demurrer error in Indiana

12 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1877–1960 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

Case	Followed	Cited
Kahle v. Crown Oil Co.green · 1913 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 1915–1915 2 sentences 1915See also Kahle v. Crown Oil Co. (1913), 180 Ind. 131, 138 , 100 N. E. 681; Taylor v. Griner (1913), 55 Ind. App. 617, 620 , 104 N. E. 607 ; Darter v. Grubb (1913), 56 Ind. App. 206, 208 , 102 N. E. 843 ; Rader v. Barrett Co. (1914), 59 Ind. App. 27, 34 , 108 N. E. 883, 884 . 6. 1915See also Kahle v. Crown Oil Co. (1913), 180 Ind. 131, 138 , 100 N. E. 681; Taylor v. Griner (1913), 55 Ind. App. 617, 620 , 104 N. E. 607 ; Darter v. Grubb (1913), 56 Ind. App. 206, 208 , 102 N. E. 843 ; Rader v. Barrett Co. (1914), 59 Ind. App. 27, 34 , 108 N. E. 883, 884 . 6.	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (22)

Case	Cited	Years
Domestic Block Coal Co. v. DeArmey green ind · 1913 2 sentences 1915Brown and the said deed to the said Leila A. Brown and the said deed to the said Jouvenat, and had also disaffirmed the said written contract or agreement and given proper and due notice of such disaffirmance and demanded reconveyances thereof to herself.” This allegation is amply sufficient to withstand a demurrer under the rule as laid down in the case of Domestic Bloch Coal Co. v. DeArmey (1913), 179 Ind. 592 , 100 N. E. 675 , 102 N. E. 99 , which requires this court to resolve all reasonable inferences in support of the allegations of the complaint. 1915Brown and the said deed to the said Leila A. Brown and the said deed to the said Jouvenat, and had also disaffirmed the said written contract or agreement and given proper and due notice of such disaffirmance and demanded reconveyances thereof to herself.” This allegation is amply sufficient to withstand a demurrer under the rule as laid down in the case of Domestic Bloch Coal Co. v. DeArmey (1913), 179 Ind. 592 , 100 N. E. 675 , 102 N. E. 99 , which requires this court to resolve all reasonable inferences in support of the allegations of the complaint.	2	1914–1915
Lane v. Gugsell green indctapp · 1943 2 sentences 1960Lane v. Gugsell (1943), 113 Ind. App. 676 , 47 N. E. 2d 835 . 1960Lane v. Gugsell (1943), 113 Ind. App. 676 , 47 N. E. 2d 835 .	1	1960–1960
Adams v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. neutral ind · 1905 2 sentences 1932Adams v. Pittsburg, etc., Co. (1905), 165 Ind. 648 , 74 N. E. 991 ; Leonard v. City of Terre Haute (1911), 48 Ind. App. 104 , 93 N. E. 872 ; Smith v. Frantz (1915), 59 Ind. App. 260 , 109 N. E. 407 . 1932Adams v. Pittsburg, etc., Co. (1905), 165 Ind. 648 , 74 N. E. 991 ; Leonard v. City of Terre Haute (1911), 48 Ind. App. 104 , 93 N. E. 872 ; Smith v. Frantz (1915), 59 Ind. App. 260 , 109 N. E. 407 .	1	1932–1932
Leonard v. City of Terre Haute green indctapp · 1911 2 sentences 1932Adams v. Pittsburg, etc., Co. (1905), 165 Ind. 648 , 74 N. E. 991 ; Leonard v. City of Terre Haute (1911), 48 Ind. App. 104 , 93 N. E. 872 ; Smith v. Frantz (1915), 59 Ind. App. 260 , 109 N. E. 407 . 1932Adams v. Pittsburg, etc., Co. (1905), 165 Ind. 648 , 74 N. E. 991 ; Leonard v. City of Terre Haute (1911), 48 Ind. App. 104 , 93 N. E. 872 ; Smith v. Frantz (1915), 59 Ind. App. 260 , 109 N. E. 407 .	1	1932–1932
Smith v. Frantz green indctapp · 1915 2 sentences 1932Adams v. Pittsburg, etc., Co. (1905), 165 Ind. 648 , 74 N. E. 991 ; Leonard v. City of Terre Haute (1911), 48 Ind. App. 104 , 93 N. E. 872 ; Smith v. Frantz (1915), 59 Ind. App. 260 , 109 N. E. 407 . 1932Adams v. Pittsburg, etc., Co. (1905), 165 Ind. 648 , 74 N. E. 991 ; Leonard v. City of Terre Haute (1911), 48 Ind. App. 104 , 93 N. E. 872 ; Smith v. Frantz (1915), 59 Ind. App. 260 , 109 N. E. 407 .	1	1932–1932
