Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1991–2021 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Olds v. Donnellygreen2 sentences2021The goals of the doctrine are to promote judicial efficiency, assure fairness to all parties with a material interest in an action, and encourage the conclusive determination of a legal controvers y." Olds v. Donnelly, 150 N.J. 424, 431 (1997). 2020The goals of the doctrine are to promote judicial efficiency, ensure fairness to all parties with a material interest in an action, and encourage the conclusive determination of a legal controversy." Olds v. Donnelly, 150 N.J. 424, 431 (N.J. 1997). | 4 | 5 |
State v. Dyalgreen2 sentences1994Because the invocation of privileges results in the loss of relevant evidence, “courts here and elsewhere have long construed them narrowly in an attempt to promote, at once, the goals of the privilege and the truthseeking role of the courts.” State v. Schreiber, 122 N.J. 579, 582-83 , 585 A.2d 945 (1991) (holding statutory physician-patient privilege inapplicable to drunk-driving prosecution); see also State v. Dyal, 97 N.J. 229, 237 , 478 A.2d 390 (1984) (declaring that physician-patient privilege must be restrictively interpreted); State v. Allen, 70 N.J. 474, 484-86 , 361 A.2d 5 (1976) (ho 1994Because the invocation of privileges results in the loss of relevant evidence, “courts here and elsewhere have long construed them narrowly in an attempt to promote, at once, the goals of the privilege and the truthseeking role of the courts.” State v. Schreiber, 122 N.J. 579, 582-83 , 585 A.2d 945 (1991) (holding statutory physician-patient privilege inapplicable to drunk-driving prosecution); see also State v. Dyal, 97 N.J. 229, 237 , 478 A.2d 390 (1984) (declaring that physician-patient privilege must be restrictively interpreted); State v. Allen, 70 N.J. 474, 484-86 , 361 A.2d 5 (1976) (ho | 2 | 3 |
State v. Schreibergreen2 sentences1994Because the invocation of privileges results in the loss of relevant evidence, “courts here and elsewhere have long construed them narrowly in an attempt to promote, at once, the goals of the privilege and the truthseeking role of the courts.” State v. Schreiber, 122 N.J. 579, 582-83 , 585 A.2d 945 (1991) (holding statutory physician-patient privilege inapplicable to drunk-driving prosecution); see also State v. Dyal, 97 N.J. 229, 237 , 478 A.2d 390 (1984) (declaring that physician-patient privilege must be restrictively interpreted); State v. Allen, 70 N.J. 474, 484-86 , 361 A.2d 5 (1976) (ho 1994Because the invocation of privileges results in the loss of relevant evidence, “courts here and elsewhere have long construed them narrowly in an attempt to promote, at once, the goals of the privilege and the truthseeking role of the courts.” State v. Schreiber, 122 N.J. 579, 582-83 , 585 A.2d 945 (1991) (holding statutory physician-patient privilege inapplicable to drunk-driving prosecution); see also State v. Dyal, 97 N.J. 229, 237 , 478 A.2d 390 (1984) (declaring that physician-patient privilege must be restrictively interpreted); State v. Allen, 70 N.J. 474, 484-86 , 361 A.2d 5 (1976) (ho | 1 | 3 |
Kent Motor Cars, Inc. v. Reynolds & Reynolds, Co.green2 sentences2021A-3612-19 12 The doctrine reflects a "long-held preference that related claims and matters arising among related parties be adjudicated together rather than in separate, successive, fragmented, or piecemeal litigation." Kent Motor Cars, Inc. v. Reynolds & Reynolds Co., 207 N.J. 428, 443 (2011). 2018The Supreme Court has articulated the goals of the doctrine to include "'the needs of economy and the avoidance of waste, efficiency and the reduction of delay, fairness to parties, and the need for complete and final disposition through the avoidance of piecemeal decisions.'" Ibid. (quoting Cogdell v. Hosp. | 1 | 2 |
State v. LJPgreen1 sentence2019"Because the invocation of privileges results in the loss of relevant evidence, 'courts . . . have long construed them narrowly in an attempt to promote, at once, the goals of the privilege and the truth[-]seeking role of the courts.'" State v. L.J.P., 270 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
Cogdell v. Hospital Center at Orangegreen1 sentence2018Ctr. at Orange, 116 N.J. 7, 15 (1989)). