Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Ohio opinions name it 1 courts 1991–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Purola
green
2 sentences2020In re Purola, 73 Ohio App.3d 306 (3d Dist.1991). {¶25} It is apparent from the basic principles of contempt law that a court may punish a person for direct contempt who has threatened or disrupted court proceedings, even if the person did not specifically disobey any particular order issued before or during the proceeding. 2002Due process does not require the court to provide the contemnor with a hearing." In re Perula , 73 Ohio App.3d at 311 -312 . | 8 | 2002–2020 |
Windham Bank v. Tomaszczyk
green
2 sentences2007Pugh v. Pugh (1984), 15 Ohio St.3d 136 , 139 , citing Windham , 27 Ohio St.2d at 58 . 2006Windham Bank , 27 Ohio St.2d 55 at paragraph three of the syllabus. {¶ 10} A party may utilize contempt proceedings to enforce "[a] property settlement provision contained in a separation agreement, which is subsequently incorporated into a divorce decree." Harris v. Harris (1979), 58 Ohio St.2d 303 , paragraph one of the syllabus. | 2 | 2006–2007 |
In Matter of Lands
green
2 sentences2002However, "[a]n indirect contempt of court is one committed outside the presence of the court but which also tends to obstruct the due and orderly administration of justice." In re Lands , 146 Ohio St. at 595 . 1991In re Lands, supra, 146 Ohio St. at 595 , 33 O.O. at 82 , 67 N.E.2d at 437 . | 2 | 1991–2002 |
In Re McGinty
green
1 sentence2024Id., citing In re Gonzalez, 70 Ohio App.3d 752 , 591 N.E.2d 1371 (8th Dist.1990). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
In Re Contempt of Gonzalez
green
2 sentences2024Id., citing In re Gonzalez, 70 Ohio App.3d 752 , 591 N.E.2d 1371 (8th Dist.1990). 2024Id., citing In re Gonzalez, 70 Ohio App.3d 752 , 591 N.E.2d 1371 (8th Dist.1990). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Pugh v. Pugh
green
1 sentence2007Pugh v. Pugh (1984), 15 Ohio St.3d 136 , 139 , citing Windham , 27 Ohio St.2d at 58 . | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Harris v. Harris
green
1 sentence2006Windham Bank , 27 Ohio St.2d 55 at paragraph three of the syllabus. {¶ 10} A party may utilize contempt proceedings to enforce "[a] property settlement provision contained in a separation agreement, which is subsequently incorporated into a divorce decree." Harris v. Harris (1979), 58 Ohio St.2d 303 , paragraph one of the syllabus. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.