Campbell v. Hunt neutral ind · 1885 1 sentence 1930In the case of Campbell v. Hunt (1885), 104 Ind. 21Ó, 2 N. E. 363 , the court said: “It is only where the matter in issue has been actually or presumptively determined, that the judgment is a *660 bar to another action.” The Appellate Court did not by its decision in Bedron v. Baran, supra, establish the facts stated in appellants’ second paragraph of amended complaint.	1	1930–1930
Wallace v. Mertz, Admr. green indctapp · 1927 2 sentences 1929Appellants on rehearing present that, upon the former appeal, Wallace v. Mertz, Admr. (1927), 86 Ind. App. 185 , 156 N. E. 562 , the only error assigned was the ruling of the court on the demurrer to the complaint, and that there was no motion for a hew trial and no error presented except that relating to the ruling on the demurrer to the claim or complaint. 1929Appellants on rehearing present that, upon the former appeal, Wallace v. Mertz, Admr. (1927), 86 Ind. App. 185 , 156 N. E. 562 , the only error assigned was the ruling of the court on the demurrer to the complaint, and that there was no motion for a hew trial and no error presented except that relating to the ruling on the demurrer to the claim or complaint.	1	1929–1929
Taylor v. Griner neutral indctapp · 1914 2 sentences 1915See also Kahle v. Crown Oil Co. (1913), 180 Ind. 131, 138 , 100 N. E. 681; Taylor v. Griner (1913), 55 Ind. App. 617, 620 , 104 N. E. 607 ; Darter v. Grubb (1913), 56 Ind. App. 206, 208 , 102 N. E. 843 ; Rader v. Barrett Co. (1914), 59 Ind. App. 27, 34 , 108 N. E. 883, 884 . 6. 1915See also Kahle v. Crown Oil Co. (1913), 180 Ind. 131, 138 , 100 N. E. 681; Taylor v. Griner (1913), 55 Ind. App. 617, 620 , 104 N. E. 607 ; Darter v. Grubb (1913), 56 Ind. App. 206, 208 , 102 N. E. 843 ; Rader v. Barrett Co. (1914), 59 Ind. App. 27, 34 , 108 N. E. 883, 884 . 6.	1	1915–1915
Darter v. Grubb neutral indctapp · 1913 2 sentences 1915See also Kahle v. Crown Oil Co. (1913), 180 Ind. 131, 138 , 100 N. E. 681; Taylor v. Griner (1913), 55 Ind. App. 617, 620 , 104 N. E. 607 ; Darter v. Grubb (1913), 56 Ind. App. 206, 208 , 102 N. E. 843 ; Rader v. Barrett Co. (1914), 59 Ind. App. 27, 34 , 108 N. E. 883, 884 . 6. 1915See also Kahle v. Crown Oil Co. (1913), 180 Ind. 131, 138 , 100 N. E. 681; Taylor v. Griner (1913), 55 Ind. App. 617, 620 , 104 N. E. 607 ; Darter v. Grubb (1913), 56 Ind. App. 206, 208 , 102 N. E. 843 ; Rader v. Barrett Co. (1914), 59 Ind. App. 27, 34 , 108 N. E. 883, 884 . 6.	1	1915–1915
Rader v. A. J. Barrett Co. neutral indctapp · 1915 2 sentences 1915See also Kahle v. Crown Oil Co. (1913), 180 Ind. 131, 138 , 100 N. E. 681; Taylor v. Griner (1913), 55 Ind. App. 617, 620 , 104 N. E. 607 ; Darter v. Grubb (1913), 56 Ind. App. 206, 208 , 102 N. E. 843 ; Rader v. Barrett Co. (1914), 59 Ind. App. 27, 34 , 108 N. E. 883, 884 . 6. 1915See also Kahle v. Crown Oil Co. (1913), 180 Ind. 131, 138 , 100 N. E. 681; Taylor v. Griner (1913), 55 Ind. App. 617, 620 , 104 N. E. 607 ; Darter v. Grubb (1913), 56 Ind. App. 206, 208 , 102 N. E. 843 ; Rader v. Barrett Co. (1914), 59 Ind. App. 27, 34 , 108 N. E. 883, 884 . 6.	1	1915–1915
File v. Springel green ind · 1892 1 sentence 1906S. 1881, that “No judgment shall ever be reversed for any error committed in sustaining or overruling a demurrer for misjoinder of causes of action.” Armstrong v. Dunn (1896), 143 Ind. 433 ; File v. Springel (1892), 132 Ind. 312 ; Crum v. Yundt (1895), 12 Ind. App. 308 ; Fitzmaurice v. Puterbaugh (1897), 17 Ind. App. 318 .	1	1906–1906
