Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2023 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Lamgreen2 sentences2023“The goals of the rule are ‘judicial economy and allowing prosecutors more leeway in charging multiple offenses.’” See State v. Crane, No. 21-0532, 2022 WL 951075 , at *1 (Iowa Ct. App. Mar. 30, 2022) (quoting State v. Lam, 391 N.W.2d 245, 251 (Iowa 1986)). 2022The goals of the rule are “judicial economy and allowing prosecutors more leeway in charging multiple offenses.” State v. Lam, 391 N.W.2d 245, 251 (Iowa 4 We note that one of the reasons given by the trial court was that Officer Garcia observed Green driving while revoked in violation of section 321J.9. | 3 | 3 |
Gacke v. Pork Xtra, L.L.C.green1 sentence2023Cf. Gacke v. Pork Xtra, L.L.C., 684 N.W.2d 168, 181 (Iowa 2004) (“This court has long held the view that ‘once a proper objection has been urged and overruled, it is not required that repeated objections be made to questions calling for the same type of evidence.’” (citation omitted)), overruled on other grounds by Garrison v. New Fashion Pork LLP, 977 N.W.2d 67 , 81–82 (Iowa 2022). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Johnsongreen1 sentence1999Cf. Milner, 571 N.W.2d at 12 (holding error was preserved when issue was raised at the earliest available opportunity and “the objectives of our error-preservation rules were accomplished”); State v. Johnson, 476 N.W.2d 330, 334 (Iowa 1991) (holding defendant failed to preserve error when his objection to the composition of the jury panel was not made until a post-verdict motion in arrest of judgment, noting that the failure to object earlier deprived the court of the opportunity to take corrective action); State v. Ritchison, 223 N.W.2d 207, 214 (Iowa 1974) (rejecting constitutional challenge | 1 | 1 |
State v. Milnergreen1 sentence1999Cf. Milner, 571 N.W.2d at 12 (holding error was preserved when issue was raised at the earliest available opportunity and “the objectives of our error-preservation rules were accomplished”); State v. Johnson, 476 N.W.2d 330, 334 (Iowa 1991) (holding defendant failed to preserve error when his objection to the composition of the jury panel was not made until a post-verdict motion in arrest of judgment, noting that the failure to object earlier deprived the court of the opportunity to take corrective action); State v. Ritchison, 223 N.W.2d 207, 214 (Iowa 1974) (rejecting constitutional challenge | 1 | 1 |
State v. Ritchisongreen1 sentence1999Cf. Milner, 571 N.W.2d at 12 (holding error was preserved when issue was raised at the earliest available opportunity and “the objectives of our error-preservation rules were accomplished”); State v. Johnson, 476 N.W.2d 330, 334 (Iowa 1991) (holding defendant failed to preserve error when his objection to the composition of the jury panel was not made until a post-verdict motion in arrest of judgment, noting that the failure to object earlier deprived the court of the opportunity to take corrective action); State v. Ritchison, 223 N.W.2d 207, 214 (Iowa 1974) (rejecting constitutional challenge | 1 | 1 |
State v. Trudogreen1 sentence1986It was defendant’s burden to show that “his interest in receiving a fair trial uninfluenced by the prejudicial effects which could result from a joint trial outweighed the State’s interest in judicial economy.” State v. Trudo, 253 N.W.2d 101, 104 (Iowa), cert denied, 434 U.S. 903 , 98 S.Ct. 299 , 54 L.Ed.2d 189 (1977). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Weigel v. Weigel
green
2 sentences2009Weigel, 467 N.W.2d at 282 . 2009Weigel, 467 N.W.2d at 282 . | 2 | 2009–2009 |
Barnhill v. Iowa District Court for Polk County
green
1 sentence2014We have previously stated one of the primary goals of rule 1.413 “is to maintain a high degree of professionalism in the practice of law.” Barnhill, 765 N.W.2d at 273 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Regular Common Carrier Conference of the American Trucking Assns. v. Interstate Commerce Commission
green
1 sentence1986It was defendant’s burden to show that “his interest in receiving a fair trial uninfluenced by the prejudicial effects which could result from a joint trial outweighed the State’s interest in judicial economy.” State v. Trudo, 253 N.W.2d 101, 104 (Iowa), cert denied, 434 U.S. 903 , 98 S.Ct. 299 , 54 L.Ed.2d 189 (1977). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Gamble v. Estelle
green
1 sentence1986It was defendant’s burden to show that “his interest in receiving a fair trial uninfluenced by the prejudicial effects which could result from a joint trial outweighed the State’s interest in judicial economy.” State v. Trudo, 253 N.W.2d 101, 104 (Iowa), cert denied, 434 U.S. 903 , 98 S.Ct. 299 , 54 L.Ed.2d 189 (1977). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Partin v. United States
green
1 sentence1986It was defendant’s burden to show that “his interest in receiving a fair trial uninfluenced by the prejudicial effects which could result from a joint trial outweighed the State’s interest in judicial economy.” State v. Trudo, 253 N.W.2d 101, 104 (Iowa), cert denied, 434 U.S. 903 , 98 S.Ct. 299 , 54 L.Ed.2d 189 (1977). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.