Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 New Hampshire opinions name it 1 courts 1979–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Hampshire courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Thomasgreen2 sentences2011State v. Thomas, 154 N.H. 189, 192 (2006). 2011See State v. Thomas, 154 N.H. 189, 192 (2006). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Howlandgreen2 sentences1981Notwithstanding the defendant’s strenuous arguments to the contrary, we are unaware of any means by which a person could commit sexual penetration without first engaging in sexual contact. “[T]he State is entitled to have the lesser included offense instruction submitted to the jury if the evidence justifies it.” State v. Howland, 119 N.H. 413, 416 , 402 A.2d 188, 191 (1979). 1981Notwithstanding the defendant’s strenuous arguments to the contrary, we are unaware of any means by which a person could commit sexual penetration without first engaging in sexual contact. “[T]he State is entitled to have the lesser included offense instruction submitted to the jury if the evidence justifies it.” State v. Howland, 119 N.H. 413, 416 , 402 A.2d 188, 191 (1979). | 2 | 2 |
State v. O'BRIENgreen2 sentences1985State v. O’Brien, 114 N.H. 233, 235-36 , 317 A.2d 783, 784-85 (1974). 1984If the evidence so warrants, id., Bailey would be entitled to a lesser-included offense instruction. | 1 | 2 |
State v. Muentnergreen1 sentence2020See Muentner, 406 N.W.2d at 420 (“Whether a defendant is entitled to a lesser included offense instruction and whether the statute of limitations has run on a crime are two separate questions.”). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Sotogreen1 sentence2015See State v. Soto, 162 N.H. 708, 718 (2011) (explaining usual manner of jury deliberations when lesser-included offenses are involved). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Hutchinsongreen1 sentence2006He argues that under a double jeopardy analysis, “The same evidence that the State offered to prove that Blomquist attempted to murder George also established that he committed first degree assault against George... by purposely... causing bodily injury by means of a deadly weapon.” See State v. Hutchinson, 137 N.H. 591, 596 (1993) (double jeopardy bars prosecution for first-degree assault and attempted murder where each indictment alleged the same conduct). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Merskigreen1 sentence1984See id. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Camerongreen1 sentence1983See State v. Cameron, supra at 350-51, 430 A.2d at 139-40 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Boonegreen2 sentences1981State v. Boone, 119 N.H. 594, 597 , 406 A.2d 113, 114 (1979); State v. Howland, 119 N.H. at 417, 402 A.2d at 191 . 1981State v. Boone, 119 N.H. 594, 597 , 406 A.2d 113, 114 (1979); State v. Howland, 119 N.H. at 417, 402 A.2d at 191 . | 1 | 1 |
Sansone v. United Statesgreen1 sentence1979See Sansone v. United States, 380 U.S. at 350 ; United States v. Harary, 457 F.2d 471, 477 (2d Cir. 1972). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Charles R. Hararygreen1 sentence1979See Sansone v. United States, 380 U.S. at 350 ; United States v. Harary, 457 F.2d 471, 477 (2d Cir. 1972). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Hampshire. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Littlefield
green
1 sentence2006Id. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
State v. Lopez
green
1 sentence1979State v. Lopez, 160 N.J. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.