Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Pennsylvania opinions name it 3 courts 1975–2022 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Collins v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences2022Bd. of Rev., 415 A.2d 145, 146 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1980). 2021Bd. of Rev., 415 A.2d 145, 146 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1980). | 2 | 2 |
Reisman v. Ranoel Realty Co.green2 sentences2006See McKenna v. Sosso, 745 A.2d 1, 4 (Pa.Super.1999) (stating that “the right to a fair hearing comprises the right to notice and the right to an opportunity to be heard.”) (citation omitted); Reisman v. Ranoel Realty Co., 224 Pa.Super. 220 , 303 A.2d 511, 514 (1973) (“[P]articipants in arbitrations are entitled to a full hearing with the opportunity to be heard and to present evidence.”). 2006See McKenna v. Sosso, 745 A.2d 1, 4 (Pa.Super.1999) (stating that “the right to a fair hearing comprises the right to notice and the right to an opportunity to be heard.”) (citation omitted); Reisman v. Ranoel Realty Co., 224 Pa.Super. 220 , 303 A.2d 511, 514 (1973) (“[P]articipants in arbitrations are entitled to a full hearing with the opportunity to be heard and to present evidence.”). | 1 | 1 |
McKenna v. Sossogreen1 sentence2006See McKenna v. Sosso, 745 A.2d 1, 4 (Pa.Super.1999) (stating that “the right to a fair hearing comprises the right to notice and the right to an opportunity to be heard.”) (citation omitted); Reisman v. Ranoel Realty Co., 224 Pa.Super. 220 , 303 A.2d 511, 514 (1973) (“[P]articipants in arbitrations are entitled to a full hearing with the opportunity to be heard and to present evidence.”). | 1 | 1 |
Gardner v. Repaskygreen2 sentences1981State Real Estate Commission v. Rinck, 24 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 386 , 355 A.2d 858 (1976); see Gardner v. Repasky, 434 Pa. 126 , 252 A.2d 704 (1969); Donnon v. Downingtown Civil Service Commission, 3 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 366 , 283 A.2d 92 (1971). 1981State Real Estate Commission v. Rinck, 24 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 386 , 355 A.2d 858 (1976); see Gardner v. Repasky, 434 Pa. 126 , 252 A.2d 704 (1969); Donnon v. Downingtown Civil Service Commission, 3 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 366 , 283 A.2d 92 (1971). | 1 | 1 |
Merlino v. State Police Court Martial Boardgreen2 sentences1975Merlino v. State Police Court Martial Board, 7 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 631, 635-36, 301 A.2d 106, 108-109 (1973). 1975Merlino v. State Police Court Martial Board, 7 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 631, 635-36, 301 A.2d 106, 108-109 (1973). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Rinck
neutral
2 sentences1981State Real Estate Commission v. Rinck, 24 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 386 , 355 A.2d 858 (1976); see Gardner v. Repasky, 434 Pa. 126 , 252 A.2d 704 (1969); Donnon v. Downingtown Civil Service Commission, 3 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 366 , 283 A.2d 92 (1971). 1981State Real Estate Commission v. Rinck, 24 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 386 , 355 A.2d 858 (1976); see Gardner v. Repasky, 434 Pa. 126 , 252 A.2d 704 (1969); Donnon v. Downingtown Civil Service Commission, 3 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 366 , 283 A.2d 92 (1971). | 2 | 1981–1981 |
Smith v. Commonwealth
green
2 sentences1980Smith v. Pennsylvania State Horse Racing Commission, 18 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 1 , 333 A.2d 798 (1975). 1980Smith v. Pennsylvania State Horse Racing Commission, 18 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 1 , 333 A.2d 798 (1975). | 2 | 1976–1980 |
Gruzinski v. Department of Public Welfare
green
1 sentence2011Id. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Danner v. Bristol Township Civil Service Commission
green
2 sentences1985A tenured officer, thus, has the right to be advised of the charges pending against him, Danner v. Bristol Township Civil Service Commission, 64 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 470 , 440 A.2d 702 (1982); has the right to a fair hearing on those charges, Dayoub v. State Dental Council and Examining Board, 70 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 621 , 453 A.2d 751 (1982); and must be afforded the opportunity to cross-examine adverse witnesses. 1985A tenured officer, thus, has the right to be advised of the charges pending against him, Danner v. Bristol Township Civil Service Commission, 64 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 470 , 440 A.2d 702 (1982); has the right to a fair hearing on those charges, Dayoub v. State Dental Council and Examining Board, 70 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 621 , 453 A.2d 751 (1982); and must be afforded the opportunity to cross-examine adverse witnesses. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Dayoub v. Commonwealth
green
2 sentences1985A tenured officer, thus, has the right to be advised of the charges pending against him, Danner v. Bristol Township Civil Service Commission, 64 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 470 , 440 A.2d 702 (1982); has the right to a fair hearing on those charges, Dayoub v. State Dental Council and Examining Board, 70 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 621 , 453 A.2d 751 (1982); and must be afforded the opportunity to cross-examine adverse witnesses. 1985A tenured officer, thus, has the right to be advised of the charges pending against him, Danner v. Bristol Township Civil Service Commission, 64 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 470 , 440 A.2d 702 (1982); has the right to a fair hearing on those charges, Dayoub v. State Dental Council and Examining Board, 70 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 621 , 453 A.2d 751 (1982); and must be afforded the opportunity to cross-examine adverse witnesses. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board of Commonwealth v. Delgado
green
