12 Mississippi opinions name it 1 courts 1918–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Thomas v. Stategreen2 sentences2013Thomas v. State, 278 So.2d 469, 473 (Miss.1973) (citations omitted). 2010Thomas v. State, 278 So. 2d 469, 473 (Miss. 1973) (citations omitted). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Mundygreen2 sentences2011Id. at 574 (citations omitted) (emphasis added). ¶ 33. 2009Id. at 574 (citations omitted) (emphasis added). ¶33. | 2 | 2 |
Turner v. Stategreen2 sentences2008This Court has not decided "whether or not, in an [unlawful] game of chance, an alleged robber, taking only money he had lost in such unlawful game, would be guilty of robbery." Jones v. State, 216 Miss. 186, 189 , 62 So.2d 217 (1953) (citing Turner v. State, 177 Miss. 272, 279 , 171 So. 21, 23 (1936)). 2008This Court has not decided "whether or not, in an [unlawful] game of chance, an alleged robber, taking only money he had lost in such unlawful game, would be guilty of robbery." Jones v. State, 216 Miss. 186, 189 , 62 So.2d 217 (1953) (citing Turner v. State, 177 Miss. 272, 279 , 171 So. 21, 23 (1936)). | 2 | 2 |
Paymaster Oil Mill Company v. Mitchellgreen1 sentence1985In Paymaster Oil Mill Co. v. Mitchell, 319 So.2d 652, 657 (Miss. 1975), the Court quoted and restated the principle of law applying to motions for directed verdicts, as was set out in General Tire & Rubber Co. v. Darnell, 221 So.2d 104 (Miss. 1969): "The established rule is that when the court considers whether the defendant is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law, the court should consider the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiff, disregard any evidence on the part of defendant in conflict with that favorable to plaintiff, and if the evidence and reasonable inferences to be | 1 | 1 |
Sharpe v. Hanlinegreen1 sentence1973State v. Lawrence, 262 N.C. 162 , 136 S.E.2d 595 ; State v. Lunsford, 229 N.C. 229 , 49 S.E.2d 410 ." 144 S.E.2d at 574. | 1 | 1 |
Heard v. Jamesgreen1 sentence1964See Heard v. James, 49 Miss. 236 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Spratt
green
2 sentences2010In some cases, as where the defense is an alibi or the evidence develops no direct issue or contention that the taking was under a bona fide claim of right or was without any intent to steal, “felonious intent” may be simply defined as an “intent to rob” or “intent to steal.” State v. Spratt, supra. On the other hand, where the evidence raises a direct issue as to the intent and purpose of the taking, a more comprehensive definition is required. 1973In some cases, as where the defense is an alibi or the evidence develops no direct issue or contention that the taking was under a bona fide claim of right or was without any intent to steal, `felonious intent' may be simply defined as an `intent to rob' or `intent to steal.' State v. Spratt, supra. On the other hand, where the evidence raises a direct issue as to the intent and purpose of the taking, a more comprehensive definition is required. | 3 | 1973–2010 |
Jones v. State
green
2 sentences2008This Court has not decided "whether or not, in an [unlawful] game of chance, an alleged robber, taking only money he had lost in such unlawful game, would be guilty of robbery." Jones v. State, 216 Miss. 186, 189 , 62 So.2d 217 (1953) (citing Turner v. State, 177 Miss. 272, 279 , 171 So. 21, 23 (1936)). 2008This Court has not decided "whether or not, in an [unlawful] game of chance, an alleged robber, taking only money he had lost in such unlawful game, would be guilty of robbery." Jones v. State, 216 Miss. 186, 189 , 62 So.2d 217 (1953) (citing Turner v. State, 177 Miss. 272, 279 , 171 So. 21, 23 (1936)). | 2 | 2007–2008 |
State v. . Lunsford
green
2 sentences1991State v. Lawrence, 262 N.C. 162 , 136 S.E.2d 595 ; State v. Lunsford, 229 N.C. 229 , 49 S.E.2d 410 . 144 S.E.2d at 574 . 1991State v. Lawrence, 262 N.C. 162 , 136 S.E.2d 595 ; State v. Lunsford, 229 N.C. 229 , 49 S.E.2d 410 . 144 S.E.2d at 574 . | 2 | 1973–1991 |
State v. Lawrence
green
2 sentences1991State v. Lawrence, 262 N.C. 162 , 136 S.E.2d 595 ; State v. Lunsford, 229 N.C. 229 , 49 S.E.2d 410 . 144 S.E.2d at 574 . 1991State v. Lawrence, 262 N.C. 162 , 136 S.E.2d 595 ; State v. Lunsford, 229 N.C. 229 , 49 S.E.2d 410 . 144 S.E.2d at 574 . | 2 | 1973–1991 |
