parent violation (Wyoming) · Go Syfert
← Wyoming issues

parent violation in Wyoming

7 Wyoming opinions name it 1 courts 1883–2023 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Wyoming courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
Russell v. Russellgreen
wyo · 1997 · cited in 2 Wyoming opinions naming this issue, 2007–2018
2 sentences

2018See also , Morris , ¶ 13, 170 P.3d at 90-91 (citing Jackson v. Jackson, 961 P.2d 393 , 395 (Wyo. 1998) and Russell v. Russell, 948 P.2d 1351 , 1354 (Wyo. 1997) ). [¶30] Finally, Mother testified that the current arrangement for exchanging the girls every day on Father's "off week" is not good for them.

2007Since the only item of major concern against Mother was dealt with [in the contempt proceeding], the court will find that these items do not justify a change of custody. [113] Proof of "repeated, unreasonable failure[s] by the custodial parent to allow visitation to the other parent in violation of an order may be considered as evidence of a material change of cireumstances." Section *91 20-2-204(c); Jackson v. Jackson, 961 P.2d 393, 395 (Wyo.1998); Russell v. Russell, 948 P.2d 1351, 1354 (Wyo.1997).

22
Jackson v. Jacksongreen
wyo · 1998 · cited in 2 Wyoming opinions naming this issue, 2007–2018
2 sentences

2018See also , Morris , ¶ 13, 170 P.3d at 90-91 (citing Jackson v. Jackson, 961 P.2d 393 , 395 (Wyo. 1998) and Russell v. Russell, 948 P.2d 1351 , 1354 (Wyo. 1997) ). [¶30] Finally, Mother testified that the current arrangement for exchanging the girls every day on Father's "off week" is not good for them.

2007Since the only item of major concern against Mother was dealt with [in the contempt proceeding], the court will find that these items do not justify a change of custody. [113] Proof of "repeated, unreasonable failure[s] by the custodial parent to allow visitation to the other parent in violation of an order may be considered as evidence of a material change of cireumstances." Section *91 20-2-204(c); Jackson v. Jackson, 961 P.2d 393, 395 (Wyo.1998); Russell v. Russell, 948 P.2d 1351, 1354 (Wyo.1997).

22
Clark v. Alexandergreen
wyo · 1998 · cited in 2 Wyoming opinions naming this issue, 2006–2007
2 sentences

2007In reviewing such a matter, our standard of review is well established: "The party seeking a modification of the custody provisions of a divorce decree has the burden of showing that a material and substantial change of circumstances has occurred, after the entry of the initial decree, and that modification is in the best interests of the children." Clark v. Alexander, 953 P.2d 145, 150 (Wyo.1998).

2006In any proceeding in which a parent seeks to modify an order concerning child custody or visitation, proof of repeated, unreasonable failure by the custodial parent to allow visitation to the other parent in violation of an order may be considered as evidence of a material change of circumstances. [¶ 10] In reviewing such a matter, our standard of review is well established: “The party seeking a modification of the custody provisions of a divorce decree has the burden of showing that a material and substantial change of circumstances has occurred, after the entry of the initial decree, and tha

22
Morris v. Morrisgreen
wyo · 2007 · cited in 2 Wyoming opinions naming this issue, 2017–2018
2 sentences

2018See also , Morris , ¶ 13, 170 P.3d at 90-91 (citing Jackson v. Jackson, 961 P.2d 393 , 395 (Wyo. 1998) and Russell v. Russell, 948 P.2d 1351 , 1354 (Wyo. 1997) ). [¶30] Finally, Mother testified that the current arrangement for exchanging the girls every day on Father's "off week" is not good for them.

2017Given the inability of the parties to communicate effectively with one another, this lack of guidance results in arguments and requests for court intervention in the form of orders to show cause. g.Now that the minor child is school-aged, Father tries to subvert Mother’s participation in the minor child’s schooling by routinely “intercepting” the Friday school folder and keeping it at his home so Mother cannot see what the child is doing in school. [¶14] Under § 20-2-204(c), “proof of repeated, unreasonable failure by the custodial parent to allow visitation -to the other parent in violation o

12

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wyoming. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Bishop v. Bishop green
wyo · 2017
1 sentence

2023The district court’s conclusion that there has been a material change in circumstances affecting the children’s welfare on this basis is reasonable and is well- supported by the record. [¶31] The district court also found that Mother’s withholding of visitation for a period of several months was a material change in circumstance. “[P]roof of repeated, unreasonable failure by the custodial parent to allow visitation to the other parent in violation of an order may be considered as evidence of a material change of circumstances.” Bishop, ¶ 14, 404 P.3d at 1174 (quoting Wyo.

12023–2023
Ex parte Clark green
cal · 1891
1 sentence

1883Ex parte Clark, (Cal.) 25 Pac.

11883–1883

Statutes the citing opinions construe

WY § Wyo. Stat. § 20-2-201 (6) WY § Wyo. Stat. § 20-2-204 (6)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

CA 84 (1915–2026) IA 67 (1955–2026) NY 53 (1899–2025) TX 31 (1903–2025) PA 24 (1943–2024) CO 22 (1990–2025) OH 12 (2007–2026) MO 12 (1913–2021) IL 11 (1909–2023) MN 11 (1985–2024) MI 11 (1981–2026) GA 9 (1941–2026) OR 9 (1987–2024) NM 8 (2007–2020) FL 8 (1981–2012) RI 8 (1983–2023) IN 8 (1978–2025) WY 7 (1883–2023) TN 7 (2008–2021) NE 7 (1976–2022) AL 5 (2008–2026) MD 5 (1971–2010) AZ 5 (1983–2024) NJ 4 (1976–2024) AK 4 (2007–2021) DC 4 (1997–2021) AR 4 (1970–2017) NC 4 (1988–2021) ME 4 (1986–2020) KY 4 (2009–2023) MA 4 (2003–2025) UT 3 (2017–2023) ID 3 (2020–2020) WI 3 (1985–2023) CT 3 (1988–2001) NV 2 (1993–2013) HI 2 (2007–2008) SC 2 (1993–2012) WV 2 (1917–2013) MT 2 (1927–2020) KS 2 (1992–1992) DE 2 (1960–2026) ND 2 (2005–2005) VA 2 (2022–2022)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check