failed rule in Louisiana

1999The defendant relies upon the case of State v. Nomey, 613 So.2d 157 (La.1993), in support of his argument.

1996Art. 647; State v. Nomey, supra. Here, the record indicates that the defendant’s attorney filed a motion to appoint a sanity commission, but the trial court failed to rule on this motion prior to accepting the defendant’s guilty plea.

1992Giraud v. Johns, 523 So.2d 931 (La.App. 4th Cir.), writ denied, 531 So.2d 282 (La.1988); Hardin v. Munchies Food Store, 510 So.2d 33 (La.App. 2nd Cir.1987).

1989Giraud v. Johns, 523 So.2d 931 (La.

2022App 4t" Cir. 12/ 13/ 00), 775 So. 2d 1144 , 1147- 1148 ( where there were motions to compel pending before the trial court and the issue of the outstanding motions to compel were raised in the opposition to the motion for summary judgment, the trial court erred in ruling on the motion for summary judgment before the hearing on the motions to compel because prevailing on the motion to compel and obtaining such discovery could reveal a material issue of fact, rendering summary judgment premature).

2020Id.

2018In remanding the case in the first appeal, the trial court was ordered "to explicitly determine whether the defendant's situation is one of those rare and exceptional circumstances that would justify a downward departure from the legislatively mandated and presumptively constitutional sentence of life imprisonment at hard labor without the benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence." Pernell , 14-0678, p. 6 , 151 So.3d at 940 (quoting State v. Pernell , 13-0180 (La.

2015Id. at 427, 100 S.Ct. 1759 . .

2012Regarding the failure of the court to rule on a motion to reconsider sentence, this court held in State v. Lathan, 41,855 (La.App. 2 Cir. 2/28/07), 953 So.2d 890 , writ denied, 2007-0805 (La.3/28/08), 978 So.2d 297 : According to La.

2012Regarding the failure of the court to rule on a motion to reconsider sentence, this court held in State v. Lathan, 41,855 (La.App. 2 Cir. 2/28/07), 953 So.2d 890 , writ denied, 2007-0805 (La.3/28/08), 978 So.2d 297 : According to La.

2003In Ricard, supra, the issue involved the constitutionality of a statute and the propriety of an election.

1999The identical procedural problem was presented to this court in the case of State Through DOTD v. Scramuzza, 594 So.2d 521 (La.App. 5th Cir.1992).

1998The question of whether experts should have been provided to a defendant who is unable to afford the services of an investigator, expert, or other outside assistance for his defense is governed by State v. Touchet, 93-2839 (La.9/6/94), 642 So.2d 1213 .

1992Giraud v. Johns, 523 So.2d 931 (La.App. 4th Cir.), writ denied, 531 So.2d 282 (La.1988); Hardin v. Munchies Food Store, 510 So.2d 33 (La.App. 2nd Cir.1987).

1992Giraud v. Johns, 523 So.2d 931 (La.App. 4th Cir.), writ denied, 531 So.2d 282 (La.1988); Hardin v. Munchies Food Store, 510 So.2d 33 (La.App. 2nd Cir.1987).