 , ¶ 24, 387 Ill.Dec. 833 , 23 N.E.3d 525 . | 2 | 2 |
Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De Guineegreen2 sentences2014Rather, the court held that the Spanish defendants were so "closely related" to the dispute such that it became "foreseeable" that they would be bound by the forum selection clause in the amended cooperation agreement. ¶33 It is well established that "the personal jurisdiction requirement is a waivable right, [and] there are a 'variety of legal arrangements' by which a litigant may give 'express or implied consent to the personal jurisdiction of the court.' " Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 14 1-12-3403 462, 472 n.14 (1985) (quoting Insurance Corp. of Ireland Ltd. v. Compagnie des Bau 2014Rather, the court held that the Spanish defendants were so “closely related” to the dispute such that it became “foreseeable” that they would be bound by the forum selection clause in the amended cooperation agreement. ¶ 33 It is well established that “the personal jurisdiction requirement is a waivable right, [and] there are a ‘variety of legal arrangements’ by which a litigant may give ‘express or implied consent to the personal jurisdiction of the court.’ ” Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 462 , 472 n.14 (1985) (quoting Insurance Corp. of Ireland, Ltd. v. Compagnie des Bauxites de G | 2 | 2 |
Rios v. Bayer Corp.green1 sentence2026See Rios, 2020 IL 125020, ¶ 23 . ¶ 53 Finally, Juristech argues this court should not consider the emails it attached as exhibits to its amended complaint as factual bases from which to analyze personal jurisdiction. | 1 | 1 |
Campbell v. Millsgreen1 sentence2025Contrary to Mead Johnson’s argument, the circuit court correctly noted that the personal jurisdiction analysis focuses “ ‘on the defendant’s activities within the forum State, not on those of the plaintiff.’ ” Campbell v. Mills, 262 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
Sackett Enterprises, Inc. v. Starengreen1 sentence2025App. 3d 624, 627 (1994) (quoting Sackett Enterprises, Inc. v. Staren, 211 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Wells Fargo Bank, Nat'l Ass'n v. Roundtree
green
2 sentences2021“Section 15-1506.6 applies equally to a personal jurisdiction challenge asserted in a section 2-1401 postjudgment petition as it would to a personal jurisdiction challenge asserted during the pendency of the case prior to final judgment.” Id. 2021“Section 15-1506.6 applies equally to a personal jurisdiction challenge asserted in a section 2-1401 postjudgment petition as it would to a personal jurisdiction challenge asserted during the pendency of the case prior to final judgment.” Id. | 2 | 2021–2021 |
Russell v. SNFA
green
2 sentences2021And in this case, we find that Ms. Harding established that Confluent had sufficient minimum contacts to allow Illinois to exercise personal jurisdiction over it and that Confluent has failed to present any uncontradicted evidence rebutting that conclusion. ¶ 24 A. Minimum Contacts ¶ 25 The threshold issue in a personal jurisdiction challenge in Illinois is “the ‘minimum contacts’ test.” Russell, 2013 IL 113909, ¶ 36 . 2020Russell, 2013 IL 113909, ¶ 83 . ¶ 48 Although the Internet has presented another wrinkle in the personal jurisdiction analysis, the general framework has not changed, as the “ultimate analysis is what it has always been— - 10 - whether the quality and nature of the defendant’s contacts with the forum are such that it is fair and reasonable to assert personal jurisdiction.” Innovative Garage Door Co. v. High Ranking Domains, LLC, 2012 IL App (2d) 120117, ¶ 20 . | 2 | 2020–2021 |
Innovative Garage Door Company v. High Ranking Domains, LLC
green
1 sentence2020Russell, 2013 IL 113909, ¶ 83 . ¶ 48 Although the Internet has presented another wrinkle in the personal jurisdiction analysis, the general framework has not changed, as the “ultimate analysis is what it has always been— - 10 - whether the quality and nature of the defendant’s contacts with the forum are such that it is fair and reasonable to assert personal jurisdiction.” Innovative Garage Door Co. v. High Ranking Domains, LLC, 2012 IL App (2d) 120117, ¶ 20 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz
green
1 sentence2014Rather, the court held that the Spanish defendants were so “closely related” to the dispute such that it became “foreseeable” that they would be bound by the forum selection clause in the amended cooperation agreement. ¶ 33 It is well established that “the personal jurisdiction requirement is a waivable right, [and] there are a ‘variety of legal arrangements’ by which a litigant may give ‘express or implied consent to the personal jurisdiction of the court.’ ” Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 462 , 472 n.14 (1985) (quoting Insurance Corp. of Ireland, Ltd. v. Compagnie des Bauxites de G | 1 | 2014–2014 |
In Re Marriage of Schuham
green
1 sentence1994(Schuham, 120 Ill. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Decker Coal Company v. Commonwealth Edison Company
green
1 sentence1991(Decker, 805 F.2d at 841 .) Fourth, Montana clearly has an interest in protecting its citizens from improper conduct of others in the transaction of business. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.