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Nixongreen2 sentences1991See, e.g., United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683, 710 , 94 S.Ct. 3090, 3108 , 41 L.Ed.2d 1039, 1065 (1974) (“Whatever their origins, these exceptions to the demand of every man’s evidence are not lightly created nor expansively construed, for they are in derogation of the search for truth.”); State v. Dyal, supra, 97 N.J. at 237 , 478 A.2d 390 (“The inevitable effect of allowing the privilege, nonetheless, is the withholding of evidence, often of the most reliable and probative kind____ [T]o the extent that the privilege is honored, it may undermine the search for truth ... [and] is restrictive 1991See, e.g., United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683, 710 , 94 S.Ct. 3090, 3108 , 41 L.Ed.2d 1039, 1065 (1974) (“Whatever their origins, these exceptions to the demand of every man’s evidence are not lightly created nor expansively construed, for they are in derogation of the search for truth.”); State v. Dyal, supra, 97 N.J. at 237 , 478 A.2d 390 (“The inevitable effect of allowing the privilege, nonetheless, is the withholding of evidence, often of the most reliable and probative kind____ [T]o the extent that the privilege is honored, it may undermine the search for truth ... [and] is restrictive | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Brileygreen2 sentences1994Because the invocation of privileges results in the loss of relevant evidence, “courts here and elsewhere have long construed them narrowly in an attempt to promote, at once, the goals of the privilege and the truthseeking role of the courts.” State v. Schreiber, 122 N.J. 579, 582-83 , 585 A.2d 945 (1991) (holding statutory physician-patient privilege inapplicable to drunk-driving prosecution); see also State v. Dyal, 97 N.J. 229, 237 , 478 A.2d 390 (1984) (declaring that physician-patient privilege must be restrictively interpreted); State v. Allen, 70 N.J. 474, 484-86 , 361 A.2d 5 (1976) (ho 1994Because the invocation of privileges results in the loss of relevant evidence, “courts here and elsewhere have long construed them narrowly in an attempt to promote, at once, the goals of the privilege and the truthseeking role of the courts.” State v. Schreiber, 122 N.J. 579, 582-83 , 585 A.2d 945 (1991) (holding statutory physician-patient privilege inapplicable to drunk-driving prosecution); see also State v. Dyal, 97 N.J. 229, 237 , 478 A.2d 390 (1984) (declaring that physician-patient privilege must be restrictively interpreted); State v. Allen, 70 N.J. 474, 484-86 , 361 A.2d 5 (1976) (ho | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Prevratil v. Mohr
green
2 sentences1997DiTrolio v. Antiles, 142 N.J. 253, 267 , 662 A.2d 494 (1995); Prevratil v. Mohr, 145 N.J. 180, 187 , 678 A.2d 243 (1996). 1997DiTrolio v. Antiles, 142 N.J. 253, 267 , 662 A.2d 494 (1995); Prevratil v. Mohr, 145 N.J. 180, 187 , 678 A.2d 243 (1996). | 2 | 1997–1997 |
State v. Szemple
green
2 sentences1994As we recently observed, “we think it important when considering the scope of various privileges to recognize that privileges preventing disclosure of relevant evidence are not favored and may often give way to a strong public interest.” State v. Szemple, 263 N.J.Super. 98, 101-02 , 622 A.2d 248 (App.Div.1993), leave to appeal granted, — N.J. - (1993) (construing priest-penitent privilege narrowly). 1994As we recently observed, “we think it important when considering the scope of various privileges to recognize that privileges preventing disclosure of relevant evidence are not favored and may often give way to a strong public interest.” State v. Szemple, 263 N.J.Super. 98, 101-02 , 622 A.2d 248 (App.Div.1993), leave to appeal granted, — N.J. - (1993) (construing priest-penitent privilege narrowly). | 2 | 1994–1994 |
State v. Allen
green
2 sentences1994Because the invocation of privileges results in the loss of relevant evidence, “courts here and elsewhere have long construed them narrowly in an attempt to promote, at once, the goals of the privilege and the truthseeking role of the courts.” State v. Schreiber, 122 N.J. 579, 582-83 , 585 A.2d 945 (1991) (holding statutory physician-patient privilege inapplicable to drunk-driving prosecution); see also State v. Dyal, 97 N.J. 229, 237 , 478 A.2d 390 (1984) (declaring that physician-patient privilege must be restrictively interpreted); State v. Allen, 70 N.J. 474, 484-86 , 361 A.2d 5 (1976) (ho 1994Because the invocation of privileges results in the loss of relevant evidence, “courts here and elsewhere have long construed them narrowly in an attempt to promote, at once, the goals of the privilege and the truthseeking role of the courts.” State v. Schreiber, 122 N.J. 579, 582-83 , 585 A.2d 945 (1991) (holding statutory physician-patient privilege inapplicable to drunk-driving prosecution); see also State v. Dyal, 97 N.J. 229, 237 , 478 A.2d 390 (1984) (declaring that physician-patient privilege must be restrictively interpreted); State v. Allen, 70 N.J. 474, 484-86 , 361 A.2d 5 (1976) (ho | 2 | 1994–1994 |
Joel v. Morrocco
green
2 sentences1997Joel v. Morrocco, 147 N.J. 546, 555 , 688 A.2d 1036 (1997); Prevratil v. Mohr, 145 N.J. 180, 197 , 678 A.2d 243 (1996). 1997Joel v. Morrocco, 147 N.J. 546, 555 , 688 A.2d 1036 (1997); Prevratil v. Mohr, 145 N.J. 180, 197 , 678 A.2d 243 (1996). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
DiTrolio v. Antiles
green
2 sentences1997DiTrolio v. Antiles, 142 N.J. 253, 267 , 662 A.2d 494 (1995); Prevratil v. Mohr, 145 N.J. 180, 187 , 678 A.2d 243 (1996). 1997DiTrolio v. Antiles, 142 N.J. 253, 267 , 662 A.2d 494 (1995); Prevratil v. Mohr, 145 N.J. 180, 187 , 678 A.2d 243 (1996). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.