12 Ohio opinions name it 2 courts 2007–2026 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In re K.C.green2 sentences2020In support, the State cites In re K.C., 2017-Ohio-8383 , 99 N.E.3d 1061 (1st Dist.) for the proposition that “a parent has no standing to appeal an award of permanent custody and a denial of a relative's custody petition where the parent does not challenge the termination of her parental rights and the relative did not appeal the denial of her custody petition.” Id. at ¶ 12.1 However, this case is distinguishable, as Mother appeals from the denial of her own motion requesting that the maternal grandfather be granted legal custody of the children. 2020In support, the State cites In re K.C., 2017-Ohio-8383 , 99 N.E.3d 1061 (1st Dist.) for the proposition that “a parent has no standing to appeal an award of permanent custody and a denial of a relative's custody petition where the parent does not challenge the termination of her parental rights and the relative did not appeal the denial of her custody petition.” Id. at ¶ 12.1 However, this case is distinguishable, as Mother appeals from the denial of her own motion requesting that the maternal grandfather be granted legal custody of the children. | 1 | 2 |
In re S.F.green1 sentence2026Therefore, “a parent who does not challenge the termination of her or his own parental rights may not instead assert the rights of a relative who has not appealed the denial of her or his petition for legal custody.” In re K.C., 2017- Ohio-8383, ¶ 8 (1st Dist.); see In re S.F., 2020-Ohio-693, ¶ 51 (2d Dist.) (contrasting a scenario where a parent appeals from the parent’s own motion asking for a relative to be granted legal custody). | 1 | 1 |
Strickland v. Washingtongreen2 sentences2024In re Ridenour at ¶ 9. {¶7} “When presented with ineffective assistance of counsel claims in proceedings to terminate parental rights, Ohio courts apply the two-prong Strickland test.” Roque at ¶ 11, citing Ridenour at ¶ 9; see also Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). 2024In re Ridenour at ¶ 9. {¶7} “When presented with ineffective assistance of counsel claims in proceedings to terminate parental rights, Ohio courts apply the two-prong Strickland test.” Roque at ¶ 11, citing Ridenour at ¶ 9; see also Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). | 1 | 1 |
In Re Custody of Harrisgreen2 sentences2015In re Custody of Harris, 168 Ohio App.3d 1 , 2006-Ohio-3649 , 857 N.E.2d 1235, ¶ 55 (2d Dist.). {¶ 48} R.C. 3119.82 governs the designation of the parent who may claim children as dependents for federal income tax purposes. 2015In re Custody of Harris, 168 Ohio App.3d 1 , 2006-Ohio-3649 , 857 N.E.2d 1235, ¶ 55 (2d Dist.). {¶ 48} R.C. 3119.82 governs the designation of the parent who may claim children as dependents for federal income tax purposes. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Miller v. Dendinger
green
2 sentences2026“If the parties agree on which parent should claim the child as a dependent, then the court must designate that parent as the parent who may claim the child.” Id. 2026“If, however, the parties do not agree on which parent should claim the child, the court may award the tax exemption to the nonresidential parent ‘only if the court determines that this furthers the best interest of the [child]’ and the child support -31- Case No. 8-24-47 payments are substantially current.” Id., quoting R.C. 3119.82. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
In re K.M. (Slip Opinion)
green
2 sentences2022Neglected and dependent children need and are entitled to a stable, secure, and nurturing home. {¶ 37} Relying on In re K.M., 159 Ohio St.3d 544 , 2020-Ohio-995 , 153 N.E.3d 245 , the father and the mother counter that the 90-day limit in former R.C. 2151.35(B)(1) is jurisdictional and the failure of the juvenile court to act timely divested it of its authority to act in the matter. 2022Neglected and dependent children need and are entitled to a stable, secure, and nurturing home. {¶ 37} Relying on In re K.M., 159 Ohio St.3d 544 , 2020-Ohio-995 , 153 N.E.3d 245 , the father and the mother counter that the 90-day limit in former R.C. 2151.35(B)(1) is jurisdictional and the failure of the juvenile court to act timely divested it of its authority to act in the matter. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
In Re D.H.
green
2 sentences2021Cuyahoga No. 100681, 2014-Ohio-2652 ; In re D.H., 177 Ohio App.3d 246 , 894 N.E.2d 364 (8th Dist), ¶ 38. 2021Cuyahoga No. 100681, 2014-Ohio-2652 ; In re D.H., 177 Ohio App.3d 246 , 894 N.E.2d 364 (8th Dist), ¶ 38. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
In re J.G.
green
1 sentence2021Cuyahoga No. 100681, 2014-Ohio-2652 ; In re D.H., 177 Ohio App.3d 246 , 894 N.E.2d 364 (8th Dist), ¶ 38. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Brownlee v. Brownlee
green
1 sentence2016Id. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Perales v. Nino
green
2 sentences2012Appellant is challenging whether the court properly found that she was unsuitable as a parent under the test established by In re Perales, 52 Ohio St.2d 89 , 369 N.E.2d 1047 (1977). 2012Appellant is challenging whether the court properly found that she was unsuitable as a parent under the test established by In re Perales, 52 Ohio St.2d 89 , 369 N.E.2d 1047 (1977). | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Tuttle v. Tuttle, Ca2006-07-176 (12-17-2007)
neutral
1 sentence2010CA2006-07- 176, CA2006-07-177, 2007-Ohio-6743, ¶11 . {¶49} A trial court’s decision in awarding the federal income tax dependency exemption is governed by R.C. 3119.82, which states, in pertinent part: [w]henever a court issues, or whenever it modifies, reviews, or otherwise reconsiders a court child support order, it shall designate which parent may claim the children who are the subject of the court child support order as dependents for federal income tax purposes * * * If the parties agree on which parent should claim the children as dependents, the court shall designate that parent as the | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Coleman v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp.
neutral
2 sentences2007Coleman, 74 Ohio St.3d at 494 , 660 N.E.2d 424 . 2007Coleman, 74 Ohio St.3d at 494 , 660 N.E.2d 424 . | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.