Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
13 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 2018–2026 6 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Leegreen2 sentences2026Nevertheless, when “a trial court agrees to give a requested pattern instruction, an erroneous deviation from that instruction is preserved for appellate review without further request or objection.” State v. Lee, 370 N.C. 671, 676 , 811 S.E.2d 563, 567 (2018) (explaining that where a trial court agreed to instruct the jury on self-defense, but omitted part of such pattern language in the jury’s instruction and failed to give the parties notice of such omission, this substantive deviation preserved this issue for appellate review despite the defendant’s lack of objection). [A] request for an i 2026Nevertheless, when “a trial court agrees to give a requested pattern instruction, an erroneous deviation from that instruction is preserved for appellate review without further request or objection.” State v. Lee, 370 N.C. 671, 676 , 811 S.E.2d 563, 567 (2018) (explaining that where a trial court agreed to instruct the jury on self-defense, but omitted part of such pattern language in the jury’s instruction and failed to give the parties notice of such omission, this substantive deviation preserved this issue for appellate review despite the defendant’s lack of objection). [A] request for an i | 8 | 9 |
State v. Rossgreen2 sentences2018However, "[w]hen a trial court agrees to give a requested pattern instruction, an erroneous deviation from that instruction is preserved for appellate review without further request or objection." State v. Lee , 370 N.C. 671 , 676, 811 S.E.2d 563 , 567 (2018). "[A] request for an instruction at the charge conference is sufficient compliance with the rule to warrant our full review on appeal where the requested instruction is subsequently promised but not given, notwithstanding any failure to bring the error to the trial judge's attention at the end of the instructions." Id . (quoting State v. 2018However, "[w]hen a trial court agrees to give a requested pattern instruction, an erroneous deviation from that instruction is preserved for appellate review without further request or objection." State v. Lee , 370 N.C. 671 , 676, 811 S.E.2d 563 , 567 (2018). "[A] request for an instruction at the charge conference is sufficient compliance with the rule to warrant our full review on appeal where the requested instruction is subsequently promised but not given, notwithstanding any failure to bring the error to the trial judge's attention at the end of the instructions." Id . (quoting State v. | 4 | 5 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Richardson
green
2 sentences2025Defendant cites to this Court’s decision in Richardson to support his contention that “[w]hen a trial court agrees to give a requested pattern instruction, an erroneous deviation from that instruction is preserved for appellate review without further request or objection.” State v. Richardson, 270 N.C. App. 149 , 153, 838 S.E.2d 470 , 474 (2020). 2025Defendant cites to this Court’s decision in Richardson to support his contention that “[w]hen a trial court agrees to give a requested pattern instruction, an erroneous deviation from that instruction is preserved for appellate review without further request or objection.” State v. Richardson, 270 N.C. App. 149 , 153, 838 S.E.2d 470 , 474 (2020). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.