2 sentences1984He concedes, also, as has long been settled by law, Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board v. Delgado, 22 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 138 , 348 A.2d 447 (1975), that the referee’s statutory authority to appoint an impartial physician is entirely discretionary and that the failure to exercise that discretion does not constitute reversible error; but he argues, nevertheless, that there is a special responsibility imposed upon the referee by the terms of Section 420 to provide aid, including expert witness testimony, when needed by an indigent claimant. 3 He presents no authority in support of this content 1984He concedes, also, as has long been settled by law, Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board v. Delgado, 22 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 138 , 348 A.2d 447 (1975), that the referee’s statutory authority to appoint an impartial physician is entirely discretionary and that the failure to exercise that discretion does not constitute reversible error; but he argues, nevertheless, that there is a special responsibility imposed upon the referee by the terms of Section 420 to provide aid, including expert witness testimony, when needed by an indigent claimant. 3 He presents no authority in support of this content | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Imperial Food Products v. Tomarelli
green
2 sentences1984He concedes, also, as has long been settled by law, Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board v. Delgado, 22 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 138 , 348 A.2d 447 (1975), that the referee’s statutory authority to appoint an impartial physician is entirely discretionary and that the failure to exercise that discretion does not constitute reversible error; but he argues, nevertheless, that there is a special responsibility imposed upon the referee by the terms of Section 420 to provide aid, including expert witness testimony, when needed by an indigent claimant. 3 He presents no authority in support of this content 1984He concedes, also, as has long been settled by law, Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board v. Delgado, 22 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 138 , 348 A.2d 447 (1975), that the referee’s statutory authority to appoint an impartial physician is entirely discretionary and that the failure to exercise that discretion does not constitute reversible error; but he argues, nevertheless, that there is a special responsibility imposed upon the referee by the terms of Section 420 to provide aid, including expert witness testimony, when needed by an indigent claimant. 3 He presents no authority in support of this content | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Costanzo v. Commonwealth
neutral
2 sentences1984He concedes, also, as has long been settled by law, Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board v. Delgado, 22 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 138 , 348 A.2d 447 (1975), that the referee’s statutory authority to appoint an impartial physician is entirely discretionary and that the failure to exercise that discretion does not constitute reversible error; but he argues, nevertheless, that there is a special responsibility imposed upon the referee by the terms of Section 420 to provide aid, including expert witness testimony, when needed by an indigent claimant. 3 He presents no authority in support of this content 1984He concedes, also, as has long been settled by law, Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board v. Delgado, 22 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 138 , 348 A.2d 447 (1975), that the referee’s statutory authority to appoint an impartial physician is entirely discretionary and that the failure to exercise that discretion does not constitute reversible error; but he argues, nevertheless, that there is a special responsibility imposed upon the referee by the terms of Section 420 to provide aid, including expert witness testimony, when needed by an indigent claimant. 3 He presents no authority in support of this content | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Lamanna v. Commonwealth
neutral
2 sentences1984He concedes, also, as has long been settled by law, Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board v. Delgado, 22 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 138 , 348 A.2d 447 (1975), that the referee’s statutory authority to appoint an impartial physician is entirely discretionary and that the failure to exercise that discretion does not constitute reversible error; but he argues, nevertheless, that there is a special responsibility imposed upon the referee by the terms of Section 420 to provide aid, including expert witness testimony, when needed by an indigent claimant. 3 He presents no authority in support of this content 1984He concedes, also, as has long been settled by law, Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board v. Delgado, 22 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 138 , 348 A.2d 447 (1975), that the referee’s statutory authority to appoint an impartial physician is entirely discretionary and that the failure to exercise that discretion does not constitute reversible error; but he argues, nevertheless, that there is a special responsibility imposed upon the referee by the terms of Section 420 to provide aid, including expert witness testimony, when needed by an indigent claimant. 3 He presents no authority in support of this content | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Donnon v. Downingtown Civil Service Commission
green
2 sentences1981State Real Estate Commission v. Rinck, 24 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 386 , 355 A.2d 858 (1976); see Gardner v. Repasky, 434 Pa. 126 , 252 A.2d 704 (1969); Donnon v. Downingtown Civil Service Commission, 3 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 366 , 283 A.2d 92 (1971). 1981State Real Estate Commission v. Rinck, 24 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 386 , 355 A.2d 858 (1976); see Gardner v. Repasky, 434 Pa. 126 , 252 A.2d 704 (1969); Donnon v. Downingtown Civil Service Commission, 3 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 366 , 283 A.2d 92 (1971). | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Allstate Insurance v. Fioravanti
green
2 sentences1980Allstate Insurance Co. v. Fioravanti, 451 Pa. 108 , 299 A.2d 585 (1973). 1980Allstate Insurance Co. v. Fioravanti, 451 Pa. 108 , 299 A.2d 585 (1973). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.