Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 2000–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Havens v. Ritcheygreen2 sentences2011Havens v. Ritchey, 582 N.E.2d 792, 795 (Ind.1991). 2006However, in Havens v. Ritchey, 582 N.E.2d 792, 795 (Ind.1991) our supreme court held that - [a] physician cannot be under a continuing duty to review all files daily to ensure that he did not misdiagnose a condition of a patient he may not have seen for several months or even years. | 4 | 4 |
Coffer v. Arndtgreen2 sentences2014“The doctrine of continuing wrong is not an equitable doctrine; rather, it defines when an act, omission, or neglect took place.” Coffer v. Arndt, 732 N.E.2d 815, 821 (Ind.Ct.App.2000), trans. denied. 2014“The doctrine of continuing wrong is not an equitable doctrine; rather, it defines when an act, omission, or neglect took place.” Coffer v. Arndt, 732 N.E.2d 815, 821 (Ind. Ct. App. 2000), trans. denied. 16 Here, Anonymous Physician was Richard Rogers’ urologist from the date of his first appointment in August 2006 through July 2009. | 3 | 4 |
GRADUS-PIZLO v. Actongreen2 sentences2020Gradus-Pizlo v. Acton, 964 N.E.2d 865, 871 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012) (emphasis added) (citations omitted). 2014Gradus-Pizlo v. Acton, 964 N.E.2d 865, 871 (Ind.Ct.App.2012) (emphasis added) (citations omitted). | 3 | 3 |
Garneau v. Bushgreen2 sentences2020Garneau v. Bush, 838 N.E.2d 1134, 1143 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005) (citations and quotation marks omitted), trans. denied. 2006"The doctrine of continuing wrong is not an equitable doctrine; rather, it defines when an act, omission, or neglect took place." Id. (quoting Coffer v. Arndt, 732 N.E.2d 815, 821 (Ind.Ct.App.2000), trans. denied). | 1 | 4 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hopster v. Burgeson
green
1 sentence2005"The doctrine of continuing wrong is not an equitable doctrine; rather, it defines when an act, omission, or neglect took place." Hopster, 750 N.E.2d at 858 (quoting Coffer v. Arndt, 732 N.E.2d 815, 821 (Ind.Ct.App.2000), trans. denied ). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.