Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Indiana opinions name it 1 courts 2014–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Kevin M. Clark v. State of Indianagreen2 sentences2018Id. [10] Grimes argues that Officer Rawlins did not have the particularized and objective basis required for reasonable suspicion to justify the traffic stop. 2017Id. | 1 | 7 |
Jackson v. Stategreen1 sentence2016Id, [15] Consistent with' Terry , our court has observed that “[a] patdown search for weapons may be conducted if the officer is ‘justified in believing that the individual whose suspicious behavior he is investigating at close range is armed and presently dangerous to the officer or to others.’” Bell v. State, 13 N.E.3d 543, 545 (Ind.Ct.App.2014) (quoting Jackson v. State, 669 N.E.2d 744, 747 (Ind.Ct.App.1996)) (quoting Terry, 392 U.S. at 24 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 ). | 1 | 1 |
Ashley Bell v. State of Indianagreen1 sentence2016Id, [15] Consistent with' Terry , our court has observed that “[a] patdown search for weapons may be conducted if the officer is ‘justified in believing that the individual whose suspicious behavior he is investigating at close range is armed and presently dangerous to the officer or to others.’” Bell v. State, 13 N.E.3d 543, 545 (Ind.Ct.App.2014) (quoting Jackson v. State, 669 N.E.2d 744, 747 (Ind.Ct.App.1996)) (quoting Terry, 392 U.S. at 24 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 ). | 1 | 1 |
Merritt v. Stategreen1 sentence2015Id. [20] We will briefly discuss the law prior to the adoption of Ind.Code § 9-32-6-11 in 2013.' In Merritt v. State, 829 N.E.2d 472, 473-476 (Ind.2005), the Indiana Supreme Court considered whether placing a license plate in a vehicle’s rear window contravened Indiana’s statutes then governing the proper display and illumination of plates. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Murray
green
2 sentences2016Id. 2016Id. | 3 | 2015–2016 |
Stanley Kahn v. Beverly (Kahn) Baker
green
1 sentence2019Kahn , 36 N.E.3d at 1113 . [18] Here, a review of the evidence most favorable to the judgment indicates that, after Riley turned eighteen, she did not respond to Mother's continued efforts to contact her. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Terry v. Ohio
green
2 sentences2016Id, [15] Consistent with' Terry , our court has observed that “[a] patdown search for weapons may be conducted if the officer is ‘justified in believing that the individual whose suspicious behavior he is investigating at close range is armed and presently dangerous to the officer or to others.’” Bell v. State, 13 N.E.3d 543, 545 (Ind.Ct.App.2014) (quoting Jackson v. State, 669 N.E.2d 744, 747 (Ind.Ct.App.1996)) (quoting Terry, 392 U.S. at 24 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 ). 2016Id, [15] Consistent with' Terry , our court has observed that “[a] patdown search for weapons may be conducted if the officer is ‘justified in believing that the individual whose suspicious behavior he is investigating at close range is armed and presently dangerous to the officer or to others.’” Bell v. State, 13 N.E.3d 543, 545 (Ind.Ct.App.2014) (quoting Jackson v. State, 669 N.E.2d 744, 747 (Ind.Ct.App.1996)) (quoting Terry, 392 U.S. at 24 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 ). | 1 | 2016–2016 |