10 Alabama opinions name it 2 courts 1976–2011 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Kelley v. Thomasgreen2 sentences2011See Kelley v. Thomas, supra (dismissing an appeal as being from a nonfinal judgment when the trial court failed to rule on a request for visitation). 2011See Kelley v. Thomas , supra (dismissing an appeal as being from a nonfinal judgment when the trial court failed to rule on a request for visitation). | 2 | 2 |
Pratt v. Prattgreen1 sentence2011Compare, e.g., Pratt v. Pratt, 56 So.3d 638 (Ala.Civ.App.2010) (reversing the award of visitation because it was not sufficiently specific and left too much discretion regarding the noncustodial parent’s visitation to the custodial parent and a third party). | 1 | 1 |
Conway v. HOUSING AUTH. OF BIRMINGHAMgreen1 sentence2009As stated in Conway v. Housing Authority of Birmingham District, 676 So.2d 344, 345 (Ala.Civ.App.1996), however, the 90-day period for ruling on postjudgment motions announced in Rule 59.1, Ala. R. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Redtop Market, Inc.green2 sentences2007See Rule 59.1; see also State v. Redtop Market, Inc., 937 So.2d 1013, 1014-15 (Ala. 2006). [6] Additionally, a Rule 59(e) motion must be filed within 30 days of the judgment it references. 2007See Rule 59.1; see also State v. Redtop Market, Inc. , 937 So.2d 1013 , 1014-15 (Ala. 2006). 6 Additionally, a Rule 59(e) motion must be filed within 30 days of the judgment it references. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ex Parte Alabama Dept. of Transp.
green
2 sentences2008Id. 2008Id. | 2 | 2008–2008 |
Johnson v. Life Ins. Co. of Alabama
green
2 sentences2003P., because the trial court failed to rule on the motions within 90 days. 581 So.2d at 440 . 2003Both motions were deemed denied under Rule 59.1, Ala.R.Civ.P., because the trial court failed to rule on the motions within 90 days. 581 So.2d at 440 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Bridges v. Bridges
green
1 sentence1992After an appeal to this court was dismissed for lack of a final judgment, see Bridges v. Bridges , 598 So.2d 935 (Ala.Civ.App. 1992), the trial court entered an order denying the husband's request for a decrease in alimony payments. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
ALABAMA HOSPITAL ASS'N v. Dillard
green
1 sentence1986Therefore, the issue of the standing of the United Council is not so dispositive as to merit an extensive discussion and resolution of the apparent conflict between Frazer and Dillard, supra. The judgment of the trial court holding that the plaintiffs do not have standing to bring the action is due to be reversed and the cause remanded. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
State v. Newberry
green
1 sentence1976As stated by this court recently in State of Alabama v. Newberry, Ala., 336 So.2d 181 (1976), “This court is a court of appellate review and will not entertain review proceedings until after the trial court has ruled. 2 Ala. Digest Appeal & Error, Sec. 242(1).” In addition, the State in brief mentions that the lower court failed to rule on the question of excessive damages. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.