General Tire & Rubber Company v. Darnell
green
2 sentences1985In Paymaster Oil Mill Co. v. Mitchell, 319 So.2d 652, 657 (Miss. 1975), the Court quoted and restated the principle of law applying to motions for directed verdicts, as was set out in General Tire & Rubber Co. v. Darnell, 221 So.2d 104 (Miss. 1969): "The established rule is that when the court considers whether the defendant is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law, the court should consider the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiff, disregard any evidence on the part of defendant in conflict with that favorable to plaintiff, and if the evidence and reasonable inferences to be 1985In Paymaster Oil Mill Co. v. Mitchell, 319 So.2d 652, 657 (Miss. 1975), the Court quoted and restated the principle of law applying to motions for directed verdicts, as was set out in General Tire & Rubber Co. v. Darnell, 221 So.2d 104 (Miss. 1969): "The established rule is that when the court considers whether the defendant is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law, the court should consider the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiff, disregard any evidence on the part of defendant in conflict with that favorable to plaintiff, and if the evidence and reasonable inferences to be | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Melvin McGowan v. King, Incorporated
green
1 sentence1979The majority of federal courts that have considered the defense have held it to apply only to "clerical errors." McGowan v. King, Inc., 569 F.2d 845 (5th Cir.1978); Ives v. W.T. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Russel v. Town of Hickory
green
2 sentences1918In the case of Russel v. Hickory, 116 Miss. 46 , 76 So. 825 , the rule is laid down on the issuance of mandatory injunctions to obtain possession of land as follows: “The law is well settled that a defendant in possession under a bona-fide claim of title should not summarily be removed by mandatory process of the chancery court, especially where there is no averment that irreparable damage will be done the complainants.” The case of Burton v. Pepper, 116 Miss. 139 , 76 So. 762 , involved among -other things the issuance of a mandatory injunction compelling the defendant in the suit to surrende 1918In the case of Russel v. Hickory, 116 Miss. 46 , 76 So. 825 , the rule is laid down on the issuance of mandatory injunctions to obtain possession of land as follows: “The law is well settled that a defendant in possession under a bona-fide claim of title should not summarily be removed by mandatory process of the chancery court, especially where there is no averment that irreparable damage will be done the complainants.” The case of Burton v. Pepper, 116 Miss. 139 , 76 So. 762 , involved among -other things the issuance of a mandatory injunction compelling the defendant in the suit to surrende | 1 | 1918–1918 |
Burton v. Pepper
green
2 sentences1918In the case of Russel v. Hickory, 116 Miss. 46 , 76 So. 825 , the rule is laid down on the issuance of mandatory injunctions to obtain possession of land as follows: “The law is well settled that a defendant in possession under a bona-fide claim of title should not summarily be removed by mandatory process of the chancery court, especially where there is no averment that irreparable damage will be done the complainants.” The case of Burton v. Pepper, 116 Miss. 139 , 76 So. 762 , involved among -other things the issuance of a mandatory injunction compelling the defendant in the suit to surrende 1918In the case of Russel v. Hickory, 116 Miss. 46 , 76 So. 825 , the rule is laid down on the issuance of mandatory injunctions to obtain possession of land as follows: “The law is well settled that a defendant in possession under a bona-fide claim of title should not summarily be removed by mandatory process of the chancery court, especially where there is no averment that irreparable damage will be done the complainants.” The case of Burton v. Pepper, 116 Miss. 139 , 76 So. 762 , involved among -other things the issuance of a mandatory injunction compelling the defendant in the suit to surrende | 1 | 1918–1918 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.