failed challenge (Nevada) · Go Syfert
← Nevada issues

failed challenge in Nevada

6 Nevada opinions name it 2 courts 1968–2015 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Nevada courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nevada.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nevada. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Oade v. State green
nev · 1998
2 sentences

2015Yet, "lw'hat may be innocuous conduct in some circumstances may constitute prejudicial conduct in a trial setting," Oade, 114 Nev. at 621 , 960 P.2d at 338 (quoting Parodi v. Washoe Med.

2015Yet, "lw'hat may be innocuous conduct in some circumstances may constitute prejudicial conduct in a trial setting," Oade, 114 Nev. at 621 , 960 P.2d at 338 (quoting Parodi v. Washoe Med.

52015–2015
Miranda v. Arizona green
scotus · 1966
1 sentence

1968As his assignments of error, the appellant contends: (1) That the trial court violated the appellant’s constitutional rights by admitting into evidence the appellant’s confession of July 28, 1966, because the warnings required in the case of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) were not timely and adequately given. (2) That substantial evidence indicated the appellant to be insane, and the trial court erred in accepting a jury verdict finding the appellant guilty of second degree murder. (3) That the trial court failed to rule on the appellant’s capacity to waive his constitutional rights.

11968–1968

Statutes the citing opinions construe

NV § Nev. Rev. Stat. § 52.015 (5) NV § Nev. Rev. Stat. § 52.025 (5) NV § Nev. Rev. Stat. § 52.105 (5) NV § Nev. Rev. Stat. § 52.260 (5) NV § Nev. Rev. Stat. § 52.320 (5) NV § Nev. Rev. Stat. § 52.325 (5) NV § Nev. Rev. Stat. § 52.335 (5)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TX 46 (1905–2025) OH 37 (1996–2026) CA 32 (1911–2025) NY 28 (1987–2025) IL 26 (1974–2026) GA 13 (1977–2023) FL 12 (1924–2019) LA 12 (1989–2022) AL 10 (1976–2011) MO 6 (1997–2023) PA 6 (1963–2024) NV 6 (1968–2015) TN 6 (2000–2020) MI 6 (1994–2023) NM 5 (1967–2004) VA 5 (2012–2015) IN 5 (1994–2019) NC 5 (1987–2010) AR 5 (1992–2004) MS 4 (1961–2015) NE 4 (2006–2023) SC 4 (2001–2018) WA 4 (2015–2026) MD 4 (1971–1999) CT 4 (1996–2019) IA 4 (2014–2018) CO 4 (1979–2026) WV 3 (1993–2010) AZ 3 (2016–2020) OK 3 (2004–2009) UT 2 (2013–2019) NJ 2 (1994–2019) MN 2 (2015–2025) KY 2 (1961–2022) DE 2 (2020–2023)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check