Armstrong v. Dunn green ind · 1895 1 sentence 1906S. 1881, that “No judgment shall ever be reversed for any error committed in sustaining or overruling a demurrer for misjoinder of causes of action.” Armstrong v. Dunn (1896), 143 Ind. 433 ; File v. Springel (1892), 132 Ind. 312 ; Crum v. Yundt (1895), 12 Ind. App. 308 ; Fitzmaurice v. Puterbaugh (1897), 17 Ind. App. 318 .	1	1906–1906
Crum v. Yundt neutral indctapp · 1895 1 sentence 1906S. 1881, that “No judgment shall ever be reversed for any error committed in sustaining or overruling a demurrer for misjoinder of causes of action.” Armstrong v. Dunn (1896), 143 Ind. 433 ; File v. Springel (1892), 132 Ind. 312 ; Crum v. Yundt (1895), 12 Ind. App. 308 ; Fitzmaurice v. Puterbaugh (1897), 17 Ind. App. 318 .	1	1906–1906
Fitzmaurice v. Puterbaugh neutral indctapp · 1896 1 sentence 1906S. 1881, that “No judgment shall ever be reversed for any error committed in sustaining or overruling a demurrer for misjoinder of causes of action.” Armstrong v. Dunn (1896), 143 Ind. 433 ; File v. Springel (1892), 132 Ind. 312 ; Crum v. Yundt (1895), 12 Ind. App. 308 ; Fitzmaurice v. Puterbaugh (1897), 17 Ind. App. 318 .	1	1906–1906
Mustard v. Hoppess neutral ind · 1879 1 sentence 1895Mustard v. Hoppess, 69 Ind. 324 ; Hilton v. Mason, 92 Ind. 157 ; Hill v. Probst, 120 Ind. 528 ; Jones v. Cullen, 142 Ind. 335 ; Ohio, etc., R.	1	1895–1895
Hilton v. Mason neutral ind · 1883 1 sentence 1895Mustard v. Hoppess, 69 Ind. 324 ; Hilton v. Mason, 92 Ind. 157 ; Hill v. Probst, 120 Ind. 528 ; Jones v. Cullen, 142 Ind. 335 ; Ohio, etc., R.	1	1895–1895
Hill v. Probst green ind · 1889 1 sentence 1895Mustard v. Hoppess, 69 Ind. 324 ; Hilton v. Mason, 92 Ind. 157 ; Hill v. Probst, 120 Ind. 528 ; Jones v. Cullen, 142 Ind. 335 ; Ohio, etc., R.	1	1895–1895
State ex rel. Board of Commissioners v. Boice red ind · 1894 1 sentence 1895The gist of the contention of appellants’ learned counsel is, that inasmuch as the salary provisions as fixed by the act of 1891 (Acts of 1891, page 121), have been, declared unconstitutional by this court in the case of State, ex rel., v. Boice, 140 Ind. 506 , these are thereby eliminated from that act.	1	1895–1895
Jones v. Cullen green ind · 1895 1 sentence 1895Mustard v. Hoppess, 69 Ind. 324 ; Hilton v. Mason, 92 Ind. 157 ; Hill v. Probst, 120 Ind. 528 ; Jones v. Cullen, 142 Ind. 335 ; Ohio, etc., R.	1	1895–1895
Sisk v. Crump green ind · 1887 1 sentence 1894It is true, the complaint is not a model pleading, but, in our opinion, it is sufficient to withstand the demurrer under the rule enunciated in Sisk v. Crump, 112 Ind. 504 .	1	1894–1894
Wallace v. Long green ind · 1886 1 sentence 1888In Wallace v. Long, 105 Ind. 522 (55 Am.	1	1888–1888
Stanford v. Stanford green ind · 1873 1 sentence 1877The case of Stanford v. Stanford, supra, is therefore overruled, in so far as it is in conflict with this opinion.	1	1877–1877

Where else courts name it

CA 365 (1890–2026) PA 93 (1898–2025) VA 55 (1919–2026) NC 24 (1927–1969) NY 22 (1882–1953) GA 17 (1919–2014) CT 17 (1901–2001) MA 13 (1939–1976) IN 12 (1877–1960) OK 12 (1908–2017) OR 10 (1895–2024) AL 9 (1859–1983) MO 8 (1874–1946) MD 8 (1922–1993) WI 7 (1885–1974) KS 7 (1891–1963) SC 7 (1925–1984) TX 5 (1911–1945) VT 5 (1891–1959) KY 5 (1919–1939) MS 5 (1870–2011) OH 3 (1908–1966) TN 2 (1896–1925) WY 2 (1913–1921) MI 2 (1906–1922) MT 2 (1951–1953) ID 2 (1885–1957) SD 2 (1905–1916)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check